> Delurk time for me for the first time since the mad scientists sub
> thread last year.....
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> have some questions that perhaps the regulars here may be able to
> answer.
that was the novel where NIven finally jumped the shark for me, until then I
was still valiantly hanging on. Have only been a sporadic Niven reader ever
since.
Two major peeves with Larry: 1) his stories all have pretty much teh same
plot (beings from an advanced civilization become stranded in barbarism and
have to use their wits to get back to civilization); and 2) he's spent the
last ~20 mainly recycling the same existing stories over and over again in
slightly different configurations (how may anthologies has he come out
with?).
Pity, he was my alltime favorite sf author through the '70s.

Signature
Terrell Miller
millerto@bellsouth.net
Many scientists recall President Dwight Eisenhower's warnings about the
danger of the rising postwar military-industrial complex, notes Mr. Happer,
now a Princeton physicist. In the same speech, however, Eisenhower also
warned: "We must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public
policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these
and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic
system...."
-The Week
Bob Haller - 20 May 2006 23:04 GMT
foam loss and management screw ups would be the main problems:(
Bash - 28 May 2006 18:55 GMT
Well it's not as if they were expected to re-enter right..... :-p
> My hypothetical questions are:-
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> they could have been hauled into orbit with the orion craft. I would
> suspect the tank would collapse under two loads even at 3 g.
If mass is not an issue, I guess you could prop a shuttle&ET. Even use
some shock absorbers to reduce shocks.