Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space Flight / December 2003



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Earth-Jupiter fast transit31 Dec 2003 17:18 GMT2
I'm trying to figure out time-of flight for hyperbolic fast transits
from Earth to Jupiter, and it's not going well. Can anybody point me
towards either a table of such (with, say, varius departure V's at
earth, and the time of flight to Jupiter orbit), or perhaps a
Lunar Sample Return via Tether31 Dec 2003 16:56 GMT38
My father (Henry Cate) and I have come up with an initial tether project
that might be fun, affordable, and profitable.  The idea is to use a
rotating tether to pickup some Lunar samples, bring them back to Earth,
and sell them.
Radiation a Mars trip hazard?31 Dec 2003 15:53 GMT15
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/09/science/space/09RADI.html
The thing I don't understand is that people have been spending much more
time in orbit than the round-trip to Mars. Although the upper atmosphere
does shield them somewhat, the majority of the radiation is still getting
beagle failure guesses?31 Dec 2003 14:30 GMT4
I am holding out hope the mission will still succeed, but meanwhile, I'm trying
to think of the possible reasons for failure, and what if anything could have
been done to prevent or recover from them. Interested in your rankings of these
possibilities or alternate most likely ...
Nexus Rocket Engine Test Successful; 10 Times More Thrust Than Deep Space 1 Engine and Lasts 3 Times Longer (10 years)30 Dec 2003 19:44 GMT5
Does anyone know how much this engine would cut down the time to a
Mission to Mars. If such a mission could take 2 to 3 weeks then
gentleman I'm convinced that we will have settlements on Mars in 10 to
15 years providing there is water up there.
HTHL vs VTVL - Wheeled sled for landing?25 Dec 2003 05:04 GMT3
Thinking about the problem some more it seems a big problem would be landing
a high speed glider onto a sled that is on tracks.  This would mean that the
sled could only control it's movements in one dimension.  A bad cross wind or
gust leaves the glider to do all the working of ...
Improved Specific Impulse Rocket Engines24 Dec 2003 06:50 GMT6
Looking only at the vacuum specific impulse of plain hydrogen-oxygen
rockets, is it possible to advance their specific impulse to 500, or
even 520?
For example, I recall Mr. Spencer recently mentioning that an ideal
Anniversary of sorts just past24 Dec 2003 04:49 GMT3
I had thought I remembered that the first posts in the
then-brand-new sci.space reorg groups went out in
early January 1994, but reviewing Google records
found some from mid December 1993, one as early as
Artificial sunlight?23 Dec 2003 07:04 GMT3
In several experiments conducted by NASA and by the Russians plants
were grown indoors using an artificial light.  What type of light was
used that produces light on the same wave lengths as the suns does?
Christopher
RLV physicaly impossible ?22 Dec 2003 01:29 GMT14
I am really amazed by all these optimistic people trying to do rlvs
and i belive in these peoples cause! however it strikes me that these
people all seem a bit to optimistic for ex almoast all the groups i
have investigated are into liquid propellant engines, and they seem to
Peroxide biprop ignition16 Dec 2003 03:11 GMT10
Some methods I've seen mentioned for peroxide biprop ignition are:
 Decompose the peroxide with catalyst pack.
 Pyrotechnic igniter in the chamber.
 Dissolve catalyst in fuel.
white knight: air-launched sst15 Dec 2003 23:23 GMT2
Would a supersonic jet the size of the spaceship-one gain much performance
by being launched from underneath the white-knight from 48,000ft?
Toby
Improved Isp Rocketry II15 Dec 2003 12:44 GMT3
Two questions this time:
1) Is it possible to get kerosene-LOX or propane-LOX to 395Isp? I've
seen numbers around 360 on www.astronautix.com .
2) How effectively do large, altitude compensating nozzles
This is the most important CATS post ever!15 Dec 2003 11:59 GMT13
The technology described in this post has not been tested, but
it looks trivial when compared to rocket launchers, and it
may reduce the cost of space access to a few dollars per kilogram!
The technology is based on GPS, a reusable sounding rocket,
Astrometry12 Dec 2003 22:01 GMT1
I understand that the large and expensive Gaia astrometry satellite will
achieve very accurate stellar parallaxes from (I believe) the L2 point -
which still only gives a 2AU baseline. Why not put a cheaper, lighter, less
precise astrometry package on (say) Kuyper Express (or ...
Pages: 1 2 November, 2003
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.