> They didn't do a damn thing, after all.
> Or maybe you peoples know something I don't. Educate me.

Signature
JRF
Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
>> Or maybe you peoples know something I don't. Educate me.
>
> I'd like to see a verifiable reference for your $25B figure. If you mean
> "billion", that sounds about two orders of magnitude too high.
I can't find it now, but yeah, was a recent article (Perhaps from the
Houston Chronicle?) where it stated that the expected cost to FEMA for the
manpower-intensive search across the states for months was in the
neighborhood of about $200 to $250 million, and could be higher if more
information is tallied and additional requests from the states submitted.
For the FEMA - that's definitely about 1% of the claimed $25B figure (or
'two orders of magnitude' as Jorge put it). Whomever told the original
poster that $25B figure for the Columbia accident is pulling their leg.
At least another $150-200M or so, NASA also has to pick up due to the
Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) costs and other
accident-related expenses.
Perhaps the $25B is the total FEMA agency budget for the entire year,
spanning all possible disasters? That's the only way I can even imagine
such a large number. Incidentally, that number is about twice of NASA's
*entire* annual budget (for manned and unmanned space programs as well as
aeronautical research).
-Dan
Andrew Gray - 12 Oct 2003 22:18 GMT
>> I'd like to see a verifiable reference for your $25B figure. If you mean
>> "billion", that sounds about two orders of magnitude too high.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> neighborhood of about $200 to $250 million, and could be higher if more
> information is tallied and additional requests from the states submitted.
CAIB Report, Vol. I, pp 47:
"The Federal Emergency Management Agency, which directed the overall
[debris recovery] effort, expended more than $305 million to fund the
search. This cost does not include what NASA spent on aircraft support
or the wages of hundreds of civil servants employed at the recovery area
and in analysis roles at NASA centers."
$25 billion, at a guess, is closer to the cost of the program since
Challenger than the cost to clean up after Columbia. The FY 2003 budget
for FEMA is $6.4bn, in fact...

Signature
-Andrew Gray
shimgray@bigfoot.com
PDR - 13 Oct 2003 17:10 GMT
> For the FEMA - that's definitely about 1% of the claimed $25B figure (or
> 'two orders of magnitude' as Jorge put it). Whomever told the original
> poster that $25B figure for the Columbia accident is pulling their leg.
Unless this figure is supposed to represent the cost of the investigation
plus the right-off value of the asset (one space shuttle - low milage, full
service history etc etc).
I haven't a clue what the current asset value or the replacement value of
the shuttle would be, but I could accept that $25Bn might be the starting
point on the insurance claim form.
PDR
Andrew Gray - 16 Oct 2003 03:48 GMT
> Unless this figure is supposed to represent the cost of the investigation
> plus the right-off value of the asset (one space shuttle - low milage, full
> service history etc etc).
Even so, it's *high*... the *program* cost is a few billion a year.
> I haven't a clue what the current asset value or the replacement value of
> the shuttle would be, but I could accept that $25Bn might be the starting
> point on the insurance claim form.
Book value... um... maybe about a tenth of that. Five billion, if you
really stretch it, include inflation and chalk a good chunk of the
development costs as costs of building Columbia.
Replacement cost; the figure of $2bn was given once, off-the-cuff,
nothing else as far as I can tell; probably a chunk more. Unlikely to be
over $5bn.

Signature
-Andrew Gray
shimgray@bigfoot.com
> > They didn't do a damn thing, after all.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I'd like to see a verifiable reference for your $25B figure. If you mean
> "billion", that sounds about two orders of magnitude too high.
Ken asked me to take care of his light work on this.
How exactly do YOU benefit from the government involvement in these
staged events? Contractor? Worker for a wonderful company like IBM -
a unindicted co-conspirator for all the evils they have helped
facilitate?
The information related to us - by fox news, no less - was that the
bill for the shuttle disaster was $75B, and that FEMA had accounted
for $25B of that.
Sounds like all those people you name who were working so hard in the
search of "truth" were out there having a party in Texas. Wonder if
it included any pig-pickin's there in Crawford.
A friend of mine got some of that space junk for a song from a dealer
down in Texas. One of about 100 pieces that dude had, was what my
friend told me. And that dude had some friends.... it goes on and on.
That song and dance the federal government gave us about the
volatility of the junk was just their way of TRYING to keep us small.
Don't EVAH forget it people - we are the bosses of these people and we
are going to be holding them accountable for the error of their ways
AND their other excesses.
And as for anyone arguing that no citizens should have any of the
space junk just remember that we are the ones that paid for it, the
government that allowed it to happen and the government that
double-billed us for all their monday morning quarterbacking.
So Jorge,
Come on down to North Carolina and get the asswhuppin' you have coming
to you. And bring all your fuckin' yankee buddies wit'cha too. Bring
your expense cards with all of youse though, cause it's gonna take you
a few of those continential breakfasts before you bring us to heel.
And you might better bring some pine boxes for your friends too!
They'll need them for the ride back home.
Is that strong enough for you or would you like to come back for some
second helpings.
Kathy
Greg D. Moore (Strider) - 15 Oct 2003 01:23 GMT
> The information related to us - by fox news, no less - was that the
> bill for the shuttle disaster was $75B, and that FEMA had accounted
> for $25B of that.
Fine. Show us a URL then.
> Sounds like all those people you name who were working so hard in the
> search of "truth" were out there having a party in Texas. Wonder if
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> down in Texas. One of about 100 pieces that dude had, was what my
> friend told me. And that dude had some friends.... it goes on and on.
In other words, you're advertising that your friend committed a felony.
Nice friend.
Jorge R. Frank - 15 Oct 2003 01:44 GMT
> The information related to us - by fox news, no less - was that the
> bill for the shuttle disaster was $75B, and that FEMA had accounted
> for $25B of that.
I'd like to see a reference, then. Fox News has an archive of their news
stories on their web site, and I found no article that supports such a
figure. The AP, Washington Times, Newsday, Houston Chronicle, and many
other sources cite a figure of $400 million, of which around $250 million
was FEMA.
> A friend of mine got some of that space junk for a song from a dealer
> down in Texas. One of about 100 pieces that dude had, was what my
> friend told me. And that dude had some friends.... it goes on and on.
Better make sure the FBI doesn't find out. I'm sure your friend will thank
you for ratting him out.
> That song and dance the federal government gave us about the
> volatility of the junk was just their way of TRYING to keep us small.
I wouldn't bet on it. A little nitrogen tetroxide can ruin your whole day.

Signature
JRF
Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
Herb Schaltegger - 15 Oct 2003 02:17 GMT
(Snipped a bunch of factually incorrect, arrogantly ignorant, and
maliciously stupid nonsense)
Please, just do us all a favor and stop cross-posting your spewage to
sci.space.shuttle.
<PLONK!>

Signature
Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D.
Reformed Aerospace Engineer
"Heisenberg might have been here."
~ Anonymous
dave schneider - 29 Oct 2003 19:24 GMT
[...]
> How exactly do YOU benefit from the government involvement in these
> staged events? Contractor? Worker for a wonderful company like IBM -
> a unindicted co-conspirator for all the evils they have helped
> facilitate?
No, Jorge writes reading comprehension tests for USENET.
/dps