| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Testing controversy not confined to English mags. | 31 Oct 2004 23:26 GMT | 1 |
http://tinyurl.com/3jngd I found this article and translated part of it. It appears testing and conclusion controversy is not confined to Sky and Tel, Astronomy alone.
|
| EQ6 SkyScan is out | 31 Oct 2004 22:31 GMT | 4 |
The Skywatcher EQ6 mount with SkyScan goto is on their web site now. Specs look good, anybody got one? http://www.skywatchertelescope.net/EQ6SkyScan.html
|
| Why magazine equipment reviews suck | 31 Oct 2004 21:40 GMT | 42 |
Because they DO NOT provide those reviews in a context that is important to the consumer, namely, how does this scope compare to it's logical competition. For instance, instead of bull-s-------. people by saying
|
| BK-7 Vs Pyrex---help! | 31 Oct 2004 21:02 GMT | 20 |
Hi all... I'm looking for a 12-15" Dob. I like Discovery so far---decent quality and within reason on price. I did speak with Hardin and they told me they use BK-7 glass for their primary mirrors. Orion uses Pyrex. Which is better?
|
| Seben 900mm Reflector Telescope | 31 Oct 2004 15:50 GMT | 6 |
I have been offered a new Seben 900mm reflector telescope for £65, i can't find any info on Seben,is it worth it ? Thanks John.
|
| Suggested Starparty Policy: No Chinese made equipment allowed | 31 Oct 2004 05:37 GMT | 41 |
These cheap junky Chinese "instruments" are rapidly filling the fields of star parties and replacing traditional quality equipment. Instead of an eclectic mix of homebuilt, vintage and high-end instruments, we now have rows upon rows of garbage from the big 3. There needs to be
|
| Telescope testing - blind trials? | 31 Oct 2004 04:49 GMT | 2 |
The thread about magazine telescope reviews got me thinking. Has anybody ever performed a double-blind trial of a range of scopes? I imagine something like fitting them all with identical focussers and putting them all behind a screen of some kind, so you couldn't see or
|
| Moon Question | 30 Oct 2004 23:45 GMT | 4 |
Today I looked up at a setting moon in the west and the face of the moon was tilted at 90 degrees from the verticle. I even had some others confirm what I was seeing. I have seen this often in the morning and you don't see this when it rises. Why does this
|
| Updated Eclipse Image | 30 Oct 2004 22:38 GMT | 1 |
http://galaxyphoto.com/fS2/h_eclispe.jpg
 Signature -Jason Ware ---------------------------------------------------------
|
| Lunar eclipse from Texas | 30 Oct 2004 22:35 GMT | 1 |
Pictures here: http://www.dl-digital.com/astrophoto/moon-eclipse.htm -Dick L.
|
| Lunar Eclipse Photos | 30 Oct 2004 22:30 GMT | 3 |
Here are my meager attempts at photographing the Lunar Eclipse. :) http://traladin123.fastmail.fm/eclipse/index.html Charles C.
|
| Types of Mountings | 30 Oct 2004 21:43 GMT | 8 |
"Altazimuth mountings tend to be cheaper, lighter, less clumsy, and more quickly set up than equatorial ones, mountings tend to be cheaper, lighter, less clumsy, and more quickly set up than equatorial ones,..." OK, I am immersed in FAQs (really, I'm doing my homework before ...
|
| DST: Blame Ben | 30 Oct 2004 20:26 GMT | 4 |
Love it, exempt from it, or hate it, here's a good site about Daylight Savings Time: http://webexhibits.org/daylightsaving/index.html Including Ben Franklin's original essay from 1784...
|
| Sox Eclipse Cards (image) | 30 Oct 2004 19:34 GMT | 3 |
Threw this together this morning after a long night of baseball and eclipse imaging: http://www.lecza.com/astro/eclipse2004/ All images taken with Canon Digital Rebel prime focus on Meade 12"
|
| planetarium software based on gravity | 30 Oct 2004 19:25 GMT | 2 |
I have been searching the web for software which calculates the absolute position of planets and the sun, which is based on the laws of gravity. All software I found is based on the trigonometrical calculations with the current postion and speed of the planets. These programs ...
|