Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space Policy / January 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
The unsurprising Luna goal.19 Jan 2004 15:44 GMT19
First of all I should say how pleased I am to hear about this new Luna
and Mars goal, but I just cannot say that anything here has come as
much of a surprise.
In fact I would also nearly go as far to say that the President was
RIP poor little brave Beagle19 Jan 2004 08:50 GMT27
Even though I've not heard Prof 'Sideburns' say so I think we've lost
it.  Bugger.  :,-<  
I've heard a nu-labour minister say government money will be available
for a Beagle 3, but given nu-labours record, in general and the
The Bush Space Policy19 Jan 2004 08:00 GMT16
Speaking of space policies, we know that the White House (with some input
from Congress, NASA, and others) is working on one. They've already leaked
that a return to the Moon is a component of it.
Based on what I've gleaned from certain media and private sources (the
What odds on the first person to walk on Mars and when19 Jan 2004 06:09 GMT7
I guess the odds have changed slightly now.
My new odds would be
Nationality of first person on Mars :-
USA      25%
I'm Writing Fiction about the Moon: Some Basic Questions!19 Jan 2004 04:33 GMT45
I'm doing some fiction writing about the moon, and was curious about a
couple of things. Was wondering if anyone could shed light on these
questions!
1) Is the moon iluminated only by light reflected from the Earth? I
How to Mars ? people / robot debate19 Jan 2004 03:40 GMT9
The cost of one manned mission to Mars ($400.00 B ) is equivalent to a
thousand robotic missions.( $0.40 B) We could put dozens of scientific
satellites in ordit around not only all our solar system's planets but also
all their major moons. In addition we could send dozens of  ...
Is Hubble's successor approved and funded?19 Jan 2004 02:16 GMT7
Is the James Webb Space Telescope a (more or less) secure program at
this point?  Has the design been finalized?  Has construction begun?
I'm guessing that it was intended from the start to go up on an
expendable launch vehicle, since I've heard no mention of any impact
NASA to Start From Scratch in New [Moon/Mars Exploration] Effort19 Jan 2004 00:12 GMT17
My comments in [brackets]
Found at:
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/science/AP-Moon-Mars-Whats-Needed.html?pagewante
d=print&position
=
January 9, 2004
Why Wasn't ISS Built Sooner?18 Jan 2004 23:37 GMT7
Since a major point of the shuttle was to construct a
space station why didn't construction start with like the
third or fourth shuttle launch in the 1980s?  Why didn't
more people question the absence of any serious station
NASA's $1 billion boondogle18 Jan 2004 23:12 GMT3
I may be kind of skeptical, but I think it will take the extra $1
billion President Bush has pledged for NASA just to keep it going at
current levels.  Here's why:
Everything is classified now.  Even technical journal articles have to
Mars flyby a good practice run?18 Jan 2004 22:57 GMT18
There has been some talk of the U.S. doing a Mars flyby similar to the
Apollo 8 mission. This could be done relatively quickly and prevent other
nations (such as China) from stealing the show by doing it first. A dozen or
so Delta V-H launches would be required plus some assembly ...
Far Left Group Opposes a Return to the Moon18 Jan 2004 18:55 GMT361
For your outrage:
http://www.tompaine.com/images/dynamic/427.pdf
--
Mark R. Whittington
Dubya's Moon/Mars space proposal18 Jan 2004 18:24 GMT3
..... IMO, sounds like a smokescreen to revive Reagan's space-based
SDI "Star Wars" initiative, considering how unilateral Shrub's
proposal appears to be, and that it could involve the Pentagon (as
well as providing a long-term $100+ Billion gravy train for the usual
Technical challenges for landing on Mars18 Jan 2004 17:42 GMT16
Assuming something like Zubrin's 'Mars Direct' is contemplated for a manned
Mars mission (a variation on the theme is very likely IMHO because it makes
perfect sense, unless a 'fast track' mission is attempted), I see one big
technical problem: trying to land all the spacecraft ...
More than 6,000 Kg of thrust by pnn18 Jan 2004 17:17 GMT25
Subject: More than 6,000 Kg of thrust by pnn
It is given an update of actual Asps PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion), i.e. in
what manner might be increased the PNN propulsion to more 6,000 kg of thrust
with an electric power of 25 Kw .
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 December, 2003
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.