Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Shuttle / February 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

CEV or SEV  - bleah

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dilbert Firestorm - 21 Feb 2004 02:36 GMT
another apollo style command module big sized......

bleah.
Steve Hix - 21 Feb 2004 03:57 GMT
> another apollo style command module big sized......
>
> bleah.

And this is a problem why?
Dosco Jones - 21 Feb 2004 16:59 GMT
> > another apollo style command module big sized......
> >
> > bleah.
>
> And this is a problem why?

He wants warp drive.
Dilbert Firestorm - 23 Feb 2004 03:51 GMT
>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>  

not warp drive, but a real ship instead of cramped big-sized apollo
command module.
Steve Hix - 23 Feb 2004 06:51 GMT
> >  
> >>In article <c16joh$8or$3@news.datasync.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> not warp drive, but a real ship instead of cramped big-sized apollo
> command module.

Why? The way being proposed is a good deal more flexible, not to mention
easier to boost.
Hallerb - 23 Feb 2004 12:58 GMT
>not warp drive, but a real ship instead of cramped big-sized apollo
>command module.

Why? Is sexy high tech more expensive better than low tech well understood,
easy and safe to build understand & best of all lower cost?

Please explain...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.