Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / December 2003



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

slightly OT, on the ISS

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Brian Gaff - 16 Dec 2003 11:51 GMT
OK, I know there is a group for it, but there has been chat on here and I
notice, an increasing interest in other non shuttle topics, so...

There does seem to be an increasing failure rate for equipment on the ISS,
of late, some of it quite important, by the look of it, and I just wondered
about reliability in general.

Eyebrows were raised when it became clear that a Shuttle need much more
repairs and maintenance after a flight than was advertised, and it looks to
me as if the  equipment in the ISS is going the same way.

Now is it just that we cannot get it right, or are the parts that fail just
impossible to make work long term? I know its comparing apples with Fish,
but those Voyager craft still seem to be working in very severe
environments.

My worry is that OK, its fine in Earth orbit, as you can always come home,
but if you are on the moon, or en route to Mars when you need a spare part,
you are probably in severe risk of being dead.

In my view, one of the real  lessons that  should be being learned in the
ISS, is what can go wrong and finding ways to stop it.

Comments>? Are there any texts on this sort of thing? I seem to recall lots
of living under the sea etc, programs in the past, but you don't get
bombarded by cosmic rays and heated and cooled every 90 minutes there!

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
____________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________
Michael Smith - 23 Dec 2003 10:45 GMT
> I know its comparing apples with Fish,
> but those Voyager craft still seem to be working in very severe
> environments.

Actually I think space is one of the best places for electronic equipment, particularly in trajectories which provide a stable thermal environment.
Signature

Michael Smith
Mail address and GPG key available from www.netapps.com.au

Brian Gaff - 23 Dec 2003 11:14 GMT
What?

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
____________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________
Michael Smith - 25 Dec 2003 11:54 GMT
> What?

Resending without the gpg signature. Perhaps that made it unreadable for you?

quote...
> I know its comparing apples with Fish,
> but those Voyager craft still seem to be working in very severe
> environments.

Actually I think space is one of the best places for electronic equipment, particularly in trajectories which provide a stable thermal environment.
Signature

Michael Smith
Mail address and GPG key available from www.netapps.com.au

Explorer8939 - 25 Dec 2003 16:11 GMT
Actually, your premise is false. Most equipment is holding up well at
ISS. What you hear about are the exceptions, which are notable by
their rarety.

> OK, I know there is a group for it, but there has been chat on here and I
> notice, an increasing interest in other non shuttle topics, so...
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.551 / Virus Database: 343 - Release Date: 11/12/03
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.