Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / September 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Soyuz launch video much better than shuttle's!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Eric - 19 Sep 2006 01:54 GMT
Why don't the shuttle launch videos ever show much video of inside the
cabin?

The Soyuz launch video puts you inside the cabin from the moment the rocket
lights all the way until they are well in orbit!  And the quality of the
video is pretty good.

Its bad a.s and really cool to watch.  The perspective is awesome.  Much
better than watching some little white dot moving across the sky (shuttle).

If the Russians can do it, certaintly NASA should not only be able to do it
to but also do it in high definition!

Yes, I want the eye candy!
David Stribling - 19 Sep 2006 02:13 GMT
I was thinking the exact same thing while watching last night!  I don't have
access to NASA TV, so I watch the streaming video.  This mission is the
first time I have spent very much time watching it and many times I think
"man, NASA's PR bunch just absolutely misses the point".  There is so much
cool footage they could be showing, but they will show the boards at MCC,
and even at that, they are unreadable on streaming.

Even when they do post the extremely cool SRB videos, they either put them
in a crappy format, or stuff them away on some streaming site so you can't
download them (I know Chuck there are ways... ;) ).  As a taxpayer, I feel
like this is my property and I ought to be able to download as high a
resolution as I want.

NASA, are you listening????

Signature

David Stribling
Remove the 2x to reply

> Why don't the shuttle launch videos ever show much video of inside the
> cabin?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Yes, I want the eye candy!
MichaelJP - 19 Sep 2006 09:03 GMT
>I was thinking the exact same thing while watching last night!  I don't
>have access to NASA TV, so I watch the streaming video.  This mission is
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> NASA, are you listening????

Got to agree with that, why don't they make all the HD footage available as
well - it's taxpayers money that paid for it!

And while we're about it, how about a 24/7 streaming webcam from the ISS
looking down on the earth? That would be cool.
Keith Soltys - 19 Sep 2006 12:08 GMT
>Got to agree with that, why don't they make all the HD footage available as
>well - it's taxpayers money that paid for it!
>
>And while we're about it, how about a 24/7 streaming webcam from the ISS
>looking down on the earth? That would be cool.

Very cool and they should have done it years ago. Bandwidth's can't be that
expensive.

I always thought they missed a chance with Walter Cronkite. I'd have loved to
have seen him do a newscast from space, with all of the imagery being the
earth below. Might have changed some people's persepectives on things.

Keith
MichaelJP - 19 Sep 2006 13:24 GMT
>>Got to agree with that, why don't they make all the HD footage available
>>as
>>well - it's taxpayers money that paid for it!

>>And while we're about it, how about a 24/7 streaming webcam from the ISS
>>looking down on the earth? That would be cool.

> Very cool and they should have done it years ago. Bandwidth's can't be
> that
> expensive.

The fact that the view is of the earth moving slowly beneath would mean
you'd get extremely good motion compression I would imagine, even at
reasonable resolution.

And it would have far more impact on more people than any number of obscure
microgravity experiments. I'd have it as my permanent screensaver:)
hallerb@aol.com - 19 Sep 2006 15:24 GMT
> reasonable resolution.
>
> And it would have far more impact on more people than any number of obscure
> microgravity experiments. I'd have it as my permanent screensaver:)

wasnt triana built but never launched for real time video of earth?

cause it was al gores pet project?
snidely - 19 Sep 2006 22:00 GMT
> >And while we're about it, how about a 24/7 streaming webcam from the ISS
> >looking down on the earth? That would be cool.
> >
> Very cool and they should have done it years ago. Bandwidth's can't be that
> expensive.

NASA TV between flights shows lots of this sort of video, from the
payload bay cams.  How often do you watch that?

> I always thought they missed a chance with Walter Cronkite. I'd have loved to
> have seen him do a newscast from space, with all of the imagery being the
> earth below. Might have changed some people's persepectives on things.

I seem to recall (ISTR) that a reporter in space was in the plans for
after Teacher In Space, only to be removed from consideration when
Challenger came apart.

/dps
Vandar - 19 Sep 2006 23:50 GMT
>>>And while we're about it, how about a 24/7 streaming webcam from the ISS
>>>looking down on the earth? That would be cool.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> after Teacher In Space, only to be removed from consideration when
> Challenger came apart.

Miles O'Brien of CNN has said that he was about two weeks away from
announcing he was going on the Shuttle when Columbia broke up. They
shelved the idea afterward.
MichaelJP - 20 Sep 2006 13:19 GMT
>> >And while we're about it, how about a 24/7 streaming webcam from the ISS
>> >looking down on the earth? That would be cool.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> NASA TV between flights shows lots of this sort of video, from the
> payload bay cams.  How often do you watch that?

It's no good just having it at odd times on NASA TV, now the ISS is
established there really is no reason not to have a 24/7 webcam, interrupted
only by LOS or maintenance.
mike@corestore.org - 19 Sep 2006 18:13 GMT
> Got to agree with that, why don't they make all the HD footage available as
> well - it's taxpayers money that paid for it!

<snips>

I could be imagining things - but I thought that I read someplace some
company had done some kind of 'exclusive' deal; they equipped with HD
cameras in return for exclusive commercial rights to the HD footage. Am
I going crazy or did this deal actually happen?

Mike
MichaelJP - 20 Sep 2006 13:17 GMT
>> Got to agree with that, why don't they make all the HD footage available
>> as
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Mike

It did, and NASA should never have done it. Now the HD footage is only
accessible to a very small set of people.
Eric - 20 Sep 2006 19:03 GMT
>> Got to agree with that, why don't they make all the HD footage available
>> as
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Mike

Yep, a government agency sold exclusive rights for profit.

I'm not sure how that works...

Otherwise, "Discovery HD Theater" could, should, and probably would cover
launches!
Eric - 20 Sep 2006 19:05 GMT
>I was thinking the exact same thing while watching last night!  I don't
>have access to NASA TV, so I watch the streaming video.  This mission is
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> NASA, are you listening????

Exactly.  The whole "exclusive rights" for HD video really irks me.  Since
when does a gub'mint agency get off selling exlusive video rights for
profit?
snidely - 19 Sep 2006 22:06 GMT
> Why don't the shuttle launch videos ever show much video of inside the
> cabin?

Evidently this camera doesn't get connected to the live feed (there's
some serious telemetry traffic going on at that time, but the SRB cams
are live).  Occasionally, the tape gets onto the Video Gallery, but it
may or may not get downlinked during flight.  If it sits on the shelf
until landing, it probably won't get on the web site.

> The Soyuz launch video puts you inside the cabin from the moment the rocket
> lights all the way until they are well in orbit!  And the quality of the
> video is pretty good.
>
> Its bad a.s and really cool to watch.  The perspective is awesome.  Much
> better than watching some little white dot moving across the sky (shuttle).

You don't see much besides launch-and-entry suits.  You can tell the
light through the window is changing because the helmets go in and out
of shadow.  You can also see how much smoother the ride is when the
SRBs peel away.

> If the Russians can do it, certaintly NASA should not only be able to do it
> to but also do it in high definition!
>
> Yes, I want the eye candy!

Hey, I like it, too!  Tides me over until my ride comes up   ;-)

/dps
Eric - 20 Sep 2006 19:01 GMT
>> Why don't the shuttle launch videos ever show much video of inside the
>> cabin?
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> /dps

Yeah, sometimes (after a launch) they put out short duration video taken
from inside the shuttle cabin, buts its always very short.  I always
wondered why they never show a long video from inside the cabin.  The angle
isn't all that great (taken from behind the seats), but it would be cool to
watch.  I've seen video taken from inside the shuttle, looking out a side
window, live during a launch but as soon as you really start getting into it
they switch to another feed!  I forget which launch it was, but one was
really cool as you could see the coastline falling away and see the
contrails.  I give them credit for all the other cool video that they do
live, such as the outside shots, but seeing it from a perspective of inside
the cabin is really cool.  The way that angle the camera (looking downward
at the astro^H^H^H^H^H cosmonauts) in the Soyuz launch is like watching a
movie (i.e., Apollo 13).   Its cool watching their stuff animal "good luck
charm" begin to float as they get into orbit...

Yep, exactly!   I look the inside-cabin video for the same reason..  :^)
Mika Takala - 20 Sep 2006 19:09 GMT
> Yeah, sometimes (after a launch) they put out short duration video taken
> from inside the shuttle cabin, buts its always very short.  I always
> wondered why they never show a long video from inside the cabin.  The
> angle

They did show T-30s - T+9min video from inside the flight deck with picture
looking "down" towards the astronauts on mission STS-112 or STS-113 I think.

That video, although not the complete version with numerous abort boundary
calls talked by PLT and CDR,  should be downloadable on www.insideksc.com 
when they get their website back to normal service. The complete video was
only shown once, and I think it is not available for download anywhere :/ -
perhaps nobody managed to capture it. The video that is available, has a
significant part of the ascent between SRB separation and 3G-limiting cut
out, and that is because the couple of replays of the video were shown that
way...

Signature

Mika Takala

Danny Dot - 20 Sep 2006 19:27 GMT
Danny Dot wrote:

> Yeah, sometimes (after a launch) they put out short duration video taken
> from inside the shuttle cabin, buts its always very short.  I always
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Yep, exactly!   I look the inside-cabin video for the same reason..  :^)

As an astronaut instructor during simulation runs, we wanted video of the
crew for the instructors to see.  We were told we would not get it based on
some type of privacy issues.  I suspect something like this for live ascent
video.

But, NASA should have a full length video clip of ascent somewhere in the
archives.  If not they should.  I saw a couple when I was an instructor.  I
can tell you most it is pretty boring.  First stage shakes a lot, second
stage is smooth, the seats "jump" forward at Main Engine Cut Off (MECO).
Jorge R. Frank - 21 Sep 2006 01:31 GMT
> Danny Dot wrote:
>
> As an astronaut instructor during simulation runs, we wanted video of
> the crew for the instructors to see.  We were told we would not get it
> based on some type of privacy issues.  I suspect something like this
> for live ascent video.

There are cameras in the Motion Base now...

Signature

JRF

Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.

Danny Dot - 21 Sep 2006 02:42 GMT
Danny Dot wrote:

>> Danny Dot wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> There are cameras in the Motion Base now...

This is great.  I would have loved to have seen the video of Marsh Ivins
beating Loren Shiver on the head with the Contengency Abort Cue card after
they "died" because Loren didn't obey her on how to run a very compex
contengency abort proceedure.

Danny Dot
www. mobbinggonemad.org

P.S.  All of these procedures are automated now, thanks to John Young.
George Evans - 21 Sep 2006 12:43 GMT
> Why don't the shuttle launch videos ever show much video of inside the
> cabin?
>
> The Soyuz launch video puts you inside the cabin from the moment the rocket
> lights all the way until they are well in orbit!  And the quality of the
> video is pretty good.

With Soyuz, that's all there is. You're inside a can. It ain't pretty like
the shuttle.

George Evans
Craig Fink - 21 Sep 2006 12:49 GMT
>> Why don't the shuttle launch videos ever show much video of inside the
>> cabin?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> With Soyuz, that's all there is. You're inside a can. It ain't pretty like
> the shuttle.

Yeah, and it looks like the Soyuz is stuffed full of cargo too. Big bags
of stuff all around the Cosmonauts.

Signature

Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ WeBeGood@GMail.Com

David Stribling - 22 Sep 2006 00:56 GMT
> Yeah, and it looks like the Soyuz is stuffed full of cargo too. Big bags
> of stuff all around the Cosmonauts.

Looked a whole lot like when we used to pack up the Caravan w/ the 4 kids to
go to grandma's ;^)
George Evans - 23 Sep 2006 01:04 GMT
>> Yeah, and it looks like the Soyuz is stuffed full of cargo too. Big bags
>> of stuff all around the Cosmonauts.
>
> Looked a whole lot like when we used to pack up the Caravan w/ the 4 kids to
> go to grandma's ;^)

That's why the Russians gave up on Buran, it didn't feel right, too roomy.

George Evans
David Stribling - 22 Sep 2006 00:57 GMT
> Yeah, and it looks like the Soyuz is stuffed full of cargo too. Big bags
> of stuff all around the Cosmonauts.

Looked a whole lot like when we used to pack up the Caravan w/ the 4 kids to
go to grandma's ;^)
Jochem Huhmann - 21 Sep 2006 14:14 GMT
>> Why don't the shuttle launch videos ever show much video of inside the
>> cabin?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> With Soyuz, that's all there is. You're inside a can. It ain't pretty like
> the shuttle.

No, the "cabin" (reentry module) is actually the smaller of the two
modules. What you don't see is the (larger) orbital module.

Still, much smaller than the Shuttle.

       Jochem

Signature

"A designer knows he has arrived at perfection not when there is no
longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away."
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery

Doctor Bombay - 23 Sep 2006 16:34 GMT
> Why don't the shuttle launch videos ever show much video of inside the
> cabin?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Yes, I want the eye candy!

Could you please provide me with the link to this video?
I would like to see it.
Thank you very much
DB
snidely - 28 Sep 2006 01:15 GMT
> Why don't the shuttle launch videos ever show much video of inside the
> cabin?
>
> The Soyuz launch video puts you inside the cabin from the moment the rocket
> lights all the way until they are well in orbit!  And the quality of the
> video is pretty good.

Oh yeah, baby, watch them flip those check list pages!

/dps
(Sorry, I think it's an interesting video, but hardly eye-candy -- you
don't see much besides the gloves waving and the pages fluttering.)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.