Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / November 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Attempting some  semi on topic stuff!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Brian Gaff - 18 Nov 2007 09:03 GMT
I listened to the sts 122 briefings etc, and a couple of questions came up
in my mind.

Firstly, if they are going to, look at the Sarj in one of the eva's,
presumably this means they have suspicions and need to see if they are
right, but in the briefings they seemed a little evasive on this point.

To me, it almost sounds like something was missed in final inspection, like
some swarf or debris which go in there and has been pulverised by the
rotation and thermal conditions and worn the  bearing plate to some extent.

I was also confused about the shuttle power transfer cables. It is suggested
that  connecting these is going to be done by expedition 16 eva later this
month, yet the eva description seems to suggest that these are being routed
on a shuttle eva, so will the shuttle be able to use station power or not?

Lastly, on the rcc problem. Looks like an aging problem but then again, they
have apparently had a few on earlier missions. Its not surprising to me that
at the edge of a formed component that the packing density is lower than on
the body of the material. I'm not sure why this was apparently surprising.
One would have thought extra insulation would be built in to compensate.

Brian

Signature

Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Derek Lyons - 18 Nov 2007 18:06 GMT
>Firstly, if they are going to, look at the Sarj in one of the eva's,
>presumably this means they have suspicions and need to see if they are
>right, but in the briefings they seemed a little evasive on this point.

They are probably evasive because they really don't know yet...  They
really have not had time to complete the analysis from the last
flight, the results of which will be the chief driver in the next
survey.

D.
Signature

Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL

Brian Thorn - 18 Nov 2007 22:25 GMT
>I listened to the sts 122 briefings etc, and a couple of questions came up
>in my mind.
>
>Firstly, if they are going to, look at the Sarj in one of the eva's,
>presumably this means they have suspicions and need to see if they are
>right, but in the briefings they seemed a little evasive on this point.

They don't know yet. Once the debris is analyzed, they'll have a good
idea what is broken, but they'll need to go out and look to make sure,
and to see if more than one of them is broken.

>I was also confused about the shuttle power transfer cables. It is suggested
>that  connecting these is going to be done by expedition 16 eva later this
>month, yet the eva description seems to suggest that these are being routed
>on a shuttle eva, so will the shuttle be able to use station power or not?

It is irrelevant to STS-122. Atlantis does not have the SSPTS.

Brian
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.