 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI SpaceKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Space Forum / Shuttle / March 2008STS-104 Night landing at KSC
No clear indication of APU venting: http://spaceflightnow.com/station/stage7a/010724land/ JTM On Mar 29, 3:35 pm, "max...@mission51l.com" <max...@mission51l.com> wrote: > No clear indication of APU venting: > > http://spaceflightnow.com/station/stage7a/010724land/ > > JTM They are always "venting", just not visible flames On Mar 29, 4:39 pm, charliexmur...@yahoo.com wrote: > On Mar 29, 3:35 pm, "max...@mission51l.com" <max...@mission51l.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > They are always "venting", just not visible flames If "venting visible flames" suits you better, wear it. Anyone following my posts knows what I meant. JTM Funnily enough, and I do not know if this is relevant here, most of the newer tv cameras tend to respond to Infra red as red a lot more than the older cameras used to. I guess this is the newer ccd technology, I have no idea. It came up some time ago on some pictures of an exhaust on a motoring program which I of course never saw... What you folk need is an eye witness of a landing in the same conditions as the last one who was at both. You may have better luck with comparing proper film taken at both, as most recent photos will probably be using digital cameras, and hence have similar colour temp issues in the infra red. Just saying. Brian  SignatureBrian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ On Mar 29, 4:39 pm, charliexmur...@yahoo.com wrote: > On Mar 29, 3:35 pm, "max...@mission51l.com" <max...@mission51l.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > They are always "venting", just not visible flames If "venting visible flames" suits you better, wear it. Anyone following my posts knows what I meant. JTM As I explained in one of my posts, NASA has removed access to the relevant images. If you want to take Charlie's word for whatever humidity and such he's seen, feel free. > Funnily enough, and I do not know if this is relevant here, most of the > newer tv cameras tend to respond to Infra red as red a lot more than the [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > JTM |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.