> "Chuck Stewart" <zapkitty@gmx.co.uk> wrote in message
>> msnbc hubble poll results at 5:30 am EST 2005-01-22
>> http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6853085/
>> What should be done with the Hubble Space Telescope?
>> * 6268 responses
>> Send a shuttle to fix it, despite the cost and the
>> risk of tragedy.
>> 61%
> Bah.... talk about biasing the vote. Gotta love the language.
And, even with that lead in, public opinion (according to msnbc) is
still for it.
I was just interested in the way their polls can tally 101% to 104% of
the voters :)

Signature
Chuck Stewart
"Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?"
rk - 23 Jan 2005 04:01 GMT
> I was just interested in the way their polls can tally 101% to 104% of
> the voters :)
Like the thrust levels of the SSMEs.

Signature
rk, Just an OldEngineer
"Engineers abhor extrapolation"
-- Ken Iliff, from _Runway to Orbit_, 2004
bw - 23 Jan 2005 07:47 GMT
>> I was just interested in the way their polls can tally 101% to 104% of
>> the voters :)
>
> Like the thrust levels of the SSMEs.
Exactly the same. Well, except that SSME thrust specs are documented and
easily understood.
I suspect television reports involving numbers are less easily confirmed
when audited.