Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / May 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Berndt Sez:  "Failure is an Option"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John Maxson - 10 Sep 2003 14:15 GMT
====================
From: Jon S. Berndt (a@b.c)
Subject: Re: Something for John Maxson to Read
Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle
Date: 2003-06-14 17:40:04 PST

>>As long as humans are running the space program there will be management
>>lapses, engineering lapses, process breakdowns, mistakes, failures, and
>>setbacks, as well as progress, success, and achievement.  They are
>>inseparable, because we are imperfect.  It's been that way since the
>>invention of the wheel. The sooner we accept that and renew our
>>commitment to learn from our mistakes, the better.
>>
>>Jon

Hallerb (apparently) replied:

> Thats fine but evidently NASA forgot the lessons of challenger. How sad.

You wouldn't have a clue.  There are well-documented reports about the
hardware changes that were undertaken and implemented.  Process changes that
happened as a result of Challenger are still in place.  It's not a stretch
to say that perhaps *some* lessons were being forgotten, but your blanket
simplistic statement is bunk.]

[Bob's remark is the kind of asinine and ignorant remark (in an endless line
of ignorant and brainless remarks) that led me to filter Mr. Haller.  I
still see some remarks via replies, though, and this one needed addressing.]
=======================
Kent Betts - 11 Sep 2003 20:38 GMT
> and this one needed addressing.]
> =======================

What needs addressing is your calculated and dishonest choice of a
subject heading.

">>As long as humans are running the space program there will be
management
>>lapses, engineering lapses, process breakdowns, mistakes, failures, and
>>setbacks, as well as progress, success, and achievement.  They are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>>Jon

John Maxson
"Hallerb's remark is the kind of asinine and ignorant remark (in an
endless line
of ignorant and brainless remarks)"

Your choice of subject heading seems no better than hallerb. "Berndt
says failure is an option."  The fact is you just sit around trying to
think up ways to be foul.
Jon Berndt - 12 Sep 2003 13:39 GMT
"Kent Betts" <kent_betts@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> Your [John Maxson's] choice of subject heading seems no better than
hallerb. "Berndt
> says failure is an option."  The fact is you [John Maxson] just sit around
trying to
> think up ways to be foul.

The fact is, he's run out of valid arguments for an SRB crossing.

Jon
John Maxson - 12 Sep 2003 14:18 GMT
How many do you need to see presented in this forum?

I've presented more than enough for any reasonable person
with eyesight.  I'm happy to see you admit that they are valid.

As you know, my published book is full of valid conclusions
about the fireball crossing.  Many other valid arguments (of a
more technical nature) are set forth in my unpublished books.

Any engineer worth his salt would answer my question about
Kranz and Lee.  (Hold the pepper.)

--
John Thomas Maxson, Retired Engineer (Aerospace)
Author, The Betrayal of Mission 51-L (www.mission51l.com)

> The fact is, he's run out of valid arguments for an SRB crossing.
>
> Jon
Scott M. Kozel - 12 Sep 2003 23:52 GMT
> How many do you need to see presented in this forum?
>
> I've presented more than enough for any reasonable person
> with eyesight.  I'm happy to see you admit that they are valid.

Your arguments are like blocked punts.

> As you know, my published book is full of valid conclusions
> about the fireball crossing.  Many other valid arguments (of a
> more technical nature) are set forth in my unpublished books.

But you refuse to post them here.

That makes you a troll.
Terrence Daniels - 13 Sep 2003 04:14 GMT
And to think that someone, somewhere, is doing real work in the space
program, without any recognition for their efforts whatsoever. Imagine the
thousands of people busting their butts to keep things running. Contractors,
techs, guys turning the screws, mopping the OPF floor, keeping records,
guarding the buildings, scaring away woodpeckers at the pad, serving lunch
at KSC, whatever. Where is their book? Are they not martyrs too?

If I ever become this useless, I hope somebody suggests that I should go out
in to the woods and shoot myself before I piss away all my dignity. What a
f.cking waste of time, energy, bandwidth, calories, and oxygen.
OM - 13 Sep 2003 11:14 GMT
>Your arguments are like blocked punts.

...Maxson's arguements are like Lucy & Charlie Brown kicking the
football. Only in this case absolutely nobody feels sorry for Charlie
Brown Maxson when he sails through the air and winds up flat on his
back.

                OM

Signature

"No bastard ever won a war by dying for     | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb bastard die for his country."    | Human O-Ring Society

    - General George S. Patton, Jr

Richard Henry - 13 Sep 2003 00:58 GMT
> How many do you need to see presented in this forum?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> about the fireball crossing.  Many other valid arguments (of a
> more technical nature) are set forth in my unpublished books.

So I guess they are unread.  And we are still unconvinced.
OM - 13 Sep 2003 09:06 GMT
John "Chester the Molester" Maxson babbled:

> As you know, my published book is full of valid conclusions

...Your "book" is nothing more than a bound volume of used toilet
paper. Nothing more.

                OM

Signature

"No bastard ever won a war by dying for     | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb bastard die for his country."    | Human O-Ring Society

    - General George S. Patton, Jr

Anonymous - 21 May 2004 22:06 GMT
The Shuttle doesn't go anywhere, just 'round and 'round.  Reminds me of the
Chuck Berry tune.

You might as well sun yourself on a California beach; you'll go 'round and
'round too, just slower.

Going to the Moon isn't much better. Goes 'round and 'round the Earth,
right?  As for Mars -- well it goes 'round and 'round the Sun.

We should sit tight on space exploration until we get our sh.t together and
can build a starship.  Then we can go somewhere that doesn't go 'round and
'round.  Come to think about it, any star you can see just goes 'round and
'round in the Milky Way.  So why bother at all?  

Watch a good sci-fi movie like "Earth vs the Flying Saucers."  Cheap and
more exciting than any space trip you'll see somebody else take on your tax
nickel.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.