Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / December 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ECO sensor operation theory

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
groups@pdrap.org - 10 Dec 2007 02:52 GMT
Hi, I searched around without success for a description of how the ECO
sensor works. Does it detect a change in capacitance in the platinum
wire grid when immersed in cryogenic fuel?

Thanks,

Patrick
Sir Frederick - 10 Dec 2007 07:08 GMT
>Hi, I searched around without success for a description of how the ECO
>sensor works. Does it detect a change in capacitance in the platinum
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Patrick
My guess is that it is a delta resistance sensor. With either
E(measures) = I(fixed) x R(temperature) or
I(measured) = E(fixed) / R(temperature).
Any flaws in the sensor wire, connecting wires, connectors, or
joints (solder or wield) can cause instability and error. And that
over the extreme temperatures involved. The measured resistance
delta is probably quite small. Self heating must be considered.
Self heating may be part of the actual usage process as the
thing is immersed in liquid H2 or not. A problem is that the very
surrounding air(N2?) is going to liquefy and freeze. The various
joint mechanical stresses must be quite large.

The physics doesn't care about the politics of the issues.
Sir Frederick - 11 Dec 2007 04:14 GMT
>>Hi, I searched around without success for a description of how the ECO
>>sensor works. Does it detect a change in capacitance in the platinum
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>The physics doesn't care about the politics of the issues.
Some potentially useful background info :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resistance_thermometer

While temperature is not the primary interest,
thermal properties of the surrounding medium
is probably the prime indicator, those properties can be
inferred from the self heating of the transducer.
From the article the temperature coefficient of resistance
is about .00385 ohms per degree centigrade per
ohm of nominal resistance.

From the article :
"Commercial platinum grades are produced which exhibit a change of resistance of 0.385 ohms/°C (European Fundamental Interval) The
sensor is usually made to have a resistance of 100O at 0 °C. This is defined in BS EN 60751:1996. The American Fundamental Interval
is 0.392 O/°C.

Resistance thermometers require a small current to be passed through in order to determine the resistance. This can cause resistive
heating, and manufacturers' limits should always be followed along with heat path considerations in design. Care should also be
taken to avoid any strains on the resistance thermometer in its application. Lead wire resistance should be considered, and adopting
three and four wire connections can eliminate connection lead resistance effects from measurements."
rgerhards - 12 Dec 2007 15:05 GMT
I compiled an article with an in-depth view at the ECO sensor system.
It's at

http://spacelaunch.gerhards.net/2007/12/space-shuttle-eco-sonsors-in-depth-view.html

There are also a number of pictures, schematics and a few interesting
quotes from the STS-114 ECO sensor incident. Comments and additions
are most welcome.

Rainer
snidely - 15 Dec 2007 04:29 GMT
> I compiled an article with an in-depth view at the ECO sensor system.
> It's at
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> quotes from the STS-114 ECO sensor incident. Comments and additions
> are most welcome.

Good stuff.  I saw the pics on the NASA shuttle site last week, but
you put a good  context around them, and then also mine the earlier
report.

Count me among those who are interested in how the tests during the
countdown are done.

/dps
Rainer Gerhards - 17 Dec 2007 07:54 GMT
> Count me among those who are interested in how the tests during the
> countdown are done.

It looks like they have at least one serious suspect:

http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5309

It will be a very interesting day tomorrow :)

Rainer
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.