Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / January 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Why are Huygens photos so fuzzy?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nomen Nescio - 19 Jan 2005 22:10 GMT
Theres a lot of chatter on the photo newsgroups about the apparent low
resolution of the images coming back from Titan.

Are these first images going to be later enhanced with more digital data
returning from Cassini?  What type of encoding was used?  Are they .jpg or
what?

I don't know if jpeg2000 was invented yet at the time of launch, but jp2 is
amazing.  It compresses to 1/10 the size of regular .jpg and the images are
just as good!  jp2 might be the best kept secret in computing because I've
only run into it once on the binaries.  It takes a special viewer to decode
them because its not built into Windows and I have no reason to explain
this.
Brian Gaff - 20 Jan 2005 11:16 GMT
Well, I cannot see them, but they are mostly composites and not processed.
As they only had a couple of hours of life, then I'd imagine there was some
form of compression.

Brian

Signature

Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

> Theres a lot of chatter on the photo newsgroups about the apparent low
> resolution of the images coming back from Titan.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> them because its not built into Windows and I have no reason to explain
> this.
Henry Spencer - 20 Jan 2005 17:08 GMT
>Theres a lot of chatter on the photo newsgroups about the apparent low
>resolution of the images coming back from Titan.

The main reason for relatively low resolution is simply that the probe's
radio system did not have the high data rates needed to send back lots of
high-resolution pictures in the time available.

>Are these first images going to be later enhanced with more digital data
>returning from Cassini?

No, what we've got now is all we get.

>What type of encoding was used?  Are they .jpg or what?

I'm not sure exactly what Huygens used (bear in mind that it was
originally slated to launch in 1995, so it was designed with about 1990
technology), but the general fashion in such things is schemes similar to
JPEG but not exactly identical.
Signature

"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend."    |   Henry Spencer
                               -- George Herbert       | henry@spsystems.net

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.