Space Shuttle's Second Redesigned External Tank to Ship from Michoud
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Jacques van Oene - 09 Mar 2005 21:35 GMT Space Shuttle's Second Redesigned External Tank to Ship from Michoud
03.04.05
June Malone Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Ala. (Phone: 256.544.0034) News release: 05-027
NASA will ship its second redesigned Space Shuttle External Tank Saturday, March 5, from Michoud Assembly Facility, near New Orleans., marking the first step toward final launch preparations for the launch of STS-121, possibly this summer. The mission, on the Space Shuttle Atlantis, is the second test flight of the Space Shuttle following the Columbia accident.
The tank, designated ET-121, rolled out on its transporter March 4 at NASA's Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans and loaded onto a covered barge for shipment to Kennedy Space Center. The trip from the Mississippi River Gulf of Mexico Outlet to Florida's Banana River, which pours into the Atlantic Ocean, usually takes four to five days.
The first redesigned tank, ET-120, was shipped from New Orleans to Kennedy Space Center in December 2004. It will launch NASA's STS-114 Return to Flight mission planned for May. It incorporated several safety improvements, including an improved bipod fitting that connects the tank to the Orbit; a video camera mounted on the liquid oxygen feed line to photograph liftoff; reversed bolts on the flange of the tank's mid-section and a new process for spraying the thermal protection required there; redesign of the bellow, or "joints" for movement, along the liquid oxygen feed line, the 70-foot pipe that feeds liquid oxygen to the Main Engines; and a more defined spray procedure on the longeron, a structural support for the tank's aft, orbiter attachment struts.
In addition to the ET-120 modifications, NASA's second redesigned tank has been outfitted with temperature sensors and accelerometers, used to measure vibration, which will gather information about how it performs during flight.
Temperature sensors will be mounted on the tank's two forward "bipods." Each tank has two bipod fittings that connect the tank to the Orbiter at the Shuttle's two forward attachment struts. These sensors will monitor the temperature of the bipod web, the flat section of the bipod located between the fitting and the attachment plate.
There also will be seven accelerometers on the tank. Three will be located in the intertank, the Tank's midsection, near the bipods, to measure any vibration caused by changes in the aerodynamic load, or stress. The other four accelerometers will be located in the cable tray of liquid oxygen protuberance air load ramps and will be used to determine whether there is need for the ramps in future tank modifications.
"The instrumentation on ET-121 will confirm what our computer models tell us happens during launch and ascent," said Sandy Coleman, manager of the External Tank Project, an element of the Space Shuttle Propulsion Office at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala. "Though computer models are invaluable, the information gained from an actual launch will give us an even better picture."
During a launch, the External Tank delivers 535,000 gallons of liquid hydrogen and oxygen propellants to the three Main Engines, which power the Shuttle to orbit. The Tank is covered by a polyurethane-like foam that insulates the propellants, keeps ice from forming on the Tank's exterior and protects its aluminum skin from aerodynamic heat during ascent. The Tank -- the largest element of the Shuttle system -- measures 27.6 feet wide and 154 feet tall and is the only Shuttle component that cannot be reused. The other elements include the Orbiter, the twin Solid Rocket Boosters, each consisting of four solid rocket motor segments, and the three Main Engines.
The seven-member crew of the STS-114 Return to Flight mission to the International Space Station in May is the first step in realizing the Vision for Space Exploration, which calls for a stepping stone strategy of human and robotic missions to achieve new exploration goals. The Shuttle will be used to complete assembly of the International Space Station, a vital research platform for human endurance in space and a test bed for technologies and techniques that will enable longer journeys to the Moon, Mars and beyond.
The Space Shuttle Propulsion Office at the Marshall Center manages the Tank project. Lockheed Martin Space Systems Co., in New Orleans, is the primary contractor.
 Signature --------------
Jacques :-)
www.spacepatches.info
Larry - 09 Mar 2005 22:36 GMT Is there a schedule when the tank will come through the Canaveral Locks?
> Space Shuttle's Second Redesigned External Tank to Ship from Michoud > [quoted text clipped - 76 lines] > project. Lockheed Martin Space Systems Co., in New Orleans, is the primary > contractor. Brian Gaff - 10 Mar 2005 10:07 GMT I find it incredible that these measurements were not done years ago, surely they are vital for any experimental vehicle, and may validate or otherwise computer models that will be needed to be accurate for ny future designed spacecraft.
Brian
 Signature Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email. graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Space Shuttle's Second Redesigned External Tank to Ship from Michoud > [quoted text clipped - 93 lines] > project. Lockheed Martin Space Systems Co., in New Orleans, is the primary > contractor. Tim K. - 12 Mar 2005 04:38 GMT > Space Shuttle's Second Redesigned External Tank to Ship from Michoud > > ...to Florida's Banana River, which pours into the Atlantic > Ocean, usually takes four to five days. That line always makes me laugh.
LooseChanj - 12 Mar 2005 09:57 GMT >> Space Shuttle's Second Redesigned External Tank to Ship from Michoud >> >> ...to Florida's Banana River, which pours into the Atlantic >> Ocean, usually takes four to five days. > > That line always makes me laugh. Are they really rivers tho'? I don't normally think of them as flowing. Ever.
 Signature This is a siggy | To E-mail, do note | Just because something It's properly formatted | who you mean to reply-to | is possible, doesn't No person, none, care | and it will reach me | mean it can happen
Dale - 12 Mar 2005 11:46 GMT >>> Space Shuttle's Second Redesigned External Tank to Ship from Michoud >>> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Are they really rivers tho'? I don't normally think of them as flowing. Ever. No- "lagoon" or "estuary" would probably be a better name. But they must flow/drain with the tides, don't they?
Dale
Tim K. - 12 Mar 2005 18:48 GMT > >> Space Shuttle's Second Redesigned External Tank to Ship from Michoud > >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Are they really rivers tho'? I don't normally think of them as flowing. Ever. Lagoons - there is some wind-driven flow but they aren't rivers and they certainly don't "pour" into the sea.
John - 14 Mar 2005 14:36 GMT The Banana and connected Indian Rivers are in fact, lagoons and there is some flow, as an earlier poster noted, as the result of tides. It has been a very long time since I went out thorough Port Canaveral but I will never forget the currents going in and out of Sebastian Inlet, next inlet south of Canveral. They were NOT gentle.
You could also see the impacts of the tides easily from the air. An incoming tide would create a large area of "cleaner, clearer" water in the river while an ebbing tide would create a brownish smudge in the ocean.
best to all
JP
Tim K. - 14 Mar 2005 23:11 GMT > The Banana and connected Indian Rivers are in fact, lagoons and there > is some flow, as an earlier poster noted, as the result of tides. It > has been a very long time since I went out thorough Port Canaveral but > I will never forget the currents going in and out of Sebastian Inlet, > next inlet south of Canveral. They were NOT gentle. Yep - part of that is by design. They constructed the inlet with a strong flow to help keep it scoured out.
I did some consulting on a dredging project a few years back in the St. Lucie inlet and running it at night got hairy a few times. These inlets can be rough (apologies to anyone who's fished for crabs in Alaska;)
Scott M. Kozel - 15 Mar 2005 03:23 GMT > > The Banana and connected Indian Rivers are in fact, lagoons and there > > is some flow, as an earlier poster noted, as the result of tides. It [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Lucie inlet and running it at night got hairy a few times. These inlets can > be rough (apologies to anyone who's fished for crabs in Alaska;) The Banana and Indian Rivers also are the destination of rain-induced waterflow from the mainland creeks and from the mainland land itself, and the water that flows into the rivers will eventually make it out the inlets into the ocean.
Tim K. - 15 Mar 2005 23:20 GMT > The Banana and Indian Rivers also are the destination of rain-induced > waterflow from the mainland creeks and from the mainland land itself, > and the water that flows into the rivers will eventually make it out the > inlets into the ocean. Yeah to split hairs... but the BRL is fairly landlocked to use the verb "pours"; that's what always makes me laugh. I'd buy "seeps" or "slinks" maybe.
John - 17 Mar 2005 16:11 GMT Scott,
I agree with you there . . . it may somewhere . . . but I have never seen the Banana River "flow" visibily
Take care . . .
John
Scott M. Kozel - 18 Mar 2005 00:18 GMT > Scott, > > I agree with you there . . . it may somewhere . . . but I have never > seen the Banana River "flow" visibily I don't think that it would be visible to the eye, but instruments could detect it. Heavy tides and heavy rainfalls could lift the water level by one to two feet, and then it will gradually flow out into the ocean through the inlets.
The Java tsunami in December hit the Florida coast with a series of 9-inch waves, and while the effect was said to be invisible to the eye, it was quite visible on tidal instruments.
John - 15 Mar 2005 03:55 GMT Oh, I do know what you mean about rough. It may not be the mouth of the Columbia River, but I went out and back in Sebastian Inlet many times and it could be hairy as you said. I considered it the toughest of the inlets on the Florida east coast. Once, I was asleep in the cuddy cabin as my dad was taking us out. I was awakened by a tremendous slam to find myself floating between the berth and the overhead - my first, and most likely, only microgravity experience. I then crashed back into the berth (any landing you can walk away from . . .)
My dad tells me that he had taken a swell after it broke, and that according to a witness on the north jetty, the boat was near vertical after striking the whitewater. Considering it was a 25' Bertram sportsfisherman, I will take the account with a grain of salt, but I can attest to the wildness of the ride inside the cabin.
Blue (and smooth) skies.
Tim K. - 15 Mar 2005 23:21 GMT > Oh, I do know what you mean about rough. It may not be the mouth of the > Columbia River, but I went out and back in Sebastian Inlet many times [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Blue (and smooth) skies. I've seen some pretty big boats have a wild ride in that one.
|
|
|