 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI SpaceKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Space Forum / Shuttle / April 2006you gotta wonder (is Star Wars for aliens)
Is Star Wars space defense system for fighting aliens from outter space - and I am NOT JOKING here. There is no international conflict with the USSR or any other country with nuclear or hydrogen weaponry, yet the U.S. Government is continuing with Star Wars defense system[s]. I think truly, I LITERALLY BELIEVE THIS - this is for extraterrestrials. And the weaponry we advanced to, would destroy anything in physical form, even ultra advanced technology extraterrestrials would use regarding electromagnetic fields for propulsion. I say Star Wars is being developed under a guise of international conflict to hide the fact that it's really being developed to fight extraterrestrials, as many of the UFO footage, the UFOs are always surveilling the space shuttles. The footage and much of it, has a pattern, a pattern that NASA didnt' realize they were soliciting. The pattern is that the UFOs are always hanging out by space shuttles - and Scott Carpenter said "At no time while the space astronauts were in space, were they alone, they were constantly under surveillance by the UFO's" - and that pattern and behavior is again, very notable in the footage we have available. I say the government[s] are arming up for UFO wars, under the guise of nuclear wars with each other. > Is Star Wars space defense system for fighting aliens from > outter space - and I am NOT JOKING here. Joking requires a minimal degree of mental activity that's beyond anything you've evinced so far. > There is no international conflict with the USSR or any other > country with >nuclear or hydrogen weaponry, <snicker> That was stupid, bimbo. >yet the U.S. > Government is continuing with Star Wars defense system[s]. > > I think truly, I LITERALLY BELIEVE THIS - this is for > extraterrestrials. Of course you "literally" believe that. Try to imagine how insignificant that fact is. > And the weaponry we advanced to, would destroy anything in > physical form, even ultra advanced technology > extraterrestrials would use regarding electromagnetic fields > for propulsion. "Electromagnetic fields for propulsion"! Wooohoooo! > I say Star Wars is being developed under a guise of > international conflict to hide the fact that it's really being > developed to fight extraterrestrials, as many of the UFO > footage, the UFOs are always surveilling the space shuttles. Of course you say that. You couldn't possibly be aware of the fact that weapons and tools to be used in current conflicts would have to have been developed earlier, and of course you couldn't possibly get your paltry mind around the concept of contingency. > The footage and much of it, has a pattern, a pattern that NASA > didnt' realize they were soliciting. If they weren't aware of soliciting something, they weren't soliciting something. You forget that a mind like yours has at best a two-syllable maximum. >The pattern is that the > UFOs are always hanging out by space shuttles - Well, okay, dunce, so why don't we just get some volunteers to stroll on up to those motherf..kers and ask them what the hell they're doing in the assembly buildings? >and Scott > Carpenter said "At no time while the space astronauts were in [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I say the government[s] are arming up for UFO wars, under the > guise of nuclear wars with each other. Say some more sh.t. You cretins' job is to entertain us normal people, you know. Say "Groom Lake" soon. > > Is Star Wars space defense system for fighting aliens from > > outter space - and I am NOT JOKING here. [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] > Say some more sh.t. You cretins' job is to entertain us normal > people, you know. Say "Groom Lake" soon. Hey, he LITERALLY BELIEVES IT, and goddammit, that's enough proof for me, and should be for you, too, you f.cking barbarian. Get with teh program, John. We only have a little over six years to get our species' act together, and then it's DOOOM! DOOOOOOMMMMM!!!! P.S. - GROOM LAKE, you f.cking infidel! -- V.G. "i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?" - AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside. Change pobox dot alaska to gci. Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" <vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote: >> > Is Star Wars space defense system for fighting aliens from >> > outter space - and I am NOT JOKING here. [quoted text clipped - 68 lines] > over six years to get our species' act together, and then it's > DOOOM! DOOOOOOMMMMM!!!! I have a high spot picked out. I won't have to kill my dog when the day comes. I don't have a dog. I was going up there every month and caching lots of grits and ammo until the day I found that the mind control satellites were tracking everyone who does that sort of thing. > P.S. - GROOM LAKE, you f.cking infidel! Yeah! Let's all get together and storm the gates of Area 51 six years from now. We can snatch Alexa's saucer and get the hell out of here! > -- > V.G. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. I believe that Earth has its own real conflicts. But, nonetheless, advanced countries are, I believe, striving to protect themselves against the possibility of Alien attack. The problem with Aliens isn't that they are different from us. They are too much the same. I also believe that alien life exists on Mars. JPL photos of Mars taken by Spirit Rover show, when enlarged and shadows are erased by contrast/brightness, animals, aliens, and humanoids. See for yourself. See: http://stardot.blogspot.com/ tomcat > I believe that Earth has its own real conflicts. But, > nonetheless, advanced countries are, I believe, striving to > protect themselves against the possibility of Alien attack. > The problem with Aliens isn't that they are different from us. > They are too much the same. Since they live only in your head, they can't be very much like us normal humans. > I also believe that alien life exists on Mars. Where do you believe those aliens came from? Why, in your laughable opinion, did they stop at Mars? >JPL photos of > Mars taken by Spirit Rover show, when enlarged and shadows are > erased by contrast/brightness, animals, aliens, and humanoids. They're only apparent to a mind unencumbered by rationality. > See for yourself. > > See: http://stardot.blogspot.com/ > > tomcat > > I believe that Earth has its own real conflicts. But, > > nonetheless, advanced countries are, I believe, striving to [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > > > See: http://stardot.blogspot.com/ John, you need to access JPL's Spirit Rover website ( http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit.html ) and save the pictures to your own photo software, enlarge them to about 300%, erase shadows using brightness/contrast, and really study them. Do it yourself and maybe, just maybe -- if you're not debunking -- you will believe what you see. The pictures on ( http://stardot.blogspot.com/ ) have the locations given for the JPL website. Usually there are a number of pictures but only 3 or 4 actual different scenes. So, do it yourself, and observe the . . . Martians! tomcat >> > I believe that Earth has its own real conflicts. But, >> > nonetheless, advanced countries are, I believe, striving to [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > > tomcat I will be ecstatic if we ever find evidence of life outside our own planet, but that kind of sh.t is lame as hell. Take some pictures and f.ck with them until you can distort them into what you want to see...dumb. That's like throwing sh.t against a wall, painting targets around the brown spots and calling yourself "Deadeye." > I will be ecstatic if we ever find evidence of life outside our > own planet, but that kind of sh.t is lame as hell. Take some > pictures and f.ck with them until you can distort them into what > you want to see...dumb. That's like throwing sh.t against a > wall, painting targets around the brown spots and calling > yourself "Deadeye." No you would not be ecstatic. Instead you would bury your head in the sand. How do I know this? Because that is what you just did. Really! Those pictures I present are authentic, not distorted, superimposed, or altered, in any way whatsoever. How can you live with yourself? What do you see in the mirror? tomcat >> I will be ecstatic if we ever find evidence of life outside >> our own planet, but that kind of sh.t is lame as hell. Take [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > head in the sand. How do I know this? Because that is what > you just did. Really! ROTMFFLMMFAO! You are a dimwit. How do I know this? DUH...you just demonstrated it. > Those pictures I present are authentic, not distorted, > superimposed, or altered, in any way whatsoever. If I thought they were distorted, I would have said so instead of alluding to the obvious fact that if they showed any life forms, you wouldn't need to go through the machinations you've so meticulously described. > How can you live with yourself? That's pretty fuckin' easy to do. Every day, I just wake up, and there I am. You should try "waking up." >What do you see in the > mirror? One of your six billion betters...if you really believe the sh.t you're spewing; maybe only three billion if you don't. This, of course, is not counting any good dogs. > ROTMFFLMMFAO! You are a dimwit. How do I know this? DUH...you > just demonstrated it. That's pretty fuckin' easy to do. Every day, I just wake up, and > there I am. This, of course, is not counting any good dogs. I am not certain that I understand you. You look at the Mars pictures but they appear to you as a confused glob of color and shapes? From what I understand, you have the same problem with Venus. Just more random colors and shapes? On one of your better days, try to look at the pictures. I understand that you are having difficulty, but do your best. Brad and I understand. We wish you our best. tomcat > I am not certain that I understand you. I'll help you decide...It's 100% certain that you don't. Why would you start understanding things now instead of maintaining your lifetime tradition? John, develop an interest in history or science. In 'sci.space.shuttle' you are supposed to have an interest in Space Technology, i.e., NASA's Space Shuttle. Do you? tomcat >John, develop an interest in history or science. In >'sci.space.shuttle' you are supposed to have an interest in Space >Technology, i.e., NASA's Space Shuttle. Do you? Why are you unable to quote and attribute properly?  SignatureOfficial Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Official Agent of Deception Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 "An applied ripple action implies time and momentum reciprocal dependent directed surface tension not instantaneous field wide reaction." -- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief > >John, develop an interest in history or science. In > >'sci.space.shuttle' you are supposed to have an interest in Space > >Technology, i.e., NASA's Space Shuttle. Do you? > > Why are you unable to quote and attribute properly? Well, it *is* very complicated, you know? -- V.G. "i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?" - AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside. Change pobox dot alaska to gci. Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. > John, develop an interest in history or science. In > 'sci.space.shuttle' you are supposed to have an interest in > Space Technology, i.e., NASA's Space Shuttle. Do you? Just out of curiosity...how do you get google to not quote the articles you so ineptly try to reply to? Maybe it's just that you don't have the smarts to understand a little check box or something...? By the way, the implication that you can understand the legitimate topics in a discussion of space technology is pretty goldarned f.cking hilarious. This is exemplified by the fact that you think a legitimate use of graphics technology is to f.ck around with pictures of rocks until you get the illusion to match your delusion. >> John, develop an interest in history or science. In >> 'sci.space.shuttle' you are supposed to have an interest in [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >around with pictures of rocks until you get the illusion to match >your delusion. "Look, look! I found an Alien in the middle of a lifeless desert! He's a very _special_ alien - he doen't have to eat, or drink! He's a one-being ecosystem!" Heh. ESL! SignatureBookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Monthly Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 "I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely "****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot." "ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/afa-b/ http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/afa-b/index.html WWFSMD? > "Look, look! I found an Alien in the middle of a lifeless desert! > He's a very _special_ alien - he doen't have to eat, or drink! > He's a one-being ecosystem!" What you are doing is debunking. I don't think much of it. It is unproductive except to exclude other posters, which is not the goal of Google Groups. I would respond to your remark/depreciation/attack except that I know you aren't serious. It is simply another 'sword thrust'. You cannot deal with ideas. You lack basic knowledge of Space or Space Systems. tomcat >> "Look, look! I found an Alien in the middle of a lifeless >> desert! He's a very _special_ alien - he doen't have to eat, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > It is unproductive except to exclude other posters, which is > not the goal of Google Groups. Damn, I'm glad I don't use Google Groups! Intangible motherf..kers with goals are spooky! > I would respond to your remark/depreciation/attack except that > I know you aren't serious. It is simply another 'sword > thrust'. You cannot deal with ideas. You lack basic > knowledge of Space or Space Systems. > > tomcat >> "Look, look! I found an Alien in the middle of a lifeless desert! >> He's a very _special_ alien - he doen't have to eat, or drink! >> He's a one-being ecosystem!" > >What you are doing is debunking. I don't think much of it. Do you even know what the word means? debunk One entry found for debunk. Main Entry: de·bunk Pronunciation: (")dE-'b&[ng]k Function: transitive verb : to expose the sham or falseness of <debunk a legend> - de·bunk·er noun >It is >unproductive except to exclude other posters, Please explain how you or Guth have "excluded". >which is not the goal of >Google Groups. Umm, free clue, this is usenet. >I would respond to your remark/depreciation/attack except that I know >you aren't serious. Are you psychic? >It is simply another 'sword thrust'. Please define this term. >You cannot >deal with ideas. Please provide an example of this assertion. >You lack basic knowledge of Space or Space Systems. How do you what Bookman does or does not know? >tomcat SignatureOfficial Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Official Agent of Deception Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 "An applied ripple action implies time and momentum reciprocal dependent directed surface tension not instantaneous field wide reaction." -- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief >> "Look, look! I found an Alien in the middle of a lifeless desert! >> He's a very _special_ alien - he doen't have to eat, or drink! >> He's a one-being ecosystem!" > >What you are doing is debunking. Incorrect. What I am doing is mocking you. It points up nicely your inability to defend your pet "theory". >I don't think much <period> Now, that's an accurate sentence. You needn't thank me. >of it. >It is >unproductive except to exclude other posters, which is not the goal of >Google Groups. This ain't "Google Groups", cupcake. >I would respond to your remark/depreciation/attack except that I know >you aren't serious. Another incorrect assumption. I'm not taking _you_ seriously. That's because you and your widdle "theory" do not merit being taken seriously. SUX2BU. >It is simply another 'sword thrust'. And it skewered yer liver, Arrgh! >You cannot >deal with ideas. You lack basic knowledge of Space or Space Systems. Awww, your pussy hurts! Get back to us[tinu] when the swelling goes down. Either that, or try to establish why you are declaring to "know" these things. Just makin' fun of your ko0ky idea is hardly proof, after all. Do you k'lame to be "psychic", or soomething? ESL! SignatureBookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Monthly Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 "I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely "****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot." "ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of Hitler. - Brad Guth waxes "scientific" WWFSMD? > >> "Look, look! I found an Alien in the middle of a lifeless desert! > >> He's a very _special_ alien - he doen't have to eat, or drink! [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of > Hitler. What is all this? Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Monthly Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 "I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely "****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot." "ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of Hitler. Should we take Bookman seriously? tomcat >> >> "Look, look! I found an Alien in the middle of a lifeless >> >> desert! He's a very _special_ alien - he doen't have to [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > > What is all this? Evidence. Collecting all this stuff into one article from various sources is a warning that you might be living with a serious case of obsessive-compulsive disorder. > Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B > Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Should we take Bookman seriously? Those things seem to indicate that he's going to do, without apology, exactly whatever he says he will, so yes. >> >> "Look, look! I found an Alien in the middle of a lifeless desert! >> >> He's a very _special_ alien - he doen't have to eat, or drink! [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >> Incorrect. What I am doing is mocking you. It points up nicely your >> inability to defend your pet "theory". Note: No response. >> >I don't think much >> <period> >> >> Now, that's an accurate sentence. You needn't thank me. Note: No response. >> >of it. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> This ain't "Google Groups", cupcake. Note: No response. >> >I would respond to your remark/depreciation/attack except that I know >> >you aren't serious. >> >> Another incorrect assumption. I'm not taking _you_ seriously. That's >> because you and your widdle "theory" do not merit being taken >> seriously. SUX2BU. Note: No response. >> >It is simply another 'sword thrust'. >> >> And it skewered yer liver, Arrgh! Note: No response. >> >You cannot >> >deal with ideas. You lack basic knowledge of Space or Space Systems. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> "know" these things. Just makin' fun of your ko0ky idea is hardly >> proof, after all. Do you k'lame to be "psychic", or soomething? Note: No response. >> ESL! >> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >What is all this? It's a Usenet post, one in which you managed to humiliate yourself rather thoroughly. HTH >Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B >Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of >Hitler. .Sig envy is a sad thing. >Should we take Bookman seriously? Who is this "we" you are referring to? Keeping a gerbil realy "close" to you? ESL! SignatureBookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 "I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely "****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot." "ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of Hitler. - Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead. WWFSMD? > What you are doing is debunking. I don't think much of it. There's a big surprise. -- V.G. "i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?" - AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside. Change pobox dot alaska to gci. Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. > >> John, develop an interest in history or science. In > >> 'sci.space.shuttle' you are supposed to have an interest in [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > ESL! He only LOOKS like a big rock! It's really just his AMAZING CAMOUFLAGE!! They're shape-shifter, you know? Very clever, very dangerous. -- V.G. "i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?" - AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside. Change pobox dot alaska to gci. Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" <vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> wrote: >> >> John, develop an interest in history or science. In >> >> 'sci.space.shuttle' you are supposed to have an interest [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > CAMOUFLAGE!! They're shape-shifter, you know? Very clever, > very dangerous. It's fun to walk close to one while pretending to look away. They try to pounce on you, forgetting that they're in their rock state. If you catch one and do that in the early evening after a sunny day, they can get so infuriated that they start radiating in the infrared. It's fun to piss on them when they do that. It freezes them in rock mode long enough for you to get away. > "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" <vgorilla@pobox.alaska.net> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > in the infrared. It's fun to piss on them when they do that. It > freezes them in rock mode long enough for you to get away. Thanks, John. THat's some handy information I was not aware of. -- V.G. "i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?" - AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside. Change pobox dot alaska to gci. Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. > John, develop an interest in history or science. In > 'sci.space.shuttle' you are supposed to have an interest in Space > Technology, i.e., NASA's Space Shuttle. Do you? > > tomcat You may have an interest, but your understanding can be compared to a dog watching television. > I believe that Earth has its own real conflicts. But, nonetheless, > advanced countries are, I believe, striving to protect themselves [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > tomcat Huh? I'm glad you're on my side Tomcat, but I have no idea what the sequence of manuevers is to see these entitys. Can you number from 1 to "whatever" exactly the steps in changing your contrast & brightness to see this? Thanks. > > I believe that Earth has its own real conflicts. But, nonetheless, > > advanced countries are, I believe, striving to protect themselves [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Thanks. Step 1: Right click the picture when it is at the largest available size. Step 2: Select "Save As" and place in either Documents or Briefcase. Step 3: Repeat the above for as many pictures as you wish to check. Step 4: Return to your Desktop. Step 5: Open your Photo Software. Step 6: Load one of your saved pictures using your "Open" button on the software. Step 7: Enlarge the picture using Zoom controls. Step 8: Look for either black shadow areas or interesting rocks. 'Interesting' means either very big or lots of them or white in color. Step 9: If the picture is just dim, use Brightness to brighten it up for better detail. If too bright then dim it. Step 10: If the picture has black shadows, especially if they are large, use Contrast to turn the picture medium gray, erasing shadows, then brighten to taste. Step 11: If the picture is worth keeping then Resize the picture to bring out more detail and interlace the enlargement for smoothness. Step 12: Save the picture to either Documents or Briefcase for future reference. tomcat >> > I believe that Earth has its own real conflicts. But, nonetheless, >> > advanced countries are, I believe, striving to protect themselves [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] >Step 12: Save the picture to either Documents or Briefcase for future >reference. And after all that they still look just like rocks, amazing. SignatureOfficial Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Official Agent of Deception Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 "Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum." -- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief > > > I believe that Earth has its own real conflicts. But, nonetheless, > > > advanced countries are, I believe, striving to protect themselves [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > Step 12: Save the picture to either Documents or Briefcase for future > reference. Thanks, I'll let you know after I've done this. It might be a week or two, I don't have my own PC and have to use others. Good instructions BTW. > I don't have my own PC and have to use others. Boulder Colorado 65.114.219.190 = [ ] OrgName: Qwest Communications Corporation OrgID: QCC-18 Address: 1801 California Street City: Denver StateProv: CO PostalCode: 80202 Country: US NetRange: 65.112.0.0 - 65.127.255.255 CIDR: 65.112.0.0/12 NetName: QWEST-INET-10 NetHandle: NET-65-112-0-0-1 Parent: NET-65-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: DCA-ANS-01.INET.QWEST.NET NameServer: SVL-ANS-01.INET.QWEST.NET Comment: ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE Comment: NOTE: For abuse issues please email abuse@qwest.net. RegDate: 2001-01-04 Updated: 2005-11-15 OrgAbuseHandle: QIA2-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Qwest Abuse OrgAbusePhone: 1-877-886-6515 OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@qwest.net OrgNOCHandle: QIN-ARIN OrgNOCName: Qwest IP NOC OrgNOCPhone: 1-877-886-6515 OrgNOCEmail: support@qwestip.net OrgTechHandle: QIA-ARIN OrgTechName: Qwest IP Admin OrgTechPhone: 1-877-886-6515 OrgTechEmail: ipadmin@qwest.com OrgName: Arapahoe County OrgID: ARAPAH Address: 5334 S. Prince St. City: Littleton StateProv: MN PostalCode: 80166 Country: US NetRange: 65.114.219.160 - 65.114.219.191 CIDR: 65.114.219.160/27 NetName: Q0912-65-114-219-160 NetHandle: NET-65-114-219-160-1 Parent: NET-65-112-0-0-1 NetType: Reassigned Comment: RegDate: 2001-09-12 Updated: 2001-09-12 RTechHandle: KK687-ARIN RTechName: Kemp Kevin RTechPhone: 1-303-795-4551 RTechEmail: kkemp@co.arapahoe.co.us >> > > I believe that Earth has its own real conflicts. But, nonetheless, >> > > advanced countries are, I believe, striving to protect themselves [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] >two, I don't have my own PC and have to use others. Good instructions >BTW. You seem to have rocks for brains. SignatureOfficial Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Official Agent of Deception Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 "Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum." -- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief > Yeah! Let's all get together and storm the gates of Area 51 six > years from now. We can snatch Alexa's saucer and get the hell out > of here! FYI: I'd rather not ever see the words "snatch" and "Alexa" in the same sentence ever again, please. I think I'm going to have nightmares. -- V.G. "i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?" - AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside. Change pobox dot alaska to gci. Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. 1 Apr 2006 16:20:46 GMT, John Griffin <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote: >> Is Star Wars space defense system for fighting aliens from >> outter space - and I am NOT JOKING here. [quoted text clipped - 60 lines] >Say some more sh.t. You cretins' job is to entertain us normal >people, you know. Say "Groom Lake" soon. "Black helicopters!" You left out black helicoptersa as an actual saucerhead [phrase that must be incuded in much of their drivel. How could you? Widdershins Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity. > 1 Apr 2006 16:20:46 GMT, John Griffin > <thathillbilly@yahooie.com> [quoted text clipped - 70 lines] > actual saucerhead [phrase that must be incuded in much of > their drivel. How could you? Damn...I have no idea how I could have forgotten that. I hear black helicopters at night sometimes. Well, anyway, they must be black. I can't see them. I've heard that they're not dangerous until they kill the lights and silence the rotors...is that the truth or did the crazies make it up? > Widdershins > > Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity. Heh heh heh....speakin' of saucerheads. >Is Star Wars space defense system for fighting aliens from outter space >- and I am NOT JOKING here. [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >I say the government[s] are arming up for UFO wars, under the guise of >nuclear wars with each other. Alexa Cameron is the expert on this subject. SignatureOfficial Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Official Agent of Deception Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 "Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum." -- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief > >Is Star Wars space defense system for fighting aliens from outter space > >- and I am NOT JOKING here. [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > > Alexa Cameron is the expert on this subject. How generous of you. = >> >Is Star Wars space defense system for fighting aliens from outter space >> >- and I am NOT JOKING here. [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > >= <bows> SignatureOfficial Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Official Agent of Deception Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 "An applied ripple action implies time and momentum reciprocal dependent directed surface tension not instantaneous field wide reaction." -- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief > Is Star Wars space defense system for fighting aliens from outter space > - and I am NOT JOKING here. Dude, "Stargate" is not a documentary. > Is Star Wars space defense system for fighting aliens from outter space > - and I am NOT JOKING here. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I think truly, I LITERALLY BELIEVE THIS - this is for > extraterrestrials. Space defenses are probably being researched, designed, and built with either an Earthly war or an Extraterrestial war in mind. There is considerable evidence of extraterrestial activity and well as the possibility of attack my a nuclear power right here on Earth. Check out STS-75 photos on a good Search Engine. At the end of the severed tether is a 'UFO' that is estimated to be about 2 miles in diameter. With Extraterrestial ships that big we need to step up our Space Defenses. I strongly recommend adding 50 billion dollars a year to USAF's budget until it reaches about 400 billion dollars a year. tomcat > And the weaponry we advanced to, would destroy anything in physical > form, even ultra advanced technology extraterrestrials would use [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > I say the government[s] are arming up for UFO wars, under the guise of > nuclear wars with each other. >> Is Star Wars space defense system for fighting aliens from outter space >> - and I am NOT JOKING here. [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >Defenses. I strongly recommend adding 50 billion dollars a year to >USAF's budget until it reaches about 400 billion dollars a year. What a load of nonsense. >tomcat >> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >> I say the government[s] are arming up for UFO wars, under the guise of >> nuclear wars with each other. SignatureOfficial Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy Official Agent of Deception Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005 "An applied ripple action implies time and momentum reciprocal dependent directed surface tension not instantaneous field wide reaction." -- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief > >Space defenses are probably being researched, designed, and built with > >either an Earthly war or an Extraterrestial war in mind. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Defenses. I strongly recommend adding 50 billion dollars a year to > >USAF's budget until it reaches about 400 billion dollars a year. > Art Deco wrote: > What a load of nonsense. Art, I don't know why I try to educate you. Clearly you have a 'closed mind'. But I will try anyway. Here is a website explaining the remarks. It shows the NASA pictures of the STS-75 tether experiment. http://www.freewebs.com/nurmufo/tether.html If this doesn't convince you that my remarks are not "a load of nonsense" then nothing will. Because of your 'closed mind' condition you will probably not accept the pictures placed in front of you by NASA. tomcat >> >Space defenses are probably being researched, designed, and built with >> >either an Earthly war or an Extraterrestial war in mind. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > >Art, I don't know why I try to educate you. You have yet to poast anything containing educational content. >Clearly you have a 'closed >mind'. What makes you believe this, "psychic powers"? >But I will try anyway. Let us[tinu] know when you actually post something educational, as opposed to campaigning for belief in your goofy "theories". >Here is a website explaining the remarks. It shows the NASA pictures >of the STS-75 tether experiment. > >http://www.freewebs.com/nurmufo/tether.html Really? If that is so, why not just post a link to the NASA photos? >If this doesn't convince you that my remarks are not "a load of >nonsense" then nothing will. Because of your 'closed mind' condition >you will probably not accept the pictures placed in front of you by >NASA. Wishful thinking on your part, ko0kboi. I don't doubt you commonly say that people who fail to agree with you are "closed minded", since you lack the imagination to use more colorful ad hominems, let alone the intelligence to accurately perceive reality. ESL! SignatureBookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 "I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely "****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot." "ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of Hitler. - Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead. WWFSMD? >>>Space defenses are probably being researched, designed, and built with >>>either an Earthly war or an Extraterrestial war in mind. [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > tomcat Hold up, tc. You have one photo of "something", no other support data, and yet this one photo "proves" et's are among us? Now, does the word "nonsense" make more sense? Richard only replying to s.s.station and s.s.shuttle - just out of curiosity... > >>>Space defenses are probably being researched, designed, and built with > >>>either an Earthly war or an Extraterrestial war in mind. [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > Now, does the word "nonsense" make more sense? Closed minds are really something. A live, kicking and screaming, greenie could be tied down in front of you and you would say it is a 'trick'. tomcat tomcat <jlavine@bellsouth.net>, the raffish furrier, vented: > Closed minds are really something. A live, kicking and screaming, > greenie could be tied down in front of you and you would say it is a > 'trick'. Well, I suppose that just goes to show that I am not in the set of those with closed minds. If 'a live, kicking and screaming, greenie could be tied down in front of' me, I'd kick the c.nt. Signaturealt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker: September 2005 and April 2006 ObHint: Just because you argue with a notorious fuckwit netk0oK, it does not necessarily follow that you are not also a fuckwit netk0oK. > tomcat <jlavine@bellsouth.net>, the raffish furrier, vented: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > with closed minds. If 'a live, kicking and screaming, greenie could be tied > down in front of' me, I'd kick the c.nt. Apparently, you have an 'open' mind. You have a natural instinct to do what is right in these perilous times. It is people like yourself that will venture forth into Outer Space, fight the Aliens, and win territory and mining rights for Earth's human race. The 'closed mind' types will commit suicide at some future date out of shock and dismay of finding out that Aliens exist in Outer Space. It is more than they can imagine in their wildest dreams. The brute fact of Alien existence will depress them more than you or I could possibly imagine, that is why they are resisting so hard on the Usenet. It is just too much for them. Perhaps they can be put in special rooms where no TV or radio is allowed and lied to about current events so that they will feel at peace in their Unique Earth beliefs. But, frankly, I can't think of a good reason for saving them. tomcat >>tomcat <jlavine@bellsouth.net>, the raffish furrier, vented: >> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > tomcat I keep an open mind, just not so open that my brains fall out... Richard tomcat <jlavine@bellsouth.net>, the swanky porcilinist, banged out: >> tomcat <jlavine@bellsouth.net>, the raffish furrier, vented: >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Apparently, you have an 'open' mind. You have a natural instinct to > do what is right in these perilous times. I would suggest that kicking tied-up greenies would come naturally to all reasonable people. Signaturealt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker: September 2005 and April 2006 ObHint: Just because you argue with a notorious fuckwit netk0oK, it does not necessarily follow that you are not also a fuckwit netk0oK. > tomcat <jlavine@bellsouth.net>, the swanky porcilinist, banged out: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > I would suggest that kicking tied-up greenies would come naturally to all > reasonable people. The "greenies" are competing with us. It is possible that there are different groups of "greenies" but they, at this point, are all presumed to be dangerous to humankind. Sooner or later or, possibly, already will or are testing our defenses. We must not be weak. This is why I say that USAF needs 50 billion dollars a year 'additional' funding each year until their budget reaches roughly 400 billion dollars a year. This is an affordable sum for the United States. We are, perhaps, the only country on Earth capable of protecting Earth. Don't think that I 'just' happen to love the USAF. My recommendation is based on a real need that America has. The need to protect the people of the United States from 'Alien Intervention' and even 'Alien Attack'. tomcat tomcat <jlavine@bellsouth.net>, the coffin maker, exhausted: >> tomcat <jlavine@bellsouth.net>, the swanky porcilinist, banged out: >> [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > people of the United States from 'Alien Intervention' and even 'Alien > Attack'. I couldn't give a flying f.ck at a rolling doughnut for America. Signaturealt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker: September 2005 and April 2006 ObHint: Just because you argue with a notorious fuckwit netk0oK, it does not necessarily follow that you are not also a fuckwit netk0oK. > tomcat <jlavine@bellsouth.net>, the coffin maker, exhausted: > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > people of the United States from 'Alien Intervention' and even 'Alien > > Attack'. > I couldn't give a flying f.ck at a rolling doughnut for America. What country do you live in? We are all born somewhere. That is our place, for better or worse. tomcat tomcat <jlavine@bellsouth.net>, the game show host, noted: >> tomcat <jlavine@bellsouth.net>, the coffin maker, exhausted: >> [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > What country do you live in? What the f.ck is it to you? > We are all born somewhere. No sh.t, Shylock? > That is our place, for better or worse. You're an idiot. > tomcat Signaturealt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker: September 2005 and April 2006 ObHint: Just because you argue with a notorious fuckwit netk0oK, it does not necessarily follow that you are not also a fuckwit netk0oK. > > >Space defenses are probably being researched, designed, and built with > > >either an Earthly war or an Extraterrestial war in mind. [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > tomcat Clearly you do not know much about the tether experiment. Care to tell us what the tension would be for a 100 meter tether in a 500 km orbit? And, there is a difference between an open mind and a hole in the head, and don't leave your mind so open your brains fall out. Oppsss...Too late, you better go chase after them, brains are hard to come by. > There is considerable evidence of extraterrestial activity There is even more evidence of saucerhead gullibility. -- V.G. "i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?" - AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside. Change pobox dot alaska to gci. Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. >> There is considerable evidence of extraterrestial activity > >There is even more evidence of saucerhead gullibility. There is still more evidence of psuedoscientific inanity. ESL! SignatureBookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 "I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely "****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot." "ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes Bookman is yet another Usenet fignuten, meaning naysayer and/or rusemaster of their incest cloned Third Reich. In other words, you're communicating with an intellectual if not a biological clone of Hitler. - Brad Guth tries to wax "scientific", but invokes Godwin, instead. WWFSMD? |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.