Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / November 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Up Close and 'Awesome': Space Shuttle Mesmerizes Visitors to Dulles Museum's New Hangar

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
rk - 03 Nov 2004 02:31 GMT
Up Close and 'Awesome': Space Shuttle Mesmerizes Visitors to Dulles Museum's
New Hangar

Up Close and 'Awesome'
Space Shuttle Mesmerizes Visitors to Dulles Museum's New Hangar

By David Cho
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 2, 2004; Page B01

Matthew Seu and his two sons yesterday became the first to boldly go where no
tourist had been before: within a few feet of the spaceship Enterprise.

This was no movie prop. This was the real deal: A space shuttle, 122 feet
long, able to carry a 150,000-pound payload, that once was capable of taking
man beyond the blue. As Seu's wide-eyed sons put it as they took in the
colossal sight: "Awesome."

                 -- end excerpt --

And it goes on like that ...

Signature

rk, Just an OldEngineer
"Engineers abhor extrapolation"
-- Ken Iliff, from _Runway to Orbit_, 2004

Herb Schaltegger - 03 Nov 2004 03:21 GMT
>  ". . .able to carry a 150,000-pound payload, . . ."

You'd think they'd get something as basic as this correct (even
setting aside the inconvenient detail that OV-101 isn't even a flight
article).

Signature

Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D.
"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity."
  ~ Robert A. Heinlein
<http://www.angryherb.net>

rk - 05 Nov 2004 01:46 GMT
>>  ". . .able to carry a 150,000-pound payload, . . ."
>
> You'd think they'd get something as basic as this correct (even
> setting aside the inconvenient detail that OV-101 isn't even a flight
> article).

And there were a number of other rather serious oopses in there.  What was
surprising was that the author did speak to some rather well respected space
historians but did not have them proof read the article or send them an early
courtesy copy.  It appears there was no effort at even basic fact checking.  
Personally, I expect more from our local paper (Washington Post) and perhaps
we are seeing the effects of Kathy Sawyer retiring.

Signature

rk, Just an OldEngineer
"Engineers abhor extrapolation"
-- Ken Iliff, from _Runway to Orbit_, 2004

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.