Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space Policy / September 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Curiosity Question about EELV Development Funding30 Sep 2005 12:34 GMT2
Hey all,
Since I've decided to delurk for awhile, I was wondering if anyone
happened to know off-hand how much of the development for Atlas V and
Delta IV was paid for by the Air Force?  AIUI, Boeing and LM were both
How did NASA get it so wrong30 Sep 2005 04:21 GMT102
A clear majority on sci.space.policy seem to thing NASA's constellation
architecture is seriously flawed. I certainly do.
But NASA must have had a team of 100s working on this. Some of these
people are probably smarter than I am. Most will know a lot more about
OAAHSTO - A Forgotten Idea Still In Use29 Sep 2005 21:50 GMT9
You've all heard about SSTO (Single Stage to Orbit). The idea being that
with exotic fuels or advanced engines, the very low payload fraction
resulting from having to use multiple stages could be avoided, reducing
the cost of going into space.
'Pugs contemplate killing NASA29 Sep 2005 18:36 GMT6
Did someone ask which US political party supported space more?  It's
pretty clearly not today's neocon Republicans:
"Lawmakers Prepare Plans to Finance Storm Relief
By CARL HULSE
The Battle for New Orleans!29 Sep 2005 17:50 GMT299
It's not looting.
What they're doing in New Orleans is scavenging.
I don't care if it's stereos or jewelry, any unclaimed property
within the city limits of New Orleans is rightfully
Saturn V vs. new heavy lifter29 Sep 2005 03:50 GMT19
How does the proposed heavy lifter compare with the Saturn V in performance
terms?
Was there any thought given to simply remaking the Saturn V with appropriate
upgrades in the areas where technology has moved on? After all the B-52
China & Solar Power Satellites28 Sep 2005 18:09 GMT32
If any country is going to research and develop solar power satellites,
isn't China a likely candidate?  They are eager to demonstrate
technical leadership, hungry for energy sources, would prefer to be
independent of foreign resources, enjoy megaprojects, and seem to take
A slightly more cynical poll28 Sep 2005 17:16 GMT24
OK, in the spirit of the oh-so-successful "Who Will Win X-33"
contest...
Do you think that between 2018 and 2023 (allowing five years for
schedule slips) we will see an American walking on the moon as a part
Stick - Saturn IB Reprise?28 Sep 2005 16:26 GMT58
I'm thinking about how SRB "Stick" compares to Saturn IB
at: "www.geocities.com/launchreport/weblog.html"
- Ed Kyle
The Urge to Explore28 Sep 2005 15:06 GMT822
Paul Dietz, John Ordover, Brenda Clough and other Exploration Deniers
claim that humanity has no urge to explore. However, they are insular
nobodies attempting to project their own inner death upon humankind.
Psychologists agree that the drive to explore is a quintessential human
manned crew expolration cancelled27 Sep 2005 04:58 GMT9
Well. Not yet.
But it will happen if you  don't lift your voice now.
You might and might not like the moon-mars program.
But at the moment it is all we got.
Defending the NASA Proposal27 Sep 2005 04:00 GMT43
NASA merits little enthusiasm these days from space junkies with their
history of cancelled programs and an apparent "can't do without tens of
billions of dollars" attitude along with what seems to be attempts to
de-rail private space ventures, yet I have to defend the latest
1st Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne Launch Tonight27 Sep 2005 02:20 GMT3
Tonight's (9/25/05) Delta II GPS launch will be
the first powered by a:
"Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne RS-27A main engine"
"http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/delta/delta2/gps_iir-14/fact_sheet.htm"
The Upside-Down Space Shuttle27 Sep 2005 00:46 GMT11
In his book, "Exploring Space", Robert Zubrin noted that the space
shuttle took an 'upside-down' approach to reusability.
This is because extra weight in upper stages of a rocket, as results
from a design for reusability, is more costly than extra weight in lower
The waste of Apollo redux27 Sep 2005 00:46 GMT23
At the President's direction NASA has chosen to essentially repeat the
one-off stunt first done forty years ago in the Apollo program.  A far
better use of public money would be to build demonstration Solar power
stations in Earth orbit that use microwaves to send pollution free
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 August, 2005
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.