Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / September 2003



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Media Invited To See Space Shuttle Atlantis Preparations

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ron Baalke - 23 Sep 2003 16:38 GMT
Melissa Motichek
Headquarters, Washington               September 23, 2003
(Phone: 202/358-1272)

Bruce Buckingham
Kennedy Space Center, Fla.
(Phone: 321/867-2468)

NOTE TO EDITORS: 03-094

MEDIA INVITED TO SEE SPACE SHUTTLE ATLANTIS PREPARATIONS

    The media is invited to tour the Orbiter Processing
Facility (OPF) at NASA's Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and to
see the Space Shuttle Atlantis, as it is prepared for Return
to Flight. The tour is Friday, Sept. 26.

Reporters will see work in progress on Atlantis, including
the reinstallation of the Reinforced Carbon-Carbon panels on
the Shuttle's wing leading edge; wiring inspections; and
checks of the Shuttle's engines in the Orbital Maneuvering
System. NASA Vehicle Manager Scott Thurston will be
available to discuss the work and answer questions.

The tour is divided into three sessions. The first departs
the KSC Press Site at 9 a.m. EDT and is reserved for TV
reporters and videographers. The next two sessions, designed
for print reporters and still photographers, leave the press
site at approximately 10 a.m. and 11 a.m. Space is limited.
Access will be granted on a first-requested basis and
limited to two persons per organization.

Media who want to attend this event must contact the KSC
Press Site (321/867-2468) by close of business Wednesday.
The sessions will not be carried on NASA Television.

Media without KSC credentials should submit their requests
via fax (321/867-2692) and include the following
information:
?    Full legal name
?    Title
?    Organization
?    Address
?    Telephone number
?    Date of birth
?    Place of birth
?    Social security number
?    Country of citizenship

Since the OPF is an operational facility that deals in
hazardous materials, all who enter must be properly dressed
in long pants and closed-toe shoes with low heels.
Sleeveless shirts are not allowed.

For the latest information on NASA's Return to Flight
efforts on the Internet, visit:

http://www.nasa.gov

-end-
ed kyle - 24 Sep 2003 15:07 GMT
> Melissa Motichek
> Headquarters, Washington               September 23, 2003
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> the reinstallation of the Reinforced Carbon-Carbon panels on
> the Shuttle's wing leading edge ...

I hope these reporters ask the obvious questions as they
watch the hardware that failed on Columbia being attached,
unmodified, to the next orbiter scheduled to fly...

- Ed Kyle
Herb Schaltegger - 24 Sep 2003 15:30 GMT
> > Melissa Motichek
> > Headquarters, Washington               September 23, 2003
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>  - Ed Kyle

I hope, instead, they ask if the ET foam shedding - the issue that
CAUSED that hardware to fail - has been resolved.

Pointing fingers at the RCC for not surviving launch conditions it was
never supposed to encounter isn't particularly constructive (or fair to
the designers of the RCC and wing leading edge components).

Signature

Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D.
Reformed Aerospace Engineer
"Heisenberg might have been here."
    ~ Anonymous

ed kyle - 25 Sep 2003 03:49 GMT
> > > Melissa Motichek
> > > Headquarters, Washington               September 23, 2003
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> never supposed to encounter isn't particularly constructive (or fair to
> the designers of the RCC and wing leading edge components).

A good reporter would ask the question:  Are you going to fly this
thing without "beefing up" the RCC as recommended by the CAIB in its
final report?  It is a fair question.

If the answer is "RCC was not designed to survive the hit it took,"
then the follow-up questions should be:  "Could it be re-engineered
to take such hits, or even to take smaller hits?  If not, is it
possible to add a back-up insulation system in case RCC is breached
in the future?"

- Ed Kyle
Brian Thorn - 24 Sep 2003 23:30 GMT
>> Reporters will see work in progress on Atlantis, including
>> the reinstallation of the Reinforced Carbon-Carbon panels on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>watch the hardware that failed on Columbia being attached,
>unmodified, to the next orbiter scheduled to fly...

The RCC was the victim, not the cause. Its specs clearly read "no
debris impacts allowed."

Brian
Hallerb - 25 Sep 2003 01:07 GMT
>The RCC was the victim, not the cause. Its specs clearly read "no
>debris impacts allowed."
>
>Brian

BUT. Since its clear they can be damaged or destroyed they should be redesigned
BEFORE return to flight.

This rush to save NASA by flying fast is likely to kill the organization long
term.

If we have another accident LOTS of questions are going to be asked. NASA
better have some good answers for things like....

Not redesigning RCC before return to flight.No quick emergency supplies to
orbit  Not reviewing and requalifying all safety waivers etc etc etc.

They arent doing enough...
ed kyle - 25 Sep 2003 03:53 GMT
> >> Reporters will see work in progress on Atlantis, including
> >> the reinstallation of the Reinforced Carbon-Carbon panels on
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> The RCC was the victim, not the cause. Its specs clearly read "no
> debris impacts allowed."

I think the second CAIB recommendation, after reducing ET shedding,
was to beef up the RCC.  Referring to a flawed original spec is not
going to satisfy a good science reporter.

- Ed Kyle
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.