Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / March 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Next Space Ship Name => CALYPSO

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Federico Iglesias - 01 Mar 2004 15:58 GMT
Ayear ago I proposed to name "CALYPSO" a future Space Ship. The
resonse whas overwhelming, but I wonder if either NASA or the European
Space Agency (ESA) have any plans to do so. In any case, here is the
original post in hope that someone close to the space programs at
either NASA or ESA takes note of this initiative.

At this point, we don't know if the next space ship will actually be
The Space Shuttle, as we know it now. In any case, a new spaceship
(i.e.
Space Shuttle) would have to be built with new design and technology
and be launched soon (we hope).

So, a name for the next Space Shuttle would have to be suggested. I
understand that Shuttles are named after scientific exploration ocean
ships, and the name has to be at least three syllables long. Some
people have suggested the name CALYPSO, after Captain Jacques Yves
Cousteau's research ship known and loved by television audiences all
over the globe. And I agree: the next NASA's Space Shuttle shall be
named CALYPSO. ( www.cousteausociety.org/tcs_calypso.html ).

Captain Cousteau was very much aware and supportive of the space
program. Back in 1993, I was privileged to ask him about how he
envisioned the extension of the CALYPSO experience into the space
program. And I learned from his response that he was quite involved
with NASA and supportive of the space program. Also, I recently had an
email exchange with Mr. Clark Lee Merriam, Research & Communications
Official at the Cousteau Society ( www.cousteausociety.org ) who
provided me new light about Captain Cousteau's vision of the space
program. He told me that After the Challenger tragedy of 1986, Captain
Cousteau wrote to President Reagan. His letter read in part, "The
world is in mourning, but public opinion unanimously supports your
decision to carry on. As a token of my deep solidarity, I wish to
express my sincere desire to take part in one of the next shuttle
flights."

So, I am certain that if the next Space-Shuttle is named CALYPSO, it
will be well accepted by people all over the world, who will become
more involved with the space program, so much as to justify TV
prime-time exposure worldwide.

Best regards,

Federico Iglesias
Monterrey, N.L. MEXICO
Federico@Iglesias.com
http://www.Federico.Iglesias.com
Greg Mossman - 01 Mar 2004 17:21 GMT
> So, I am certain that if the next Space-Shuttle is named CALYPSO, it
> will be well accepted by people all over the world, who will become
> more involved with the space program, so much as to justify TV
> prime-time exposure worldwide.

The next space shuttle and all space shuttles are American.  No one will
listen to you, an un-American, whether you want to call it Calypso or Jesus.
Build your own frickin' shuttle if you want to name one.  In the meantime,
take this crap off our precious diving newsgroup.
Brian Gaff - 01 Mar 2004 19:19 GMT
and you make sure you read the list of newsgroups before you  get hot under
the collar about an opinion which is as much justified as  anyone elses...

I like the idea, but somehow, it does not seem right for a spacecraft name
to me.

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
____________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________

| > So, I am certain that if the next Space-Shuttle is named CALYPSO, it
| > will be well accepted by people all over the world, who will become
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
| Build your own frickin' shuttle if you want to name one.  In the meantime,
| take this crap off our precious diving newsgroup.
Carlos Santillan - 02 Mar 2004 14:45 GMT
Hi, I'm just another mexican and I think is a great idea to christen
the next shuttle as Calypso.
Greg Mossman - 02 Mar 2004 17:51 GMT
> Hi, I'm just another mexican and I think is a great idea to christen
> the next shuttle as Calypso.

And I'd love for the next Mexican president to be named Dick, but I'm
equally powerless.  I feel for you.
Federico Iglesias - 03 Mar 2004 07:07 GMT
> The next space shuttle and all space shuttles are American.  No one will
> listen to you, an un-American, whether you want to call it Calypso or Jesus.
> Build your own frickin' shuttle if you want to name one.  In the meantime,
> take this crap off our precious diving newsgroup.

Hey Greg Mossman: deep seas & space exploration and knowledge are
universal assets (for that reason you are welcomed to dive here in
Mexico or elsewhere) my suggestion does not make me an "un-American",
and my comment is relevant to this community since it suggets a
tribute to a fellow diver.

... and a word to those who called Cousteau as someone "greedy,
rapacious, and dishonest": he was not. Cousteau was truly a citizen of
the world. His work as an environmentalist is hailed by divers
worldwide and marine biologists. His legacy includes among other
accomplishments, inventions such as the aqua-lung and the one-man
submarine that ushered in a new era of underwater discovery. The
Cousteau Society is dedicated to the protection of ocean life and
still going strong with 300,000 members worldwide. He was a WW-II
hero, and President Reagan awarded Cousteau the Medal of Freedom in
1985. Cousteau never stopped championing the deep blue seas. I had the
privilege of meeting and talking to him, and to this day I've witness
how popular he remains.
Alan Street - 03 Mar 2004 07:25 GMT
#"Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message
#news:<40437019$0$75800$6c56adcd@news.qnet.com>...
#> The next space shuttle and all space shuttles are American.  No one will
#> listen to you, an un-American, whether you want to call it Calypso or Jesus.
#> Build your own frickin' shuttle if you want to name one.  In the meantime,
#> take this crap off our precious diving newsgroup.
#
#Hey Greg Mossman: deep seas & space exploration and knowledge are
#universal assets (for that reason you are welcomed to dive here in
#Mexico or elsewhere) my suggestion does not make me an "un-American",
#and my comment is relevant to this community since it suggets a
#tribute to a fellow diver.
#
#... and a word to those who called Cousteau as someone "greedy,
#rapacious, and dishonest": he was not. Cousteau was truly a citizen of
#the world. His work as an environmentalist is hailed by divers
#worldwide

<snicker>

and marine biologists. His legacy includes among other
#accomplishments, inventions such as the aqua-lung and the one-man
#submarine that ushered in a new era of underwater discovery. The
#Cousteau Society is dedicated to the protection of ocean life and
#still going strong with 300,000 members worldwide. He was a WW-II
#hero, and President Reagan awarded Cousteau the Medal of Freedom in
#1985. Cousteau never stopped championing the deep blue seas. I had the
#privilege of meeting and talking to him, and to this day I've witness
#how popular he remains.

But obviously, you're not a diver yourself and have never ventured into
the world highlighted by Capt. Cousteau. Tell me, as a Mexican, would
you object to having your country personified by Cortez?
Greg Mossman - 05 Mar 2004 00:03 GMT
> But obviously, you're not a diver yourself and have never ventured into
> the world highlighted by Capt. Cousteau. Tell me, as a Mexican, would
> you object to having your country personified by Cortez?

I've dove in the Sea of Cortez.  He must have been a hero for the country to
name an entire sea after him.  Heck, Cousteau just got a lousy Medal of
Freedom.

I vote we name the next space shuttle Cortez to show that space exploration
is good for the gander.
mike gray - 03 Mar 2004 14:50 GMT
> ... and a word to those who called Cousteau as someone "greedy,
> rapacious, and dishonest": he was not. Cousteau was truly a citizen of
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> privilege of meeting and talking to him, and to this day I've witness
> how popular he remains.

Cousteau certainly did a great deal to popularize diving and exploration
of the underwater world. But the man does not live up to the myth he
created.

He did not "invent" the Aqua Lung, Emile Gagnan did and Air Liquide
(Cousteau's father-in-law was a director of the company) held the
patents. Prior to 1953, Aqua Lungs in North America were made by Gagnan
in Canada.

In 1953, Air Liquide learned that the US Navy was about to put out a bid
for a quarter million dollar’s worth of regulators (that’s about 10,000
units at twenty five bucks each!) Cousteau was sent to the US to buy out
his cousin, Rene Bussoz who was one of the US distributors for Air
Liquide's Aqua Lung, operating under the name US Divers. US Divers was
made a subsidiary of La Spirotechnique (which it still is) and Cousteau
was named its head.

As head of US Divers, the first thing Cousteau did was hire an army of
lawyers to sue everyone selling regulators. This was about the same time
that E.R. Cross and Ted Eldred were inventing the modern single hose
regulator that we use today.

The only Air Liquide patent of any merit was the location of the exhaust
valve, and even that did not hold up in his patent infringement suit
against Arnie Post. His double hose regulator quickly became obsolete.

And one man subs were around and in quite common use a long time before
Cousteau ever went diving. Which, by the way, was in the 1930's using Le
Prieur gear.

This "WW-II hero" spent the French occupation at his estate in Bandol
testing Gagnan's equipment, and when the Free French went back to battle
(in which Georges Commeinhes, who held the scuba depth record at the
time, on equipment of his own design, was getting killed at the battle
of Austerlitz), Cousteau was in England, a salesman for Air Liquide
trying to peddle the Aqua Lung to the Allies. None of whom bought it.

Cousteau championed the deep blue seas and the movements that came with
it because it benefited Cousteau, Inc.

To raise capital for his Calypso marine exploration projects, Cousteau
shamelessly promoted himself as inventor of all dive gear and discoverer
of everything underwater. He became a force behind The Skin Diver
Magazine, NAUI, and NASDS.  Cousteau promoted Cousteau and the Aqua Lung
while ignoring the contributions of others with equal ruthlessness. In
“The Silent World”, the name Gagnan appears twice, and only in passing,
and Air Liquide is not mentioned at all. Tailliez and Dumas,
co-developers of the Aqua Lung, had assumed they would be named
co-authors of that book (which was actually written by an American,
James Dugan) and both were surprized and pissed when they were left off
the title page. Gagnan disappeared completely from the regulator label
with the 1968 Golden Royal Aquamaster celebrating the 25th anniversary
of his Aqua Lung. Cousteau’s underwater filming never credited Hans
Hass, who had developed most of the equipment and techniques years
before.  And Cousteau died in the midst of a bitter legal battle with
his own son over use of the name “Cousteau”.

There is no question that the Aqua Lung and Cousteau’s films, books,
explorations, and other promotions hugely popularized and commercialized
recreational SCUBA, for which Cousteau deserves great credit along with
Sea Hunt, The Skin Diver, PADI, and dozens of others.

Just don't believe everything Cousteau told you about Cousteau.
mike gray - 03 Mar 2004 15:21 GMT
And one additional note:

Cousteau was stupefyingly ignorant of the life sciences. He believed,
for instance, that the use of scuba would enable man to develop the
ability to live under water without the use of artifices.

Cousteau the promoter was smart enough to surround himself with bright
scientists, authors, photographers, and others.
chilly - 03 Mar 2004 17:40 GMT
(snip)> There is no question that the Aqua Lung and Cousteau’s films, books,
> explorations, and other promotions hugely popularized and commercialized
> recreational SCUBA, for which Cousteau deserves great credit along with
> Sea Hunt, The Skin Diver, PADI, and dozens of others.
>
> Just don't believe everything Cousteau told you about Cousteau.

Didn't he also blow a hole in the coral surrounds of the Great Blue Hole so
that he could get the Calypso in there?
mike gray - 03 Mar 2004 18:59 GMT
> (snip)> There is no question that the Aqua Lung and Cousteau’s films, books,
>> explorations, and other promotions hugely popularized and commercialized
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Didn't he also blow a hole in the coral surrounds of the Great Blue Hole so
> that he could get the Calypso in there?

One of his smaller sins. He never let a little thing like a coral reef
stand between him and a television production.
Dennis (Icarus) - 03 Mar 2004 11:39 GMT
> > So, I am certain that if the next Space-Shuttle is named CALYPSO, it
> > will be well accepted by people all over the world, who will become
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Build your own frickin' shuttle if you want to name one.  In the meantime,
> take this crap off our precious diving newsgroup.

Yes, keep it off rec.scuba.
its interfering with the politics, guns, sex, and sniping threads. :-)

Dennis
Bruce Palmer - 01 Mar 2004 18:32 GMT
[pile of steaming crap snipped]

> Federico Iglesias
> Monterrey, N.L. MEXICO
> Federico@Iglesias.com
> http://www.Federico.Iglesias.com

                               _________________________
                       /|  /| |                         |
                       ||__|| |      Please do not      |
                      /   O O\__    feed the Trolls.    |
                     /          \      Thank You.       |
                    /      \     \                      |
                   /   _    \     \---------------------´
                  /    |\____\     \     ||
                 /     | | | |\____/     ||
                /       \|_|_|/   |     _||
               /  /  \            |____| ||
              /   |   |           |      --|
              |   |   |           |____  --|
       * _    |  |_|_|_|          |     \-/
    *-- _--\ _ \                  |      ||
      /  _     \\        |        /      `´
   *  /   \_ /- |       |       |
      *      ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________

I left the email addy intact for spam harvesters :0

Signature

bp
Proud Member of the Human O-Ring Society Since 2003
(replace ".dot." in email address with ".")

Brian Thorn - 01 Mar 2004 22:36 GMT
>Ayear ago I proposed to name "CALYPSO" a future Space Ship.

The next U.S. manned spacecraft series has been tentatively named
"Constellation", in the same way as earlier "Mercury", "Gemini", and
"Apollo" spacecraft.

If Constellations are throwaway spacecraft, NASA might decide to
simply call them "Constellation 1", "Constellation 2" etc. Or they
might allow the crews to name their individual spacecraft. Or NASA
might choose the names itself, invoking a theme for their names...
since the series is called "Constellation", their individual names
might be those of constellations ("Orion", "Taurus", etc.)

If they are reusable, NASA will probably assign names such as Columbia
and Atlantis. "Calypso" was among the names proposed for the fifth
Space Shuttle, but the name "Endeavour" was chosen after a competition
by United States grade school children.

Brian
Dave Michelson - 02 Mar 2004 09:15 GMT
> If they are reusable, NASA will probably assign names such as Columbia and
> Atlantis. "Calypso" was among the names proposed for the fifth Space
> Shuttle, but the name "Endeavour" was chosen after a competition by United
> States grade school children.

Of course, the cynical among us suspect that the objective of the competition
was simply to guess the name that had already been chosen by the powers that
be ;-)

Signature

Dave Michelson
davem@ece.ubc.ca

Hallerb - 02 Mar 2004 12:42 GMT
>> If they are reusable, NASA will probably assign names such as Columbia and
>> Atlantis. "Calypso" was among the names proposed for the fifth Space
>> Shuttle, but the name "Endeavour" was chosen after a competition by United
>> States grade school children.

I am relieved they didnt choose calypso. Imagine the C concers for the
astronauts familys:(
Roger Balettie - 02 Mar 2004 14:04 GMT
> I am relieved they didnt choose calypso. Imagine the C concers for the
> astronauts familys:(

Fortunately... astronauts and their families have far more intelligence than
that to be worried about a *letter*.

Seriously...  we don't worry about black cats or broken mirrors either.

<tongue-in-cheek> Maybe management should?  </tongue-in-cheek>

Roger
Signature

Roger Balettie
former Flight Dynamics Officer
Space Shuttle Mission Control
http://www.balettie.com/

rk - 02 Mar 2004 14:25 GMT
>> I am relieved they didnt choose calypso. Imagine the C concers for the
>> astronauts familys:(
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> <tongue-in-cheek> Maybe management should?  </tongue-in-cheek>

Yes, "cat" starts with the letter "c."

Signature

rk, Just an OldEngineer
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for nature cannot be fooled."
-- R. Feynman, Appendix F.

Hallerb - 02 Mar 2004 15:55 GMT
>Fortunately... astronauts and their families have far more intelligence than
>that to be worried about a *letter*

The most intelligentn person I EVER met was a hubble controller. Believe it or
not he was superstitious. Remarked the ONLY shuttle launch he didnt watch in
real time was challenger. We talked of superstions.

Even intelligent folks believe in such things or perhaps they are so smart
stuff like that just makes them wonder?
Alan Erskine - 02 Mar 2004 20:21 GMT
> > I am relieved they didnt choose calypso. Imagine the C concers for the
> > astronauts familys:(
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Space Shuttle Mission Control
> http://www.balettie.com/

Roger, it's called a Killfile - if you killfile Chicken Little like most
other people, you won't see his 'reespnosez' and we won't see any replies.

--
Alan Erskine
We can get people to the Moon in five years,
not the fifteen GWB proposes.
Give NASA a real challenge
Alanterskine1@bigpond.com
Nick Hull - 01 Mar 2004 22:56 GMT
> So, I am certain that if the next Space-Shuttle is named CALYPSO, it
> will be well accepted by people all over the world, who will become
> more involved with the space program, so much as to justify TV
> prime-time exposure worldwide.

Please, no more spaceships starting with "C", Nasa has lost two of them
already.

Signature

free men own guns - slaves don't
www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5357/

Jorge R. Frank - 01 Mar 2004 23:07 GMT
Nick Hull <nhull@access4less.net> wrote in news:nhull-
234198.17561601032004@corp.supernews.com:

>> So, I am certain that if the next Space-Shuttle is named CALYPSO, it
>> will be well accepted by people all over the world, who will become
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Please, no more spaceships starting with "C", Nasa has lost two of them
> already.

By the same token, the Russians should have no more spaceships starting
with "S".

Oops...

Signature

JRF

Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.

Charleston - 02 Mar 2004 05:07 GMT
> >> So, I am certain that if the next Space-Shuttle is named CALYPSO, it
> >> will be well accepted by people all over the world, who will become
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> By the same token, the Russians should have no more spaceships starting
> with "S".

The word Constellation starts with the letter C.  What's up with that?
There are 88 constellations in the Northern hemisphere.  Oh and 22 of them
start with, you guessed it the letter "C".

"Liftoff, we have liftoff of the 66th space shuttle mission and it has
cleared the tower."

"Roll program"...

..."Norma, go at throttle-up."

Yep, Norma is one those 88 constellations.  Really.  I am being on the
"level".

My favorite shuttle ironically is the Constellation class "Microscopium."

Signature

Daniel
http://www.challengerdisaster.info
Mount Charleston, not Charleston, SC

Charleston - 02 Mar 2004 05:08 GMT
Oops 88 constellations period.

Signature

Daniel
http://www.challengerdisaster.info
Mount Charleston, not Charleston, SC

Brian Thorn - 02 Mar 2004 00:28 GMT
>> So, I am certain that if the next Space-Shuttle is named CALYPSO, it
>> will be well accepted by people all over the world, who will become
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Please, no more spaceships starting with "C", Nasa has lost two of them
>already.

Apollo 16's "Casper" bucks the trend.

Brian
Dave Kenworthy - 02 Mar 2004 01:33 GMT
> Apollo 16's "Casper" bucks the trend.
>
> Brian

As does Apollo 10's 'Charlie Brown'....

DK

Signature

Dave Kenworthy
-----------------------------
Changes aren't permanent - but change is!

Dennis (Icarus) - 03 Mar 2004 11:42 GMT
> > So, I am certain that if the next Space-Shuttle is named CALYPSO, it
> > will be well accepted by people all over the world, who will become
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Please, no more spaceships starting with "C", Nasa has lost two of them
> already.

And no launches/missions during late jan-early feb.

That seems to be when they lose 'em.

Dennis
Brian Thorn - 03 Mar 2004 20:30 GMT
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 05:42:30 -0600, "Dennis \(Icarus\)"
<nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote:

>And no launches/missions during late jan-early feb.
>
>That seems to be when they lose 'em.

Apollo 14 (31 Jan 71)
STS-41B (3 Feb 84)
STS-51C (24 Jan 85)
STS-51L (28 Jan 86)*
STS-42 (22 Jan 92)
STS-60 (3 Feb 94)
STS-63 (3 Feb 95)
STS-89 (22 Jan 98)
STS-98 (7 Feb 01)
STS-107 (16 Jan 03)*

*failure

Brian
el Stroko Guapo - 02 Mar 2004 14:02 GMT
> Ayear ago I proposed to name "CALYPSO" a future Space Ship. The
> resonse whas overwhelming, but I wonder if either NASA or the European
> Space Agency (ESA) have any plans to do so. In any case, here is the
> original post in hope that someone close to the space programs at
> either NASA or ESA takes note of this initiative.

In 1954, Cousteau refurbished a WW II mine sweeper, named it "Calypso",
and sailed into the Persian Gulf under a contract with British Petroleum
to search for oil. He found it, and used the profits to make the film
"The Silent World", which won an Oscar for its depiction of Cousteau and
his crew gratuitously killing every living creature they came across and
dynamiting coral reefs to get fish counts.

I don't think either NASA or ESA want to be associated with anyone as
greedy, rapacious, and dishonest as Cousteau.

ESG
Bardo - 02 Mar 2004 14:57 GMT
> > Ayear ago I proposed to name "CALYPSO" a future Space Ship. The
> > resonse whas overwhelming, but I wonder if either NASA or the European
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I don't think either NASA or ESA want to be associated with anyone as
> greedy, rapacious, and dishonest as Cousteau.

Well said! My thoughts exactly. Quite why people still look upon Cousteau as
a 'hero' and 'friend' of the ocean is beyond me...
froggy - 04 Mar 2004 13:46 GMT
[...]
> so much as to justify TV prime-time exposure worldwide.

Especially if the plan is to scatter it at sea (again).

Froggy
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.