Space Forum / Shuttle / September 2007

You call it a "SERIOUS EPISODE OF CENSORSHIP", whereas I call it
mainstream damage control on behalf of insider spooks and moles
covering thy butts and of protecting those butts in charge as having
the most to lose, which means giving credits to anyone outside of
their cult is simply not a viable option.  All it takes is a few of
those insiders in order to make such dastardly things happen is why
99.9% of GOOGLE need not be involved or know a damn thing.

Because you originally proposed and promoted the notions of an X Prize
for privately accomplishing our moon is actually the kind of proof
that you're at least entitled to some credit by name, if not by some
degree of other rewards.  However, what you fail to realize is that
our moon has never been robotic rover accomplished by other than hard-
landings of those semi-impact probes that accomplished very little if
any such roving and much less as having shared the whole truth and
nothing but the truth.

There has also not even been a sustained moon L1 science platform of
any kind, much less of such having shared the day to day and night to
night truths about our physically naked, dark and nasty moon that's
somewhat salty and very much unavoidably gamma and X-ray reactive
(anticathode like, especially via those higher density surface
deposits), that's also double IR hot by day and otherwise cold enough
by night to cause Radon gas to liquify.  Even though impact probe
technology has existed for decades, there's nothing of hard science
about the relative low density core of that unusually pulverised moon
that seemingly took 99% of those meteorite hits on our behalf, that
which should have by now been well enough 3D mapped to show us where
those most likely hollow portions might exist, and of how deep and/or
extensive those interior voids are.

In other words, we still know almost nothing first hand about our
cosmic traumatised, dusty and somewhat salty old moon, whereas a few
soft-landing accomplished rovers should at least start sharing those
surface related truths, of which China or perhaps India stand the best
economics per launched kg of making that happen.

Haven't you folks ever taken an open mindset of any look-see, on
behalf of taking any one on one fair notice, as to how much physically
darker and rather nasty deep golden brownish (as nearly open coal pit
albedo looking) that fully solar illuminated moon actually is, such as
obtained within the very exact same FOV and thus same film or newer
CCD exposure relationship, as to having included mother Earth that's
not even half as bright as Venus would have been depicted.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/
There are actually many other examples of images from orbit as still
offered within those Apollo archives that so far haven't been lost or
intentionally destroyed, as well as more than a few others contributed
ever since, that is if you'd care to honestly look, which proves that
Venus and a few other off-moon items should have been unavoidably
included in such unfiltered Kodak moments.  In addition to hard
photographic science that's fully replicated to death, any fully
interactive 3D orbital simulator will more than prove this out.

Though Venus was always a much smaller crescent item to have included,
though little but nearly three fold brightness to that of Earth should
have been impossible to excluded of what such an unfiltered Kodak
moment should have easily recorded with dynamic range to spare, is
simply further proof positive that our rad-hard astronauts of whatever
"right stuff" makes then into happy campers never set any official
moonboot worth of their human DNA on that physically dark and nasty
moon of ours.

There's simply no freaking way that any of those NASA/Apollo EVA
unfiltered Kodak moments were obtained as having been officially
stipulated, and unfortunately for our NASA/Apollo suck-up freaks of
nature, there's so much more of their very own physics and of the best
available science that doesn't add up on behalf of those NASA/Apollo
missions being the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Unlike that warm and fuzzy government and their faith-based puppeteers
of their forever and ever world that has those unlimited fossil and
yellowcake reserves along with unlimited terrain and vast oceans with
unlimited food to subsequently pillage, rape and pollute, plus that
swarm mindset of their human infrastructure which supposedly never
tells a lie, whereas unfortunately my world has been getting a little
extra toasty, as well as getting down to the spendy dregs of our
fossil energy and the even spendier birth-to-grave aspects of
utilizing yellowcake, thereby my world with it's badly failing
environment continually lies it's federal, state, county and local
infomercial spewing butts off all the time, and it further lies about
and/or excludes upon evidence of whatever's the truth without so much
as offering a speck of remorse, all because their sorted past of
whatever collateral damage and carnage of the innocent, plus locally
spendy fiascos, supposedly doesn't count if any of it happened in the
past (meaning as of any mistakes or pesky over/under sights older than
yesterday doesn't count as long as they're kept in charge of the
future).

If not Russia, it'll likely become China or India to the rescue of
rightfully obtaining that GOOGLE X Prize for accomplishing the task of
roving and snooping about the surface of our moon w/o NASA.  Of
course, Russia for the very same mutually perpetrated cold-war reasons
wouldn't dare be caught dead accomplishing any such thing that would
be so publicly reviewed and unavoidably compared to those supposed
previous moon soft-landings with rover capability, which leaves us
with pondering as to what the likes of China or India should deliver.
Go figure as to why Japan's LUNAR-A mission has been officially on
hold for more than a decade, with one pathetic excuse after another is
what makes an honestly deductive mind wonder as to what's actually
there worth hiding.

The USSR/Russian method had been operating at better than ten fold
more dollar per dollar or per whatever work credit efficient, and
perhaps achieving another ten fold worth of R&D as effectively applied
technology, and thus having been far more capable of their having
affordably accomplished most any given fly-by-rocket robotic task.
They simply didn't bother to orbit the moon in person or much less
walk on the moon because, they didn't want to risk having any more
dead astronauts than necessary, or otherwise to invest in what simply
could not be justified on any basis of demonstrating better physics or
improved science that wasn't already known or simply better
accomplished via orbital probes and robotics.

Getting a one-way science package onto that moon was however
technically doable, although not of any fly-by-rocket soft-lander
configuration that you'd care to invest your frail life of human DNA.
Moon rovers of that mutually perpetrated cold-war era were unlikely to
function due to their given mass, the extremely electrostatic and deep
dust of such a cosmic morgue worth of crystal dry substances offering
extremely little surface tension.  In other words, unless you've
landed upon a rock that's offering a sufficient vertical grade, it's
easy to sink out of sight as based upon those hocus-pocus lander/rover
designs.
- Brad Guth -