On Jul 27, 12:29 pm, Dr.Colon.Osc...@gmail.com wrote:
> http://www.nasaimages.org/ ..................Doc
What a nearly worthless image archive format.
How many billions did this piss-poor version of eye-candy hype cost
us?
- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
>http://www.nasaimages.org/ ..................Doc
Thanks for the link. One may assume the Guthlessball will promptly claim "it's all fake!"
before too long. (I wouldn't know for sure, as I've killfiled him, and strongly suggest everyone
here do the same thing to that refugee from a lunatic asylum, if you haven't already.)
BradGuth - 30 Jul 2008 06:09 GMT
> Dr.Colon.Osc...@gmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> before too long. (I wouldn't know for sure, as I've killfiled him, and strongly suggest everyone
> here do the same thing to that refugee from a lunatic asylum, if you haven't already.)
It's not fake, just a piss poor format that at best requires a high
speed internet DSL in order to get anywhere, not to mention missing
all the really good images about our physically dark Selene/moon.
- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth