Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Re: NASA Targets June Launch for Space Shuttle Atlantis



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free SpaceKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: NASA Targets June Launch for Space Shuttle Atlantis

Danny Deger12 Apr 2007 19:07
>> Op Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:18:29 -0700, schreef Hyper:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> of how any system can become too complicated to manage effectively or
> efficiently.

I agree.  I think winged spacecraft are inherently bad for two reasons:

1.  The termal protection is fragile and complex.
2.  The weather requirements for ascent aborts and end of mission landing
are too high

I am a big fan of capsules for manned spacecraft.  Send the big payloads up
without people in a winged vehicle.  Wasn't Challanger carrying a TDRS?  Why
risk life to send up a payload such as this?

Danny Deger

> George

George12 Apr 2007 14:10
> Op Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:18:29 -0700, schreef Hyper:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Are you sure?

Ironically, the very capabilities that made the STS so attractive to begin
with is leading to it's demise.  I think the Shuttle is a classic example
of how any system can become too complicated to manage effectively or
efficiently.

George

nmp12 Apr 2007 08:31
Op Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:18:29 -0700, schreef Hyper:

> Unfortunately, the requirement for a rescue flight also means we'll
> never see two shuttles in orbit at the same time.

Unless of course when a real rescue flight must be done.

> THAT would be a publicity stunt I'd love to watch.

Are you sure?

Hyper12 Apr 2007 07:18
> > What would prevent NASA from launching Atlantis on june 8th and
> > Endeavour at end of June ?
>
> LON rescue flight capability. The next orbiter won't be ready in time to
> rescue 118 if Endeavour launches that early. That's the reality with a
> three orbiter fleet as long as LON capability is a program requirement.

Unfortunately, the requirement for a rescue flight also means we'll
never see two shuttles in orbit at the same time.
THAT would be a publicity stunt I'd love to watch.

Jorge R. Frank12 Apr 2007 02:05
John Doe <jdoe@doe.org> wrote in news:89322$461d7eca$cef8887a$28578
@TEKSAVVY.COM:

>> Endeavour's STS-118 mission to the space station and now is targeted
>> for launch in August.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> What would prevent NASA from launching Atlantis on june 8th and
> Endeavour at end of June ?

LON rescue flight capability. The next orbiter won't be ready in time to
rescue 118 if Endeavour launches that early. That's the reality with a
three orbiter fleet as long as LON capability is a program requirement.

Signature

JRF

Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.


John Doe12 Apr 2007 00:34
> Endeavour's STS-118 mission to the space station and now is targeted
> for launch in August.

Unless the decision to extend the Shuttle's graveyard 2010 deadline has
already been taken (secretly) NASA cannot afford to postpone launches by
months.

Wasnt 118 supposed to go in late June ?

What would prevent NASA from launching Atlantis on june 8th and
Endeavour at end of June ?

baalke@earthlink.net11 Apr 2007 17:00
April 10, 2007

Allard Beutel
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-4769

Kyle Herring
Johnson Space Center, Houston
281-483-5111

RELEASE: 07-83

NASA TARGETS JUNE LAUNCH FOR SPACE SHUTTLE ATLANTIS

WASHINGTON - NASA is targeting June 8 as the next possible launch
opportunity for space shuttle Atlantis' STS-117 mission to the
International Space Station.

Tuesday's decision by agency management followed a meeting that
reviewed the progress in repairing insulating foam on the shuttle's
external fuel tank, which was damaged during a sudden hail storm Feb.
26 at NASA's Kennedy Space Center, Fla. That damage required
engineers to repair approximately 2,660 sites on the tank.

The meeting also included an assessment of using the repaired
external
tank for the STS-117 mission versus swapping to one that arrived last
week from the manufacturing plant in New Orleans. Managers decided to
finish repairs to Atlantis' current tank and use it for STS-117. The
tank that arrived Friday will be prepared for space shuttle
Endeavour's STS-118 mission to the space station and now is targeted
for launch in August.

"The workforce has done an amazing job of assessing and repairing the
tank so far, but the sheer volume of repairs dictates moving the
launch target to June," said Space Shuttle Program Manager Wayne
Hale.

June 8 is the opening of the next available launch window for
Atlantis
to go to the station. STS-117 Commander Rick Sturckow, Pilot Lee
Archambault and mission specialists Jim Reilly, Patrick Forrester,
Steven Swanson and John "Danny" Olivas will continue training at
NASA's Johnson Space Center, Houston. During the 11-day mission, the
astronauts will work with the station crew and ground teams to
install a new, girder-like truss segment, unfold a new set of solar
arrays and retract one array on the starboard side of the station.

For more information about the STS-117 crew and mission, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov/shuttle

-end-

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.