Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / August 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Weather

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Brian Gaff - 28 Aug 2006 20:39 GMT
I'm beginning to wonder how anything gets launched in Florida, considering
the unpredictability of the weather.

Can anyone explain the reason why they cannot have both a Soyuz and a
Shuttle at the station at the same time? Is it purely that there would be
too much going on at once, or is there a technical reason. Also, if the crew
rotation occurs, do the new crew  know what  help the 115 crew would expect
from them for the mission?

Would it not, maybe, be better to shelve the crew rotation for a month or
so, in the hope that the shuttle can get the job done before the rotation?

Brian

Signature

Brian Gaff - briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff'
in the display name may be lost.

Danny Dot - 30 Aug 2006 21:25 GMT
Signature

Danny Dot
Look at my site and see how NASA treats a creative mind!!!
The summary is "Not Very Well" :-)
www.mobbinggonemad.org

> I'm beginning to wonder how anything gets launched in Florida, considering
> the unpredictability of the weather.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Brian

Weather for a winged vehicle with a Return To Launch Site (RTLS) abort is a
problem.  The shuttle needs (I think) 8,000 ceiling and 5 miles of
visibility to launch to protect for the event it needs to come back to
Kennedy for a early failure of one of its engines.  It also needs the same
weather at one of its Trans Atlantic Abort sites to be the same.

It also has the problem of fragile, exposed thermal protection for hail and
rain while on the pad.  This is a reason to go back to capsules (which NASA
is with Orion).  The weather requirements to do an abort are MUCH more
generous for a capsule and the capsule on the top has no fragile thermal
protection exposed to the weather.  I worked with the Russians in 1993 to
use the Soyuz as an escape vehicle from (at that time) a US/Europe/Japanese
station.  They bragged many times the Soyuz has never missed a launch for
weather.  They have no requirement for ceiling and visibility for launch.
They have NEVER aborted a launch for weather.  They have literally launched
in the middle of a blizzard at the launch site.  A capsule can abort in the
middle of very bad weather.  I winged vehicle that needs to land on a runway
can not.

Danny Dot
www.mobbinggonemad.org
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.