"Uncle Jean" told the uncle and all the others:
» But there must be no big difference, I think, in speed and
» altitude at MECO, whatever the orbit they want to reach.
» Right ?
OK, so a graph indicating the speend at every moment from
lift-off to MECO... :o)
UJ
> "ghost@gmail.com" told the uncle and all the others:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> altitude at MECO, whatever the orbit they want to reach.
> Right ?
Are you talking about those two as "predicted" values? If so, can you
specify a standard payload and nominal SRB thrust?
With regard to your initial query about speed all the up, I took it
that you were looking for just one "as flown" graph. For that, I think
you might need a non-existent envelope of all missions.
> » but in certain cases because NASA has something to hide.
>
> This is something I don't know so I can't comment.
Well, for one thing, some of the older missions were classified (e.g.,
as to payload, payload weight, type of orbital insertion, etc.).
Challenger's Ghost
Uncle Jean - 27 Aug 2005 22:51 GMT
"ghost@gmail.com" told the uncle and all the others:
» Are you talking about those two as "predicted" values? If so, can you
» specify a standard payload and nominal SRB thrust?
If I had a graph that describes only one particular flight,
it would be good for me.
(...)
» Well, for one thing, some of the older missions were classified (e.g.,
» as to payload, payload weight, type of orbital insertion, etc.).
I see.
» Challenger's Ghost
ghost@gmail.com - 27 Aug 2005 23:29 GMT
> "ghost@gmail.com" told the uncle and all the others:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> If I had a graph that describes only one particular flight,
> it would be good for me.
To tell you the truth, Uncle Jean, many years back I encountered the
same problem you're having now. FOIA requests went unanswered by NASA
back then, sometimes perhaps even when they were made as part of an
official investigation. (By the way, I know of at least one
altitude/velocity FOIA request which is pending as we write.)
I decided to improvise (radically) by interpolating. I constructed some
rudimentary graphs of my own. For whatever they're worth, I used the
NASA PAO predictions, as they were called-out on early missions. I had
most of those on videotape. (I still do, but they are all
pre-Challenger, of course).
I haven't kept up with post-Challenger missions much, except enough to
tell you that some things have changed. I'm sorry I couldn't be of
more help to you.
Challenger's Ghost
Uncle Jean - 28 Aug 2005 00:11 GMT
"ghost@gmail.com" told the uncle and all the others:
» (...)
» I haven't kept up with post-Challenger missions much, except enough to
» tell you that some things have changed. I'm sorry I couldn't be of
» more help to you.
»
» Challenger's Ghost
Anymay I thank you, CG.
UJ
Vincent D. DeSimone - 28 Aug 2005 18:59 GMT
> If I had a graph that describes only one particular flight,
> it would be good for me.
In that case, Spaceflight Now has not a graph, but a chart, listing the
velocities of STS-114 starting at launch. With that data, you could make a
graph easily. Check out:
http://spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts114/fdf/114trajectory.html
Uncle Jean - 28 Aug 2005 22:58 GMT
"Vincent D. DeSimone" told the uncle and all the others:
» In that case, Spaceflight Now has not a graph, but a chart, listing the
» velocities of STS-114 starting at launch. With that data, you could make a
» graph easily. Check out:
»
» http://spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts114/fdf/114trajectory.html
Very good chart and I thank you, Vincent.
UJ