| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Spaceship 1 | 23 Oct 2004 21:56 GMT | 1 |
From: "Alan Erskine" <alanerskine1@bigpond.com> Message-ID: <L2Kbd.26204$5O5.90011@news-server.bigpond.net.au> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:52:33 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 147.10.38.179
|
| Big G Gemini Question | 23 Oct 2004 17:34 GMT | 42 |
Back in I guess about '67, McD-D built a mockup of the Big G Gemini that could carry a baseball team into space. The mockup had windows built into the sides to see inside. Does that mockup still exist? Is it on display anywhere?
|
| ntrs.nasa.gov is Fully Up and Running Again | 23 Oct 2004 15:54 GMT | 1 |
All of the PDF's in http://ntrs.nasa.gov/ are fully available again after a two week hiatus. I've just spent a glorious couple of hours downloading more of that wonderful data again. Enjoy. And my heartfelt thanks to the guys at NASA. It must have been a heck of a
|
| Winged _Martian_ Gemini?! | 22 Oct 2004 16:39 GMT | 22 |
Okay, somebody explain to me what the hell this is all about: http://www.ninfinger.org/~sven/models/gemini/winggemini.html http://www.ninfinger.org/~sven/models/gemini/wg_01.jpg http://www.ninfinger.org/~sven/models/gemini/wg_02.jpg
|
| Early Apollo inflatable airlock concept and the Leonov spacewalk | 21 Oct 2004 21:08 GMT | 1 |
While looking through the NASA NTRS archive I found this document showing an early concept for Apollo that used an inflatable airlock for spacewalks: "Apollo, volume 4 - Growth and advanced concepts Final report"
|
| Slightly Off Topic But Relevant | 21 Oct 2004 18:04 GMT | 4 |
I, like many folks who read this newsgroup, downloaded the .pdf files that Rusty brought to our attention. Thanks Rusty! I attempted to put the .pdf files I downloaded on a CD-R. I used Roxio's CD Creator, and successfuilly created a data file with the .pdf files. However, when I
|
| Rogere Chaffee-U2 photos for Kennedy? | 21 Oct 2004 04:00 GMT | 5 |
Was Roger Chaffee the actual U-2 pilot who took the San Cristobal photos that were shown to Kennedy and displayed in the UN by Adlai Stevenson?
|
| bigger plans for Saturn V | 20 Oct 2004 07:44 GMT | 33 |
A while back, while discussing LC 39, I remarked that they must have had much bigger (tentative) plans for the Saturn V. See: http://www.astronautix.com/lvfam/saturnv.htm ---
|
| white knight | 20 Oct 2004 03:21 GMT | 24 |
hi .. does anyone know how far into the "coffin corner" (how close has high speed stall to low speed stall gotten) white knight is at maximum altitude with SS1 attached?
|
| A Question About A Book & Designations | 19 Oct 2004 23:14 GMT | 6 |
A few months ago, at a library sale, I picked up a book about the Cape, published in 1968, titled " Liftoff! The Story Of America's Spaceport ", by L. B. Taylor. Fine condition, too. Anyway, skimming in the early Apollo section, I found something
|
| Since it's So Damned Quiet Here... | 18 Oct 2004 20:32 GMT | 15 |
Seems that China's 20th return capsule landed a tad off the mark- http://www.spacedaily.com/news/china-04zzq.html Dale
|
| Msnbc.com(Oberg)--Tribute to an unsung space hero | 18 Oct 2004 16:20 GMT | 5 |
Msnbc.com(Oberg)--Tribute to an unsung space hero Spacecraft designer Max Faget leaves a huge legacy http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6227454 By James Oberg, NBC News space analyst // Special to MSNBC
|
| The crew of the shuttle Columbia did not | 18 Oct 2004 02:10 GMT | 15 |
"Alan Erskine" <alanerskine1@bigpond.com>wrote in message news:<eI08d.13179$5O5.37900@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> The crew of the shuttle Columbia did not return safely to > Earth; yet we can pray that all had sex with each other > before they became doa back on earth. |
| For Sale Shuttle Orbital Tracking Maps | 17 Oct 2004 22:39 GMT | 16 |
These are actual space shuttle mission ground track map discarded from NASA, post mission. They are in excellent condition, in color, without extraneous folds or markings. The maps are labeled with printing date, orbital flight paths, degrees, latitudes, longitudes, political ...
|
| Comparing US/USSR space programs | 17 Oct 2004 22:18 GMT | 3 |
Several times I've run across wisecracks that the US space program of the 1960s (and after?) was socialist-style -- government-run, centralized, keeping unproductive centers alive, etc... while the competing designers and design teams of the USSR's program looked in
|