> As long as they manage to avoid the outter SAA contour, that's all
> that matters, that is unless there's not enough fuel as to reboost
> that big old sucker back to 375+ km.
> -
> Brad Guth
Change your email address again? Why don't you spend that effort on getting
your meds regulated instead?
<PLONK>

Signature
You can run on for a long time,
Sooner or later, God'll cut you down.
~Johnny Cash
hallerb@aol.com - 16 Mar 2007 22:08 GMT
On Mar 16, 3:38�pm, Herb Schaltegger
<herb.schalteg...@gmail.com.INVALID> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:19:20 -0500, bradg...@gmail.com wrote
> (in article <1174076360.672019.289...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>):
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Sooner or later, God'll cut you down.
> ~Johnny Cash
You know a nice evacuated station dropping into the pacific would
solve LOTS of troubles:)
Shuttle budget now zero, better use $$ for CEV
No more risky shuttle flights.
This nice low orbits also easier for terrorists.
bradguth@gmail.com - 17 Mar 2007 05:32 GMT
On Mar 16, 1:08 pm, "hall...@aol.com" <hall...@aol.com> wrote:
> You know a nice evacuated station dropping into the pacific would
> solve LOTS of troubles:)
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> This nice low orbits also easier for terrorists
Correct on all counts. Besides, a few Bigelow POOFs at VL2 would be
so much better, and perhaps even a whole lot less spendy.
One manned mission per 19 month cycle, all others robotic.
-
Brad Guth
bradguth@gmail.com - 17 Mar 2007 05:28 GMT
On Mar 16, 12:38 pm, Herb Schaltegger
<herb.schalteg...@gmail.com.INVALID> wrote:
> Change your email address again? Why don't you spend that effort on getting
> your meds regulated instead?
Always had this email, but then unlike yourself, at least I'm a real
person.
Why are you insider folks always so upset?
-
Brad Guth