Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space History / July 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

[FWD] Bock's Car Pilot Sweeney dies

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
OM - 18 Jul 2004 10:05 GMT
...Ironically, I was watching both "The Atomic Cafe" and Kuran's
digital remastering of the nuke films this evening when this came
across:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Northeast/07/17/obit.sweeney.ap/index.html

                OM

Signature

"No bastard ever won a war by dying for     | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb bastard die for his country."    | Human O-Ring Society

    - General George S. Patton, Jr

John Beaderstadt - 18 Jul 2004 11:44 GMT
I saw Bock's Car, at Wright-Pat, about five or six years ago.  The way
I remember it, it was hidden 'way back in an unlit corner.  

I saw Enola Gay only three weeks ago, at the new facility next to
Dulles.  She's right in the middle of the hangar but is so surrounded
by smaller craft, in all three dimensions, that she can literally be
said to be hidden in plain sight.  Given the size of the building and
the current lack of exhibits (I'd guess the hangar is only about 25%
occupied . the crowding seems rather obvious.  By contrast, the SR71
is given pride of place: a central location with nothing obscuring the
view.

Neither bomber can be said to be prominently displayed.  Maybe it's
for security, maybe just to avoid more controversy.  There's probably
a reason, but still...

--------------
Beady's Corollary to Occam's Razor:  "The likeliest explanation of any phenomenon is almost always the most boring one imaginable."
OM - 18 Jul 2004 12:10 GMT
>Neither bomber can be said to be prominently displayed.  Maybe it's
>for security, maybe just to avoid more controversy.  There's probably
>a reason, but still...

...If this were NASA, I'd be smelling another PAO rat on this one.
Since the Enola Gay flap between the truth and that bullshit pile of
revisionist crap the Smithsonian's head honchos tried to foist on the
public for the 50th, it's been obvious that there's a lot of liberals
still running the joint who're still pissed about having lost that
particular Political "Correctness" war, and are trying to win whatever
moral "victory" points they can.

Sack the entire lot except for those doing the actual restoration
work, I say.

                OM

Signature

"No bastard ever won a war by dying for     | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb bastard die for his country."    | Human O-Ring Society

    - General George S. Patton, Jr

Guy Parry - 19 Jul 2004 05:10 GMT
    I'd always wondered whether Bock's Car had been saved!  Now I
know, and I'm glad to hear it.  Dropping those two bombs was the best
thing that ever happened to the Japs.

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 06:10:05 -0500, OM
<om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research_facility.org>
wrote:

>>Neither bomber can be said to be prominently displayed.  Maybe it's
>>for security, maybe just to avoid more controversy.  There's probably
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>                OM
Gene DiGennaro - 19 Jul 2004 14:20 GMT
> >Neither bomber can be said to be prominently displayed.  Maybe it's
> >for security, maybe just to avoid more controversy.  There's probably
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>                 OM

Bock's Car has been at Dayton since the early 1960's I believe. from
what I can tell there has bnever been any controversy over its
display. The placaqrds surrounding the a/c basically say " here is the
airplane that dropped the second atomic bomb on Nagasaki". The visitor
can make what they want out of it. There is no force fed
propoganda(right or left wing) surrounding the a/c. For the life of me
I cannot fathom why the NASM cannot follow the USAF's lead. After all,
Nazi German A/C aircraft are protrayed at NASM with propoganda. I seem
to remember a ME-262 on display at the NASM without any placards that
read " this aircraft was built by a regime that exterminated millions
of innocent people".

Rant mode off,

Gene DiGennaro
Baltimore, Md.
Scott Hedrick - 27 Jul 2004 21:56 GMT
> Since the Enola Gay flap between the truth and that bullshit pile of
> revisionist crap the Smithsonian's head honchos tried to foist on the
> public for the 50th, it's been obvious that there's a lot of liberals
> still running the joint who're still pissed about having lost that
> particular Political "Correctness" war, and are trying to win whatever
> moral "victory" points they can.

"Hell, yes, under the same circumstances, I'd do it again."- Paul Tibbets,
signing autographs at the National Atomic Museum.
OM - 27 Jul 2004 22:55 GMT
>"Hell, yes, under the same circumstances, I'd do it again."- Paul Tibbets,
>signing autographs at the National Atomic Museum.

...This deserves to be a standard .sig to be used over on
soc.culture.japan :-)

                OM

Signature

"No bastard ever won a war by dying for     | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb bastard die for his country."    | Human O-Ring Society

    - General George S. Patton, Jr

Scott Hedrick - 29 Jul 2004 03:03 GMT
> >"Hell, yes, under the same circumstances, I'd do it again."- Paul Tibbets,
> >signing autographs at the National Atomic Museum.
>
> ...This deserves to be a standard .sig to be used over on
> soc.culture.japan :-)

He's deaf as a post, but he'd heard the question often enough to be able to
read lips.

I savor the irony of four Japanese tourists standing in line to get books
autographed :)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.