| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| News: Costly astronauts wield too much clout - James Oberg | 01 Aug 2003 00:42 GMT | 2 |
Costly astronauts wield too much clout Thu Jul 31, 6:26 AM ET Add Op/Ed - USA TODAY to My Yahoo! By James Oberg A recent NASA (news - web sites) inspector general's report criticized
|
| NEWS: Many, Many Planets May Exist | 31 Jul 2003 23:33 GMT | 21 |
Here are an interesting pair of articles to read: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/extrasolar-03m.html http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/07/22/stars.survey/index.html Back to back, they extrapolitively imply the existence of a very large
|
| (Solar) winds of change ? | 31 Jul 2003 16:48 GMT | 2 |
Two articles of interest: http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/07/29/europe.usa.reut/index.html "Europe takes aim at U.S. space monopoly" "Because the United States has focused on its military applications, Europe
|
| Time to scrap the Hubble telescope? | 31 Jul 2003 00:45 GMT | 8 |
http://smh.com.au/articles/2003/07/27/1059244488651.html
|
| Wireless in Space | 28 Jul 2003 19:06 GMT | 3 |
I see from a recent announcement (on sci.space.news) that TransOrbital intends using wireless communications aboard its Trailblazer spacecraft. For example, between the cameras ("tethered on the outside of the spacecraft") and its other systems.
|
| The Greenpeace Report, Part II: NanoWars | 28 Jul 2003 14:16 GMT | 1 |
For your information and/or entertainment, The Greenpeace Report, Part II: NanoWars http://nanobot.blogspot.com/2003_07_20_nanobot_archive.html#105915612210166946 Howard
|
| Earth <--> Moon comms | 28 Jul 2003 13:01 GMT | 8 |
I was just thinking the other day that if there was a Moon Base and this Moon Base had several telescopes systems on it, needing Earth control and data feedback I should add, then what is the best way to handle Earth / Moon communication?
|
| Is Steve Bennett Getting Serious? | 27 Jul 2003 16:57 GMT | 2 |
Starchaser once seemed to be something of a gimmick to sell merchendise and website access, with nothing much to show but a few launches that wouldn't have raised eyebrows at Black Rock. Lately though, they seem to have actually been getting serious, especially since the XPrize has ...
|
| 7 Delta-IV launches will be transfered to Atlas-V | 27 Jul 2003 12:01 GMT | 2 |
USAF announced the decission to transfer 7 Delta-IV launches of the EELV Buy 1 to Atlas-V. Additionally 3 Vandenberg launches of EELV Buy 2 will be granted to Atlas-V. So it is now 14 Atlas-V vs. 12 Delta-IV for the Buy procurement.
|
| Seriously OT: "Freedom Fries" vs. "Courriel" | 25 Jul 2003 13:41 GMT | 20 |
Some months ago the European press (along with American leftist nuts) had a field day with a move in the House of Representatives to have "French Fries" renamed "Freedom Fries" in the House cafeteria. It was pointed out as evidence of stupid American flag-waving patriotic
|
| How long before they resurrect the X-33 program? | 25 Jul 2003 07:53 GMT | 22 |
I wonder how long it will take them to figure out that the OSP is a step backwards and that without a specific plan to put all cargo on a) ELV's or b) a new shuttle derived cargo vehicle will put the safety of Shuttle pilots even more at risk (NASA engineers are already complaining ...
|
| Heard too much and need to vent. | 23 Jul 2003 16:47 GMT | 2 |
Now I have been following NASA's odd ideas on space policy for a few years now, where if you can forgive my desire I just need to make myself heard. These days of course it is all about the Shuttle and how this is a
|
| News - EADS May Put Tourists in Stratosphere - Moscow Times | 22 Jul 2003 20:05 GMT | 2 |
EADS May Put Tourists in Stratosphere The Moscow Times - Tuesday, Jul. 22, 2003 By Lyuba Pronina - Staff Writer Thrill seekers with $10,000 to burn may soon get the chance to take
|
| quiz | 21 Jul 2003 04:21 GMT | 1 |
sorry for the distraction, my posts aren't getting through. This is a quiz, only a quiz...
 Signature -Kim-
|
| Re: ESA Funding question | 20 Jul 2003 08:53 GMT | 1 |
In sci.space.policy Jose M. Arnesto <jarnesto@nospamplease.computer.org> wrote:
> On 28 Jun 2003 19:25:15 GMT, simberg.interglobal@org.trash (Rand > Simberg) wrote: >>Well, actually the analogy is broken for a different reason. It isn't |