Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / March 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Question about order of assembly

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Doe - 03 Mar 2008 21:37 GMT
What is the reason that NASA has decided to launch the labs before
completing the solar arrays ?

I was under the impression that flying with unmatched solar arrays was
not desirable due to uneven drag on the station and that getting them to
be balanced would have been a priority ?

Is this an issue with specific shuttles being required for the labs
and/or the array and the maintenance cycle of shuttles just left a long
gap between array carrying flights ?

Or was there some political push to launch the foreign labs as soon as
they had enough power  and take a risk of leaving the station
permanently unbalanced should the shuttle be grounded for a long
time/permanently before the final array is shipped ?

Does Nasa now do anything with regards to array orientation to mitigate
the asymetric config ? (aka: reduce angle on the port arrays to reduce
drag on that side to try to match drag on starboard side).
Mike Ross - 03 Mar 2008 23:53 GMT
> What is the reason that NASA has decided to launch the labs before
> completing the solar arrays ?
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> the asymetric config ? (aka: reduce angle on the port arrays to reduce
> drag on that side to try to match drag on starboard side).

The drag isn't that big a deal, it's more the various ratios of the
principal moments of inertia, which was bad before 12A.  NASA has bigger
problems with the pitted SARJ bearing on the starboard side, keeping that
array from rotating with the port side.  

Besides, the modules are the main point of the station, so as soon as the
power and infrastructure was available, they were launched.

Mike Ross
behlingjo@gmail.com - 04 Mar 2008 01:39 GMT
> Or was there some political push to launch the foreign labs as soon as
> they had enough power  and take a risk of leaving the station
> permanently unbalanced should the shuttle be grounded for a long
> time/permanently before the final array is shipped ?

Bingo

> Does Nasa now do anything with regards to array orientation to mitigate
> the asymetric config ? (aka: reduce angle on the port arrays to reduce
> drag on that side to try to match drag on starboard side).

No big deal.  The attitude control system has sufficient control
authority
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.