Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / April 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

STS-51-F (the ATO abort)..

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gatorcountyr - 23 Apr 2008 19:39 GMT
After they decided to ATO, Houston made calls indicating first "limits
to enable" then later "limits to inhibit"...

What exactly did they mean by this?
Mika Takala - 23 Apr 2008 20:10 GMT
> After they decided to ATO, Houston made calls indicating first "limits
> to enable" then later "limits to inhibit"...
>
> What exactly did they mean by this?

A ground controller, person who is looking at the telemetry data, saw that
the engine had been shut down because of failing sensors, and the engine
itself was fine. He then saw similar things happening on a set of sensors
for another engine, so he commanded the capcom to tell the crew to disable
those sensors - in another words, inhibiting the control systems from
reacting to out-of-limits data output from the sensors. That then preventing
the engine control logic from shutting down the engine that was in danger of
being shut down without a valid reason.

There have been previous usenet discussions of this subject. One of them
points out that if another engine had been shut down as threathened, the ET
would have made a hard, unsafe and unacceptable landing to Saudi-Arabia, and
the Orbiter would perhaps have tried a TAL or AOA abort.

This was one of the cases in which ground controller saved the day.

Signature

Mika Takala

Jorge R. Frank - 24 Apr 2008 00:42 GMT
>> After they decided to ATO, Houston made calls indicating first "limits
>> to enable" then later "limits to inhibit"...
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> This was one of the cases in which ground controller saved the day.

Mostly correct. The only really glaring error:

The BOOSTER flight controller was a "she" (Jenny Howard), not a "he".
Gatorcountyr - 24 Apr 2008 02:15 GMT
On Apr 23, 3:10 pm, "Mika Takala"
<mika.tak...@INVALIDpp.nic.fi.invalid> wrote:

> > After they decided to ATO, Houston made calls indicating first "limits
> > to enable" then later "limits to inhibit"...
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> --
> Mika Takala

Awesome!
Thank you so much for the detailed answer.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.