Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Astronomy / July 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
revisiting Apollo01 Aug 2004 00:34 GMT274
THE APOLLO HOAX FAQ version 4.3 - July 2004
Written by Nathan Jones
Subject: (1) Forward and Intent
In recent years there have been many criticisms and
"The Calendar" by David Ewing Duncan:  Numerous Errors?01 Aug 2004 00:29 GMT13
I have recently read "The Calendar" by David Ewing Duncan.  It is an
excellent book, and one that often had me going back over the pages to
check or compare what I was currently reading with what I had read
earlier.  In doing so, however, I found several discrepancies that I
Finite Universe:  The Torus Shape31 Jul 2004 23:53 GMT10
http://www.ams.org/new-in-math/mathnews/universe.html
What is the shape of the universe? Is it finite? These are two of the most
important questions in cosmology today. Mathematics is providing striking
new insights into deducing the shape of the universe from observational
Two astronomy questions31 Jul 2004 22:53 GMT27
1.  Are the constellations within the Milky Way?
2.  Do we have a clue as to where the earth resides in the Milky Way?
I gather we are quite a ways from the dense center, but how far away?
(center? outer edge?)
URI physics employee invents new antenna technology31 Jul 2004 19:18 GMT22
URI physics employee invents new antenna technology
Media Contact: Jan Wenzel, 401-874-2116
KINGSTON, R.I. -- June 2, 2004 -- Rob Vincent, an
employee in the University of Rhode Island's Physics
my curseys are good31 Jul 2004 18:59 GMT2
Dirk van de moortal is a bad person and a moron.  Morons like him destroyed the
physics groups.  The physics groups have been taken over by bad people, ideits,
fools, morons and nuts.  They were not happy with destroying the physics groups
they needed to expand to more groups like ...
Display of ignorance by 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>31 Jul 2004 18:33 GMT1
Another blunder by 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>
Forwarded message:
[ Subject: Re: Another blunder by Uncle Al
[ From: Bill Vajk <bill9north@hotmailDITCHTHIS.com>
Thread starter for OG31 Jul 2004 15:07 GMT34
Good friend OG (Owen) was invited to start a new thread wherein he
directly addresses those four 'Mainline Issues' that were repeatedly
asked of him in the old "Speed of gravity..." thread. He kept avoiding
and evading those issues there, but now he has the opportunity to
Free Meade 6" Reflector31 Jul 2004 10:07 GMT6
I have an Meade 6" Reflector i want to get it out the way so if any one
wants it Email me.
You must collect it
It is in need of a clean up but apart from that works ok.
Evidence of artficial structures found on the Moon and Mars31 Jul 2004 01:03 GMT15
It seems more and more people are willing to go against the mainstream
and say we see evidence of artificial structures on Mars, and in some
cases even on the Moon.
Arthur C. Clarke even confessed in a live interview and debate with an
PHYSICS - 'PUTTING THE WEIRDNESS TO WORK'31 Jul 2004 00:26 GMT18
Physics: "Putting The Weirdness To Work"  
Scientists say quantum materials will be the basis for
amazing devices, but when?
Science & Technology
Saturn tonight?30 Jul 2004 23:51 GMT2
In the western horizon around 8pm Arizona time, I thought I saw rings
around a planet with my naked eye.  Was this Saturn or Jupiter with
an optical illusion?
-Tom
FAQ30 Jul 2004 22:37 GMT1
I've lost the link for the FAQ can someone post the link please
TIA
Damian
Is the universe eternal?30 Jul 2004 22:02 GMT2
I think not, but I recognize there are other well reasoned opinions on this
issue and I welcome your rebuttal to my specific points or any points of
your own. My two main reasons for thinking this way are:
1) The second law of thermodynamics precludes an eternal universe because
Help for arithmetically challenged30 Jul 2004 18:52 GMT9
I'm trying to work out percentage difference in solar radiation
reaching a point on Earth at perihelion and aphelion. (At a basic
level - not allowing for atmospheric absorbtion and reflection etc.)
perihelion distance 147,098,217 kms
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 June, 2004
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.