Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space Flight / May 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Non-Nuclear Open Cycle Gas Core Beamrider30 May 2004 19:03 GMT6
Gas core nuclear thermal rockets have long been attractive in paper
studies on the exploitation of space.  Their high ISPs and high thrust
have the potential to open up the entire solar system.  However, the
billions of dollars that engine development would cost, coupled with
Ascender: Airship to Orbit?29 May 2004 18:32 GMT7
This was an interesting article:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5025388/
Gee, this sounds like it would be a much more enjoyable Space Tourism
experience. Instead of the brief 30-min trip on SpaceShipOne, have a
Aerospikes29 May 2004 05:55 GMT1
Bono's aerospike designs from the 60s feature toroidal comubstion
chambers, whereas recent designs like the X-33's linear aerospike
usually have several small, distinct chambers.  Why the change?  Is it
just easier to manufacture distinct chambers?  Would the toroidal
FAQ-2-B: sci.space.tech reading list29 May 2004 03:56 GMT6
References: <28326d49.0401161506.344a8146@posting.google.com>
Whoo hoo, another update, based on part of the feedback (don't
worry, I'm not ignoring HGH's comments, etc).
Reading lists and recommended references are a recurrent theme in
Powered re-entry28 May 2004 18:54 GMT13
I believe that we have beaten this horse to death here during prior
discussions.
Yet I feel dissatisfied with the extent of our discussions and the
state of the art in reentry technology. I feel that something can be
"Reinventing the Solar Power Satellite" paper27 May 2004 15:59 GMT15
For any of you with an interest in Solar Power Satellite (SPS, or SSPS)
concepts, I finally received NASA Technical Memorandum copies of my
papers "Reinventing the Solar Power Satellite" and "Peak Power Markets
for Satellite Solar Power" from the Houston IAF Congress. (actually,
Anybody else notice this: Amateur rocket fired into space23 May 2004 05:01 GMT3
Is this significant at all? So far only the BBC is reporting it (as far as I
can see).
Amateur rocket fired into space
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3724841.stm
Comets to Mars?19 May 2004 09:11 GMT7
In _Entering Space_ Robert Zubrin mentions that it would take only a
small amount of Delta V to send Kuiper Belt Objects down to Mars. He
believes comets striking Mars would thicken the atmosphere and raise the
temperature. (I also seem to recall Kim Stanley Robinson using this ...
Lobbing Passengers for fun and profit?18 May 2004 07:03 GMT3
Hi all....
Just wondering....
If you were putting people in rockets and "lobbing" the passenger capsule from
the point of departure to the destination how much more fuel/energy  would it
Daytime Starlight15 May 2004 22:16 GMT10
What is the threshold of brightness for seeing an astronomical object
in the daytime Earth sky?
Specifically, would a star with 70% of Sol's absolute brightness be
visible at 45 AU?
Shuttle where are we going ?15 May 2004 21:00 GMT1
Have we lost the will and vision of the space program of the beginning
of the 1960s.
Or what?
Mike
Probe to A Centauri13 May 2004 18:17 GMT12
Assume for the sake of argument that we discover an earth mass planet
in the A or B Centauri system.  Further assume spectroscopic analysis
detects copious water, O2, N2, and methane in its atmosphere.  Further
assume that it becomes possible with 2-3X Apollo effort to send a
Incoming!!!06 May 2004 01:00 GMT15
Hypothetically...
You've captured your stony-iron asteroid and parked it at the
Earth-moon L4 point. You've got mines and smelters producing tens of
megatons of refined metal annually, enough to meet a noticeable
Same Old Rockets for Bold New Mission ?05 May 2004 15:45 GMT4
(CNN)
http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/04/30/space.rockets.reut/index.html
CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida (Reuters) -- Aerospace giants are already
prepared to compete for lucrative contracts in NASA's next big
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.