> I was thinking about this, and a good rule of thumb might be to consider:
> "Would you design it this way if it was going to be used by scuba divers?"
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> LEO,. considering that their gloves aren't the most agile things in the
> world to work with. :-)
That's because they were able to design a cover to put over it which had
holes in it big enough to undo the fasteners but small enough that the
fasteners couldn't come out of the holes. They didn't have to rely on
catching the screws by hand.
Jeff

Signature
"Take heart amid the deepening gloom
that your dog is finally getting enough cheese" - Deteriorata - National
Lampoon
OM - 06 Jul 2009 18:28 GMT
>That's because they were able to design a cover to put over it which had
>holes in it big enough to undo the fasteners but small enough that the
>fasteners couldn't come out of the holes. They didn't have to rely on
>catching the screws by hand.
...Not that difficult. Just make the diameter of the hole half the
distance between the outermost diameter of the screw threads and the
inner post, then turn the screws in. There's a couple of other tweaks
to pop the attachment away from the base, but that's the basics behind
the concept.
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[