| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Curiosity Question about EELV Development Funding | 30 Sep 2005 12:34 GMT | 2 |
Hey all, Since I've decided to delurk for awhile, I was wondering if anyone happened to know off-hand how much of the development for Atlas V and Delta IV was paid for by the Air Force? AIUI, Boeing and LM were both
|
| How did NASA get it so wrong | 30 Sep 2005 04:21 GMT | 102 |
A clear majority on sci.space.policy seem to thing NASA's constellation architecture is seriously flawed. I certainly do. But NASA must have had a team of 100s working on this. Some of these people are probably smarter than I am. Most will know a lot more about
|
| OAAHSTO - A Forgotten Idea Still In Use | 29 Sep 2005 21:50 GMT | 9 |
You've all heard about SSTO (Single Stage to Orbit). The idea being that with exotic fuels or advanced engines, the very low payload fraction resulting from having to use multiple stages could be avoided, reducing the cost of going into space.
|
| 'Pugs contemplate killing NASA | 29 Sep 2005 18:36 GMT | 6 |
Did someone ask which US political party supported space more? It's pretty clearly not today's neocon Republicans: "Lawmakers Prepare Plans to Finance Storm Relief By CARL HULSE
|
| The Battle for New Orleans! | 29 Sep 2005 17:50 GMT | 299 |
It's not looting. What they're doing in New Orleans is scavenging. I don't care if it's stereos or jewelry, any unclaimed property within the city limits of New Orleans is rightfully
|
| Saturn V vs. new heavy lifter | 29 Sep 2005 03:50 GMT | 19 |
How does the proposed heavy lifter compare with the Saturn V in performance terms? Was there any thought given to simply remaking the Saturn V with appropriate upgrades in the areas where technology has moved on? After all the B-52
|
| China & Solar Power Satellites | 28 Sep 2005 18:09 GMT | 32 |
If any country is going to research and develop solar power satellites, isn't China a likely candidate? They are eager to demonstrate technical leadership, hungry for energy sources, would prefer to be independent of foreign resources, enjoy megaprojects, and seem to take
|
| A slightly more cynical poll | 28 Sep 2005 17:16 GMT | 24 |
OK, in the spirit of the oh-so-successful "Who Will Win X-33" contest... Do you think that between 2018 and 2023 (allowing five years for schedule slips) we will see an American walking on the moon as a part
|
| Stick - Saturn IB Reprise? | 28 Sep 2005 16:26 GMT | 58 |
I'm thinking about how SRB "Stick" compares to Saturn IB at: "www.geocities.com/launchreport/weblog.html" - Ed Kyle
|
| The Urge to Explore | 28 Sep 2005 15:06 GMT | 822 |
Paul Dietz, John Ordover, Brenda Clough and other Exploration Deniers claim that humanity has no urge to explore. However, they are insular nobodies attempting to project their own inner death upon humankind. Psychologists agree that the drive to explore is a quintessential human
|
| manned crew expolration cancelled | 27 Sep 2005 04:58 GMT | 9 |
Well. Not yet. But it will happen if you don't lift your voice now. You might and might not like the moon-mars program. But at the moment it is all we got.
|
| Defending the NASA Proposal | 27 Sep 2005 04:00 GMT | 43 |
NASA merits little enthusiasm these days from space junkies with their history of cancelled programs and an apparent "can't do without tens of billions of dollars" attitude along with what seems to be attempts to de-rail private space ventures, yet I have to defend the latest
|
| 1st Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne Launch Tonight | 27 Sep 2005 02:20 GMT | 3 |
Tonight's (9/25/05) Delta II GPS launch will be the first powered by a: "Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne RS-27A main engine" "http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/delta/delta2/gps_iir-14/fact_sheet.htm"
|
| The Upside-Down Space Shuttle | 27 Sep 2005 00:46 GMT | 11 |
In his book, "Exploring Space", Robert Zubrin noted that the space shuttle took an 'upside-down' approach to reusability. This is because extra weight in upper stages of a rocket, as results from a design for reusability, is more costly than extra weight in lower
|
| The waste of Apollo redux | 27 Sep 2005 00:46 GMT | 23 |
At the President's direction NASA has chosen to essentially repeat the one-off stunt first done forty years ago in the Apollo program. A far better use of public money would be to build demonstration Solar power stations in Earth orbit that use microwaves to send pollution free
|