Re: Orion capsule tests lithobraking again

If that were true, it still would be more of a contribution than
anything you have done.

...Doubtful. Anyway, I'll have all the information I need on you
shortly. Thanks for finally having the guts to admit who you really
are. "Jim". It proves you *lied* when you said you had "nothing to do"
with my being banned from NSF. A liar *and* a coward.

And one we don't need working for NASA, even if it's as a janitor.

...No, one look at those photos, and if that's really you, I see
"janitor" as well as "catamite".

                              OM

--

 ]=====================================[
 ]   OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld   [
 ]        Let's face it: Sometimes you *need*         [
 ]          an obnoxious opinion in your day!           [
 ]=====================================[

What you don't mean " Nice try"?  I know that you have accounts on
NSF, that's why I posted the links.

As for " janitorial services", that is just more sour grapes and
loser's remorse.

...Uh-huh. Nice try, "Jim". Guess you forgot that I'm using TOR now,
and have three hoze accounts on NSF. Either way, even if your claims
were true, janitorial services don't count.

                              OM

--

 ]=====================================[
 ]   OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld   [
 ]        Let's face it: Sometimes you *need*         [
 ]          an obnoxious opinion in your day!           [
 ]=====================================[

Ok a.shole

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=4376.msg68581#msg68581

http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=606.msg19586#msg19586

...Because you'll expose yourself as a lying troll, just like ~CT.

...It's actually *you* that doesn't matter.

Coward.

                              OM

--

 ]=====================================[
 ]   OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld   [
 ]        Let's face it: Sometimes you *need*         [
 ]          an obnoxious opinion in your day!           [
 ]=====================================[

You are a fool if you think I am going to put my name on here,  People
that matter know who I am.

...Oh, and in case you thought we'd forgotten, you *still* have yet to
explain and/or verify your claims that you "go to work, I do more in
the space program than you ever will in your lifetime". This failure
to back up your claims with verifiable source cites just puts you in
the same troll category as ~CT.

So either put up or shut up. Coward.

                              OM

--

 ]=====================================[
 ]   OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld   [
 ]        Let's face it: Sometimes you *need*         [
 ]          an obnoxious opinion in your day!           [
 ]=====================================[

Actually, the world would be better off if you did.

Also, I have yet to see one positive contribution by you to any
forum.  Most of your posts are just comments andpathetic attempts at
school yard humor and are void of any real substance.

Additionally, better to have a "snotty attitude" than to be a plain
a.shole.

...As if anyone has anything to gain from your snotty attitude, terse
and incorrect babbling attempts at "answering", and your pathetic
inability to trim your quotes.

Again, just f.ck off and die, Charlie. Either one would suffice,
although the latter would be preferable.

                              OM

--

 ]=====================================[
 ]   OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld   [
 ]        Let's face it: Sometimes you *need*         [
 ]          an obnoxious opinion in your day!           [
 ]=====================================[

Your loss.  And no one has anything to gain from you.

...Excuse me, but I believe I asked someone who has credibility, not a
lying catamitic troll like you. Begone.

                              OM

--

 ]=====================================[
 ]   OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld   [
 ]        Let's face it: Sometimes you *need*         [
 ]          an obnoxious opinion in your day!           [
 ]=====================================[

Most of the components were carried over.  Block II added more
components such as docking hardware,tunnel and rendezvous equipment .
Also modifications
necessary for compatibility with the LM, structural changes to reduce
weight or improve CSM center of gravity, and critical systems
changes.

On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:51:04 -0500, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
<mooregr_delet3th1s@greenms.com> wrote:

...Yeah, and IIRC there were quire a few Block I components that
continued to be tested after Block I was canned for suitability in
either Block II and/or the possibility of using Block I leftover
capsules for any Apollo Applications Projects that required an
unmanned capsule. Might be a question to pose over on Secret Projects
with regards to AAP possibly using Block I leftovers.

Jorge? Any known concise lists of components that carried over
directly from Block I to Block II with little or no modification?

                              OM

--

 ]=====================================[
 ]   OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld   [
 ]        Let's face it: Sometimes you *need*         [
 ]          an obnoxious opinion in your day!           [
 ]=====================================[

Correct.  I'd argue there were enough difference between Block I and Block
II to matter here.

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:41:55 -0500, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
<mooregr_delet3th1s@greenms.com> astonishingly responded to known
troll bbo hallr:

...Greg, I'm actually drawing a blank here on this one. I *know* there
were some testing on Apollo components that were declared cancelled
and/or obsolete, but I can't goddamn remember any specific ones. Are
we referring primarily to Block I hardware in this case?

                OM

Yes.

Testing a system thats already been declared dead:(

Did nasa do any of this during apollo?

Don't know; NASA Watch is digging around for info on all of this:
http://nasawatch.com/archives/2010/02/another-orion-p.html

Pat

Camera gear aboard the capsule?

Dave

Another drop test of the recovery system ended up the same way the first
one did, with a smashed test capsule:
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2010/02/unlucky-orion-crashing-space-program-drop
-test-fails/
No photos or video available yet.

Pat