| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| The unsurprising Luna goal. | 19 Jan 2004 15:44 GMT | 19 |
First of all I should say how pleased I am to hear about this new Luna and Mars goal, but I just cannot say that anything here has come as much of a surprise. In fact I would also nearly go as far to say that the President was
|
| RIP poor little brave Beagle | 19 Jan 2004 08:50 GMT | 27 |
Even though I've not heard Prof 'Sideburns' say so I think we've lost it. Bugger. :,-< I've heard a nu-labour minister say government money will be available for a Beagle 3, but given nu-labours record, in general and the
|
| The Bush Space Policy | 19 Jan 2004 08:00 GMT | 16 |
Speaking of space policies, we know that the White House (with some input from Congress, NASA, and others) is working on one. They've already leaked that a return to the Moon is a component of it. Based on what I've gleaned from certain media and private sources (the
|
| What odds on the first person to walk on Mars and when | 19 Jan 2004 06:09 GMT | 7 |
I guess the odds have changed slightly now. My new odds would be Nationality of first person on Mars :- USA 25%
|
| I'm Writing Fiction about the Moon: Some Basic Questions! | 19 Jan 2004 04:33 GMT | 45 |
I'm doing some fiction writing about the moon, and was curious about a couple of things. Was wondering if anyone could shed light on these questions! 1) Is the moon iluminated only by light reflected from the Earth? I
|
| How to Mars ? people / robot debate | 19 Jan 2004 03:40 GMT | 9 |
The cost of one manned mission to Mars ($400.00 B ) is equivalent to a thousand robotic missions.( $0.40 B) We could put dozens of scientific satellites in ordit around not only all our solar system's planets but also all their major moons. In addition we could send dozens of ...
|
| Is Hubble's successor approved and funded? | 19 Jan 2004 02:16 GMT | 7 |
Is the James Webb Space Telescope a (more or less) secure program at this point? Has the design been finalized? Has construction begun? I'm guessing that it was intended from the start to go up on an expendable launch vehicle, since I've heard no mention of any impact
|
| NASA to Start From Scratch in New [Moon/Mars Exploration] Effort | 19 Jan 2004 00:12 GMT | 17 |
My comments in [brackets] Found at: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/science/AP-Moon-Mars-Whats-Needed.html?pagewante d=print&position= January 9, 2004
|
| Why Wasn't ISS Built Sooner? | 18 Jan 2004 23:37 GMT | 7 |
Since a major point of the shuttle was to construct a space station why didn't construction start with like the third or fourth shuttle launch in the 1980s? Why didn't more people question the absence of any serious station
|
| NASA's $1 billion boondogle | 18 Jan 2004 23:12 GMT | 3 |
I may be kind of skeptical, but I think it will take the extra $1 billion President Bush has pledged for NASA just to keep it going at current levels. Here's why: Everything is classified now. Even technical journal articles have to
|
| Mars flyby a good practice run? | 18 Jan 2004 22:57 GMT | 18 |
There has been some talk of the U.S. doing a Mars flyby similar to the Apollo 8 mission. This could be done relatively quickly and prevent other nations (such as China) from stealing the show by doing it first. A dozen or so Delta V-H launches would be required plus some assembly ...
|
| Far Left Group Opposes a Return to the Moon | 18 Jan 2004 18:55 GMT | 361 |
For your outrage: http://www.tompaine.com/images/dynamic/427.pdf -- Mark R. Whittington
|
| Dubya's Moon/Mars space proposal | 18 Jan 2004 18:24 GMT | 3 |
..... IMO, sounds like a smokescreen to revive Reagan's space-based SDI "Star Wars" initiative, considering how unilateral Shrub's proposal appears to be, and that it could involve the Pentagon (as well as providing a long-term $100+ Billion gravy train for the usual
|
| Technical challenges for landing on Mars | 18 Jan 2004 17:42 GMT | 16 |
Assuming something like Zubrin's 'Mars Direct' is contemplated for a manned Mars mission (a variation on the theme is very likely IMHO because it makes perfect sense, unless a 'fast track' mission is attempted), I see one big technical problem: trying to land all the spacecraft ...
|
| More than 6,000 Kg of thrust by pnn | 18 Jan 2004 17:17 GMT | 25 |
Subject: More than 6,000 Kg of thrust by pnn It is given an update of actual Asps PNN (Non Newtonian Propulsion), i.e. in what manner might be increased the PNN propulsion to more 6,000 kg of thrust with an electric power of 25 Kw .
|