Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / June 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Spaceship One in perspective30 Jun 2004 19:18 GMT91
Not to belittle the great achievement made yesterday, but are the SS1 concept
and materials usable for real space flight ? Or is this a design that is
really limited to the Xprize mission ?
From what I heard, it only reached top speed of about Mach 3. Is that correct
SS1 = 10 seconds in space?30 Jun 2004 16:31 GMT12
I calculate, if he overshot the boundary by 400 feet,
he was 'in space' legally for 10 seconds. Does this compute?
CourtTV: "Columbia Countdown"30 Jun 2004 00:58 GMT1
Their www site says that this will air Wednesday, June 30, at 8 pm, don't know
how they handle different time zones.  A bit of information below.
-- rk
---------------
SS1 orbital parameters29 Jun 2004 21:33 GMT1
From Jonathan's Space Report No. 529,  2004 Jun 28
http://www.planet4589.org/jsr.html
 Nevertheless this is a historic moment, marking the real dawn
 of commercial human spaceflight. The trajectory was highly
Challenger Debris28 Jun 2004 12:58 GMT5
Has there been any talk of removing at least some of the Challenger
debris so it can be used in the same manner as the Columbia debris? It
must be comforting, to a point, for the Columbia famlies that in a way,
the mission of their loved ones continues as research is done with
Cassini TV Coverage Schedule27 Jun 2004 19:56 GMT1
Be advised that I have posted the NASA TV coverage for the Cassini mission
on my web site. It is at:
http://www.spacearchive.info/news-2004-06-24-nasa.htm
Regards,
space shuttle as a suborbital plane27 Jun 2004 19:39 GMT6
Can the space shuttle be converted to a commercial suborbital plane?
The space shuttle can be carried aloft on a 747 and released like the
white knight and the spaceshipone.  The space shuttle would use the
fuel stored in the cargo bay and carry passengers to suborbital
Panel Probes Technical Risks Of Robotic Hubble Servicing27 Jun 2004 13:44 GMT3
http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_aerospacedaily_story.jsp?
id=news/pan06244.xml
Panel Probes Technical Risks Of Robotic Hubble Servicing  
By Jefferson Morris  
new virus warning27 Jun 2004 13:10 GMT5
got this email today, classic :)
NEW VIRUS WARNING
If you receive an e-mail with a subject line of "Badtimes," delete it
immediately WITHOUT reading it.  This is the most dangerous Email virus yet.
No Code talking here = WE ARE IN BIG TROUBLE25 Jun 2004 21:54 GMT1
No Code talking here = WE ARE IN BIG TROUBLE
Start with this list of people at this group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Quantumcomputing/
I think they are buidling "Something Really Big" and it all from
Finally!  "Runway to Orbit" has appeared at GPO.25 Jun 2004 13:47 GMT4
Ken's book has finally made it to the GPO.  I think it's a great book
and everyone should buy a copy, but It's kind of expensive,
Here's the URL for the GPO:
http://bookstore.access.gpo.gov/
Gregory C. Johnson named Manager of Launch Integration at KSC25 Jun 2004 05:31 GMT19
Regarding the following report from KSC: is Mr Johnson still eligible for a
flight, despite his new management job?
rgds
Neil
how well would space ship one scale up?24 Jun 2004 19:29 GMT10
to a orbital version?
I kinda like the launced from aircraft idea. It elminates the hazardous
controlled bomb launch. The airplane part can be refuled whatever times
necessary to get it to launch altitude. This should increase its possible
SpaceShip One - good luck!24 Jun 2004 03:41 GMT31
Interesting to note that the first 'Humanaut" is 62 and obviously not a
top-of-the-line physical specimen - good advertising for the rest of us who
hope one day to be able to go into space.
Outside inspections of the shuttle.23 Jun 2004 16:27 GMT4
NASA seem to be having problems getting their new boom together
for outside inspections, which begs the question why not have some
free floating semi autonomous / remote controlled device which could fly out
of the payload bay and have a look around?.    I thought that NASA had been
Pages: 1 2 3 May, 2004
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.