Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / May 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Buh-bye Billie..

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
T3 - 25 May 2007 20:23 GMT
"The Navy and NASA have mutually agreed to end his detail to NASA," said
Kylie Clem, a spokeswoman at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston.

http://www.floridatoday.com/floridatoday/blogs/spaceteam/

*Nothing, or no one is as obnoxious as a Gator with BOTH titles*
                               *T3*
hallerb@aol.com - 25 May 2007 21:36 GMT
> "The Navy and NASA have mutually agreed to end his detail to NASA," said
> Kylie Clem, a spokeswoman at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> *Nothing, or no one is as obnoxious as a Gator with BOTH titles*
>                                 *T3*

no surprise there...

nasa wouldnt like every one of his future flights mentioning he was
part of that affair........
John Doe - 26 May 2007 01:28 GMT
> "The Navy and NASA have mutually agreed to end his detail to NASA," said
> Kylie Clem, a spokeswoman at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston.
>
> http://www.floridatoday.com/floridatoday/blogs/spaceteam/

I am disapointed but not surprised.

It would have been more mature for NASA to keep him for at least another
year until the story was forgotten and perhaps give him an opportunity
to return to the NAVY.

And considering that NASA is winding down its manned space programme, it
could have announce astronaut corp reductions and eary retirements for a
few astronauts and include him in the deal.
hallerb@aol.com - 26 May 2007 14:09 GMT
> > "The Navy and NASA have mutually agreed to end his detail to NASA," said
> > Kylie Clem, a spokeswoman at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> could have announce astronaut corp reductions and eary retirements for a
> few astronauts and include him in the deal.

it appears he had a affair with nowack who was married, that shows
really bad judgement, something you DONT want in a astronaut!
JD in TX - 26 May 2007 14:40 GMT
> it appears he had a affair with nowack who was married, that shows
> really bad judgement, something you DONT want in a astronaut!

Yeah, and one day he forgot to take his umbrella when it was raining and
he got wet. This utter lack of foresight is also something you DON'T
want in an astronaut!
Steven L. - 26 May 2007 17:15 GMT
>>> "The Navy and NASA have mutually agreed to end his detail to NASA," said
>>> Kylie Clem, a spokeswoman at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> it appears he had a affair with nowack who was married, that shows
> really bad judgement, something you DONT want in a astronaut!

Oh, please.
In the Military Code of Justice, having a consensual love affair is
*NOT* included under "Conduct unbecoming an officer."

America has had PRESIDENTS who did exactly that, and they did just fine.
 In the 1884 Presidential campaign, Grover Cleveland admitted to
fathering an illegitimate child.  But because he also proved that he had
been paying child support to the child's mom whom he had gotten
pregnant, the public said "Oh well, that's OK then" and Cleveland was
elected President.

Signature

Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:  sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

T3 - 26 May 2007 18:55 GMT
> Oh, please.
> In the Military Code of Justice, having a consensual love affair is *NOT*
> included under "Conduct unbecoming an officer."

You might want to reread the MCJ, I'm fairly sure there somethin' in there
about screwing another officer, consensual, or not. Oh and don't for a
second think I care if "others" have done the same, or for that matter, if
the rule is wrong, or right. The bottom line is he got caught up in it and
brought ill attention and embarassment to the Navy and NASA. Such endeavors
are not usually considered career moves, though in this particular case it
was, as his space career is over, if not the Naval one too...
John Doe - 26 May 2007 20:13 GMT
> You might want to reread the MCJ, I'm fairly sure there somethin' in there
> about screwing another officer, consensual, or not.

If the guy was divorced, then is there really anything preventing him
from dating someone ?

If the lady is still married, then he decision to have an affair is her
responsability. It could be argued that he should have refused to date a
married women. But it can also be argued that he broke off the affair,
so his judgement was OK.

Now, if the military didn't want him, couldn't they have dismissed him
and he then would have become a civilian within NASA ?

This paperwork would have all been done privately without much noise and
fanfare.

The mere fact that we are discussing this mean that NASA is attracting
unwanted attention to this issue. And that is exactly what NASA
shoudln't be doing.
hallerb@aol.com - 26 May 2007 20:22 GMT
> > You might want to reread the MCJ, I'm fairly sure there somethin' in there
> > about screwing another officer, consensual, or not.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> unwanted attention to this issue. And that is exactly what NASA
> shoudln't be doing.

theres no way given what happened for nasa to avoid attention,
letterman and leno love stuff like this.

when he choose to have a affair with a married colleague he knew it
could end his career. no doubt he would of been shocked by the events,
but the outcome, end of career was known in advance.

he can always retire from military and get job wiith private launch
services, the newsworth effect might help them raise funds
Steven L. - 26 May 2007 21:51 GMT
>>> You might want to reread the MCJ, I'm fairly sure there somethin' in there
>>> about screwing another officer, consensual, or not.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> when he choose to have a affair with a married colleague he knew it
> could end his career.

If this had occurred in the private sector, I don't even think the Human
Resources Department could charge a guy with sexual harassment just for
having a consensual relationship with a colleague, married or not,
unless one was the other's direct boss.

If he and she were ever asked by NASA to fly on the same mission, or if
he or she was asked for input into the other's fitness for promotion,
the proper answer is to disqualify oneself on personal reasons.

With so many of us techies spending more and more time at work,
workplace romance is about the only romance we ever get.  And
occasionally you will be attracted to someone, who for some reason
doesn't tell you that she's already married until after you're already
involved with her.  I've been in this exact situation myself, in fact.
I don't see any obvious way to prevent this except taking an oath of
celibacy.

Lisa Nowak is the ONLY one who crossed the line by her violent
confrontation.

Signature

Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:  sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

T3 - 26 May 2007 22:36 GMT
> If this had occurred in the private sector, I don't even think the Human
> Resources Department could charge a guy with sexual harassment just for
> having a consensual relationship with a colleague, married or not, unless
> one was the other's direct boss.

Again, it did not happen in the private sector, they are both active Naval
officers and *both* could face court-martials for fratenization and
infidelity. It might not be a big deal to you,(or me) but, trust me on this,
when it's played out on CNN it becomes a very big deal for NASA Mgmt. as
well as the squids/pukes on the D-ring..

> Lisa Nowak is the ONLY one who crossed the line by her violent
> confrontation.

That's your opinion and an irrelavent one at that. Ms. Nowak's excursion to
MCO aside, both Ofelein and her knew full well going into their relationship
the consequences of discovery.
Bottom line for Billy O, sorry 'bout yer luck, but 'ya gotta go...
Danny Deger - 27 May 2007 03:01 GMT
>> Oh, please.
>> In the Military Code of Justice, having a consensual love affair is *NOT*
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> particular case it was, as his space career is over, if not the Naval one
> too...

Screwing another officer was OK.  Screwing an enlisted lady was/is
fraternization and a BIG no/no.

Danny Deger
John Doe - 27 May 2007 05:57 GMT
> Screwing another officer was OK.  Screwing an enlisted lady was/is
> fraternization and a BIG no/no.

It is moot now since NASA has taken action.

However, it SHOULD be argued that while these people were still
technically part of the military, they were employed by a civilian
organisation and worked outside of their military context. So one has to
wonder if all of the military rules should apply.

For instance, rules about fraternisation for crews in a sub or ship
might not really be applicable to NASA jobs based in Houston (except
during flight).

I think that in the end, this fellow got unfair treatment just because
the media found out about his affair. I am sure there are plenty of
other romances going on and those people are going unpunished.

It is petty of NASA/Military to have taken this action.
robert casey - 27 May 2007 06:13 GMT
> It is petty of NASA/Military to have taken this action.

There's probably still some of that old "Our astronauts are all good
pure all American boy/girl scouts" concept in the back of NASA's
managers's minds.  And an unwritten rule "Don't do anything that makes
for bad press for NASA on the ground."
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.