Well, I cannot see them, but they are mostly composites and not processed.
As they only had a couple of hours of life, then I'd imagine there was some
form of compression.
Brian

Signature
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Theres a lot of chatter on the photo newsgroups about the apparent low
> resolution of the images coming back from Titan.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> them because its not built into Windows and I have no reason to explain
> this.
>Theres a lot of chatter on the photo newsgroups about the apparent low
>resolution of the images coming back from Titan.
The main reason for relatively low resolution is simply that the probe's
radio system did not have the high data rates needed to send back lots of
high-resolution pictures in the time available.
>Are these first images going to be later enhanced with more digital data
>returning from Cassini?
No, what we've got now is all we get.
>What type of encoding was used? Are they .jpg or what?
I'm not sure exactly what Huygens used (bear in mind that it was
originally slated to launch in 1995, so it was designed with about 1990
technology), but the general fashion in such things is schemes similar to
JPEG but not exactly identical.

Signature
"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
-- George Herbert | henry@spsystems.net