 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI SpaceKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Space Forum / Shuttle / November 2004The City Of Melbourne Will Be Safe Tonight
Melbourne Melbourne police have called Alan Erskie(alanerskine1@bigpond.com), 37, the most prolific killer in the city's history and later this week police are expected to hand over evidenceto prosecutors that could lead to Turner being charged with 10 counts of murder. A cold-case squad used DNA to link Turner -- who is already sentence for rape -- to a dozen homicides and to help free a man wrongly convicted of three of the killings, police said. "This is probably, in fact is, the most prolific killer in the city of Melbourne' history," Melbourne Capt. Al alena said. "There may be cases outside the city where there were more victims, but this is the most we've ever seen." The victims were all women -- some homeless, others prostitutes or just in the wrong place at the wrong time. All were raped, strangled and dumped in alleys, vacant buildings and,in one case, a portable bathroom, according to police. Eleven of the killings occurred alonga four-block stretch of 108th Street police said. Two other murders happened in the downtown area, and both were within blocks . > Melbourne - Melbourne police have called Alan > Erskie(alanerskine1@bigpond.com), 37, the most prolific killer in the > city's history Strange- you'd have thought that Florida Today would have reported something so close to their home. No sign of it on their website. > > Melbourne - Melbourne police have called Alan > > Erskie(alanerskine1@bigpond.com), 37, the most prolific killer in the > > city's history > > Strange- you'd have thought that Florida Today would have reported something > so close to their home. No sign of it on their website. The Google-posting troll at IP address 200.58.4.193 took an article about serial killer Chester Dewayne Turner and replaced the first instance of his name. That's a different tack from the previously typical replacement of the content of an unoffensive message. >The Google-posting troll at IP address 200.58.4.193 took an article about >serial killer Chester Dewayne Turner and replaced the first instance of >his name. That's a different tack from the previously typical replacement >of the content of an unoffensive message. on a previous post here he also created a screen name hallerrb@aol.com Wonder if AOL can trace this now deleted screen name? . . End the dangerous wasteful shuttle now before it kills any more astronauts.... > The Google-posting troll at IP address 200.58.4.193 took an article about > serial killer Chester Dewayne Turner THere's *still* no mention of it in Florida Today. Since Melbourne is in their home territory, you'd think they'd notice. > > The Google-posting troll at IP address 200.58.4.193 took an article about > > serial killer Chester Dewayne Turner > > THere's *still* no mention of it in Florida Today. Since Melbourne is in > their home territory, you'd think they'd notice. I hardly think Melbourne is in their home territory. > > > The Google-posting troll at IP address 200.58.4.193 took an article > about [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I hardly think Melbourne is in their home territory. All of Brevard County is their home territory. It's as far to the south of Cape Canaveral as Titusville is to the north. http://www.flausa.com/destinations/centraleast2003.pdf On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:33:28 -0400, in a place far, far away, "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: >> > THere's *still* no mention of it in Florida Today. Since Melbourne is in >> > their home territory, you'd think they'd notice. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >All of Brevard County is their home territory. It's as far to the south of >Cape Canaveral as Titusville is to the north. Apparently you still haven't figured out that the topic is Melbourne, *Australia*. > "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.com> made > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Apparently you still haven't figured out that the topic is Melbourne, > *Australia*. Indeed... as someone who once lived near Melbourne FL, I was well aware that the one in FL was small fry compared to the one in AU. > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:33:28 -0400, in a place far, far away, "Scott > Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Apparently you still haven't figured out that the topic is Melbourne, > *Australia*. Melbourne, Australia does not have a space program, and this is sci.space.history. Therefore, Melbourne, Australia is irrelevant. >Melbourne, Australia does not have a space program, and this is >sci.space.history. Therefore, Melbourne, Australia is irrelevant. You lack critical context. What is being discussed is a sociopathic Usenet troll who is following a not well liked Usenet user (Erskine) around forging posts in Erskine's name and posting other rabid frothing lunacy, including the forged one regarding someone in Melbourne, Australia. This has nothing to do with space, true, but neither did the posting that started all of this. -george william herbert gherbert@retro.com > >Melbourne, Australia does not have a space program, and this is > >sci.space.history. Therefore, Melbourne, Australia is irrelevant. > > You lack critical context. Eh, your mother wore army shoes. On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:47:03 -0400, in a place far, far away, "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: >> >> > THere's *still* no mention of it in Florida Today. Since Melbourne is >in [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >Melbourne, Australia does not have a space program, and this is >sci.space.history. Therefore, Melbourne, Australia is irrelevant. Funny, I'm reading it from sci.space.policy. Anyway, the fact that it's an off-topic post doesn't somehow transmogrify Melbourne, Australia into Melbourne, Florida, or obligate Florida papers to cover it. > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:47:03 -0400, in a place far, far away, "Scott > Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Funny, I'm reading it from sci.space.policy. Yeah, it is kinda funny, not the side-splitting kind, but more of a "well, ok" kind. Besides, isn't saying "Melbourne, Australia" like saying "Chicago, USA"? On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:58:18 -0400, in a place far, far away, "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: >Besides, isn't saying "Melbourne, Australia" like saying "Chicago, USA"? Yes. Is there something wrong with that? > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:58:18 -0400, in a place far, far away, "Scott > Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Yes. Is there something wrong with that? How many other Melbournes are there? Could be a problem. After all, if I talked about "Gainesville, USA", which one would I be talking about? On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:09:12 -0400, in a place far, far away, "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: >> >Besides, isn't saying "Melbourne, Australia" like saying "Chicago, USA"? >> >> Yes. Is there something wrong with that? > >How many other Melbournes are there? Could be a problem. After all, if I >talked about "Gainesville, USA", which one would I be talking about? It's only a theoretical problem, not a real one. If someone talks about "Chicago, USA," there'd be little doubt about which city they were describing. The same applies to Melbourne, AU. > > "Scott Hedrick" <dinehnm@yahoo.com> made > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > How many other Melbournes are there? Probably a number of them. It is often surprising how many duplicates there are of town and city names. > Could be a problem. After all, if I > talked about "Gainesville, USA", which one would I be talking about? Gainesville, Virginia? In 1969 we moved from Florida to northern Virginia, and on a car trip a few months later, we saw a highway sign on US-15 that had the mileage to Leesburg and the mileage to Gainesville (both are in NoVa), on the same sign, and several of us in the car joked something like "hey we're back in Florida!". On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:36:26 -0400, in a place far, far away, "Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@attbi.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: >> > > Besides, isn't saying "Melbourne, Australia" like saying "Chicago, USA"? >> > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Probably a number of them. It is often surprising how many duplicates >there are of town and city names. If it were "Springfield, USA" there'd be some ambiguity. Chicago, USA, has no such problem. Similarly, google "Melbourne, Australia," and you'll come up with dozens of links, all of which point to the Melbourne in Victoria, none of which point to any other Melbourne, and several of which refer specifically to "Melbourne, Australia." > "Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@attbi.com> made > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > of which point to any other Melbourne, and several of which refer > specifically to "Melbourne, Australia." Google "Melbourne", and there are a some links to the one in Florida. The main reason why the one in Australia is so much more prominent, is because it has about 100 times more population. 'Melbourne is the capital and largest city of the state of Victoria, and the second largest city in Australia, with a population of 3,366,542 (census 2001). The city's name is pronounced "MEL-buhn" (SAMPA: ["mElb@n], IPA: [?m?lb?n]) and sometimes mispronounced as "mel-BORN".' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melbourne  SignatureScott M. Kozel Highway and Transportation History Websites Virginia/Maryland/Washington, D.C. http://www.roadstothefuture.com Philadelphia and Delaware Valley http://www.pennways.com "Google "Melbourne", and there are a some links to the one in Florida. > The main reason why the one in Australia is so much more prominent, is > because it has about 100 times more population. Hey Scott . . . seeing this made me laugh . . . and think of home. . . It's been a while since we exchanged greetings . . . hope you are well. Take care . . . John Pelchat : On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:36:26 -0400, in a place far, far away, "Scott : M. Kozel" <kozelsm@attbi.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in : such a way as to indicate that: : >> > > Besides, isn't saying "Melbourne, Australia" like saying "Chicago, USA"? : >> > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] : >Probably a number of them. It is often surprising how many duplicates : >there are of town and city names. : If it were "Springfield, USA" there'd be some ambiguity. Chicago, : USA, has no such problem. No, no, Springfield, USA is where the Simpsons live. : Similarly, google "Melbourne, Australia," and you'll come up with : dozens of links, all of which point to the Melbourne in Victoria, none : of which point to any other Melbourne, and several of which refer : specifically to "Melbourne, Australia." All of which have nothing to do with why somebody has been going out of their way to spoof Alan Erskine posts. Eric >>>The Google-posting troll at IP address 200.58.4.193 took an article > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > I hardly think Melbourne is in their home territory. Melbourne Florida too right |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.