Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space Policy / March 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Artificial Spin Gravity And Energizing Shielding Mass In Space31 Mar 2006 18:22 GMT39
 Though I'm not sure of this, artificial or spin gravity's field toward an
outer rim, in addition to all other benefits to life, should act to energize
the outer rim's shielding mass of a spinning space station or space colony,
or what-have-you, to greater massiveness than one ...
SpaceX armchair quarterbacking31 Mar 2006 10:38 GMT47
I know I should probably wait for the official statement from spacex,
but I will speculate on the cause of the failure anyway.
I just looked at the video again after downloading it from
nasaspaceflight.
Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes31 Mar 2006 02:22 GMT3
 Why colonize space? Because we are dealing in absolutes. We are dealing in
returns, increasing returns (the frontiers and resources of the solar system
and beyond that a possibly unlimited Universe) over diminishing returns (the
ever growing, ever increasing weight of, ...
Aerospace spending29 Mar 2006 05:04 GMT1
It's a truism that aerospace spending is concentrated in the Sunbelt;
still interesting to know just *how* concentrated. From  RAND's 2005
"Tracking Federal Procurement and R&D Spending in the Aerospace
Sector," covering the decade 1993-2003:
NASA Eyes Alternative to Shuttle Main Engine for Heavylift29 Mar 2006 01:43 GMT69
From Space.com
http://space.com/spacenews/businessmonday_060320.html
NASA loking at using RS-68 instead of Shuttle engines
for heavy lift.
Crew Launch Vehicle to Launch From LC-40 ?29 Mar 2006 00:27 GMT1
Found this little snippet on Flight International today (excuse the wordwrap):
http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles/2006/03/28/Navigation/200/205707/Kennedy+re
adies+for+CEV+lift-offs+.html

Rumour has it, PorkLauncher 1B will at least be test flown from LC-40.
The same article ...
Nuclear Rockets28 Mar 2006 05:37 GMT41
What ever became of the nuclear rockets? I know NASA and the Air Force
had them under development then they stopped work on them. I know the
risk involved with doing with a nuclear rocket is going to make
launches from KSC or Vanderburd iffy but why not go the route of
Non sequitur27 Mar 2006 19:42 GMT2
The USPS stagecoach carrying the March 6 AWST (the Blackstar issue)
just arrived, and I think we have a strong candidate for the 2006 Non
Sequitur of the Year award.
On p.45, there's a picture caption that reads, "Iridium flares -
NASA Rushing To Mars As Per Bush's Policy27 Mar 2006 18:42 GMT430
NASA rushes plan to send humans to moon, Mars, despite doubts
By ROBERT S. BOYD
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - NASA is racing to carry out President Bush's costly vision
I'm going back in time to fix the space program. Y'all got any requests?27 Mar 2006 06:45 GMT12
I'm serious now. Art Bell sent me his time machine plans.
Examples:
Good request: "Prevent cancellation of Dyna-Soar program."
Bad request: "Prevent Dan Goldin's parents from meeting."
Historical comparisons27 Mar 2006 05:54 GMT92
Obviously historical comparisons have their weaknesses, but with that
caveat, what does the commercial passenger space industry look like to
you?  More like the begining of the airline industry, or more like the
development of the supersonic aircraft by the US,Europe and Russia in
ISP units26 Mar 2006 17:35 GMT7
Maybe the unit for isp should be changed to say nanoseconds? So all
isp gets multiplied by 10^9 and everybody anting to see large
isp in their rocket design will be happy...
Live Webcast of Falcon Launch26 Mar 2006 04:05 GMT11
Less than two hours now:
http://www.spacex.com/?content=webcast
Mars mission possible now26 Mar 2006 00:11 GMT1
Getting to Mars would  definately have been possible now if we had made
it a priority.
We might not be able to survive on Mars.
We probably wont be able to get back.
SpaceX Falcon Lost?25 Mar 2006 21:50 GMT11
I couldn't get onto the streaming video.
At least it didn't take out the launch pad.
Wait, it doesn't have a launch pad!
http://cosmic.lifeform.org
Pages: 1 2 3 4 February, 2006
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.