 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI SpaceKB.com Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map |
Space Forum / Space History / June 2004Making Progress!
Well, it's nice to see that since 6/25/04, a total of 10 threads on which LaDonna Wyss was the last poster have been completely ignored. Hey, way to go people! :-) It's even better to note that since 6/25/04, there have been some excellent posts that are completely unrelated to Little Miss Wyss. Way to go, ssh! :-) Those who absolutely felt a need to respond to her rambling retorts have all given her the good swift boot in the a.s that she deserves. So, how has she responded so far? In her typical manner.... With continued attempts to divert attention from her own negative behaviors by pointing fingers at others. Note how she never denied anything. She merely switched the subject! By baiting ssh posters in a desperate attempt to get people to re-engage in a useless and tiresome dialogue with her. It's her pathetic way of saying, "Don't ignore me!" With increased anger and threats. (And she wonders why I don't use my regular email and name!!! I really have no desire to have a crackpot jamming my private email or voice mail systems, thank you very much!) BTW: Has anyone made the interesting connection between her former username (hpywife516) and Scott Grissom's May 16th birthdate? Whaddya bet her favorite perfume is OBSESSION!!! ;-) Hardy har re: 516. Scott asked the same thing when we first talked; it was my anniversary date when I was married, DUMMY. Nice a.s umption, though. As far as posts, again, you a.s u me. Much of my correspondence in the past 48 hours has been by email; apparently those individuals who are SERIOUS about the fire are tired of trying to be "heard" through all the junk messages. Nice try on your "regular email and name." We all know you are yet another "gutless wonder." After all, I've been using my real email and name all along, yet with all of the venom that has been spewed on this newsgroup, I've not received ONE harassing email. Not ONE. But you go ahead and comfort yourself with that ridiculous explanation for your cowardly, childish, and erroneous behavior. LaDonna >Nice a.s umption, > though. > As far as posts, again, you a.s u me. This is the wrong forum to solicit in, LaToya. Betty and "scott" not satisfying you? >Much of my correspondence in the > past 48 hours has been by email; "The lurkers support me in email!" How are your imaginary friends, anyway? > with all of the venom that has been spewed on this > newsgroup They're *your* posts. > Well, it's nice to see that since 6/25/04, a total of 10 threads on > which LaDonna Wyss was the last poster have been completely ignored. > Hey, way to go people! :-) http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.space.history/about Shows her to have made 645 posts this month. That's an average of over 23 per day. Good grief! That's an awful lot of posts for someone bringing so little to the table. And the month's not over yet...  Signaturebp Proud Member of the Human O-Ring Society Since 2003 >> Well, it's nice to see that since 6/25/04, a total of 10 threads on >> which LaDonna Wyss was the last poster have been completely ignored. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >23 per day. Good grief! That's an awful lot of posts for someone >bringing so little to the table. And the month's not over yet... ...Check out the totals, tho: This Month --------------------------------------- 694 dinehnm@KILLALLSPAMMERSyahoo.com 684 om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research_facility.org 645 hpywife927@yahoo.com 319 flanner@daktel.com 162 herbschaltegger@spamtrap.invalid 158 derekl1963@nospamyahoo.com 131 tdadamemd-spamblock-@excite.com 110 silber@mitre.org 108 dvandorn@NOSPAM.mn.rr.com 97 geracen@iinet.net.au ...I'm in *second* place? I must be slipping :-( Totals ---------------------------------------- 7063 flanner@daktel.com 6046 henry@spsystems.net 4008 om@RE_MOVE_THIS.ccsi.com 3035 om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research_facility.org 2910 om@CT_is_a_troll_AND_a_putz.too 2186 mooregr@greenms.com 2174 justinwigg@yahoo.com 2112 dvandorn@mn.rr.com 2095 beady@mindspring.com 1885 surfren@bigpond.net.au ...Pat beats Henry, but then again if you tally up all three of those addresses that are mine, I beat *everyone*. ...The odd one is that David Sander's still in 10th place, even though he hasn't posted jack sh.t these past few months :-P OM Signature"No bastard ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb bastard die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr >...Check out the totals, tho: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >---------------------------------------- >7063 flanner@daktel.com Someone may be right, I apparently do have a lot of time on my hands- but I only monitor sci.space.history and .moderated; and I try to read all new postings to them. >...Pat beats Henry, but then again if you tally up all three of those >addresses that are mine, I beat *everyone*. Probably with a stick. :-) >...The odd one is that David Sander's still in 10th place, even though >he hasn't posted jack sh.t these past few months :-P I think he's still busy on trying to undo the damage the hard drive failure caused, as well as working on sewing up the distribution rights for Man Conquers Space- I never got on the Google group for MCS, but occasionally I get some email echoed to me about what's going on with it. Pat > ...I'm in *second* place? I must be slipping :-( I had that much free time? My efficiency rating is approaching 100%. >I had that much free time? My efficiency rating is approaching 100%. please supply a verifable reference to that? It might be 100% inefficent...... HAVE A GREAT DAY! > >I had that much free time? My efficiency rating is approaching 100%. > > please supply a verifable reference to that? > > It might be 100% inefficent...... > HAVE A GREAT DAY! LMAO, Bob! Too bad you don't post more often. :-) LaDonna >LMAO, Bob! Too bad you don't post more often. :-) >LaDonna way too busy presently, although I do lurk a bit. the rental home is complete, just trying to rent it presently. now my wife wants our place fixed up. must of sunk $10,000 in the rental wife jealous:( HAVE A GREAT DAY! > > >I had that much free time? My efficiency rating is approaching 100%. > > > > please supply a verifable reference to that? OK: > I had that much free time? My efficiency rating is approaching 100%. There you go, a *verifiable* reference to that. > LMAO, Bob! Too bad you don't post more often. :-) Yeah, I guess you would like someone more suitable to filling copiers with paper than building rockets. > Shows her to have made 645 posts this month. That's an average of over > 23 per day. Good grief! That's an awful lot of posts for someone > bringing so little to the table. And the month's not over yet... And yet she's just too busy to do even basic research on how the Internet works, or the difference between Google and sci.space.history, or even the names and jurisdictions of the law enforcement personnel she spoke to about Apollo 1. You'd think that, if the question bothered her so much, she'd go ahead and answer it and save all that future time reading it. >BTW: Has anyone made the interesting connection between her former >username (hpywife516) and Scott Grissom's May 16th birthdate? ...Considering the offensive bitch just changed her account to hpywife927, I wonder what poor schlub was born on September 27th that she now is obsessed with? OM Signature"No bastard ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb bastard die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr > >BTW: Has anyone made the interesting connection between her former > >username (hpywife516) and Scott Grissom's May 16th birthdate? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > OM Gee, I don't know. You're such an "intelligent" person; you figure it out. :-) LaDonna OM wrote: > ...Considering the offensive bitch just changed her account to > hpywife927, I wonder what poor schlub was born on September 27th that > she now is obsessed with? Well, I'm actually thinking 9/27 is the date she had that "far from insignificant and not all that brief" encounter with Jim Lovell that so fond of discussing! ;-) OM wrote: > ...Considering the offensive bitch just changed her account to > hpywife927, As a matter of fact, she's been ALL of the following: LaDonna Wyss L.D. Wyss Justquest Hpywife 927 Wanttruth Hpywife 516 L.D. Kansas Rae Kansas Whew! That's quite a list to have amassed in only a year or so!!!! And those are only the ones I know about! Perhaps we should add Dissociative Identity Disorder (aka Multiple Personality Disorder) to her growing list of mental woes? ;-) Bruce Palmer wrote: > Shows her to have made 645 posts this month. That's an average of over > 23 per day. Good grief! That's an awful lot of posts for someone bringing so little to the table. And the month's not over yet... The key point, Bruce, is that she's quickly running out of options. She's been exposed for who she really is and what she has truly done. As a result, she's getting blown off left and right. Her list of allies has dwindled to the point where pretty much the only supporter she has left is herself. Yes, her average number of posts this month may be 23 per day. And you are correct in saying that she brings almost nothing to the table in those posts. But, the key is that most of her current conversations are monologues! People are simply not responding to her directly anymore. Why? Because she is not worth their time. If we continue the crusade to ignore her and not post anything in direct response to her lunatical ravings, she has no audience. If we continue to post about topics other than LaDonna's Soap Opera existence, then she will eventually be drowned out. Scott Hedrick wrote: > They're *your* posts. I'm glad someone else picked up on her ridiculous comment about never having been spammed. Of course, SHE hasn't been spammed. SHE doesn't have to worry about getting spammed. SHE is the one who has a fondness for spamming others, not the other way around! Unless, of course, she gets so freaking desperate that she starts a routine of self-spamming! Whoa! I don't even want to think about that. That is just too NASTY, even for this newsgroup!!!!!! Speaking of spam: an attempt was made last night to spam my yahoo account. Gee, I wonder where that wonderful package came from! In any case, it was promptly delivered to my bulk mailbox, which I then flushed until it was empty. And speaking of flushing..... it's really too bad there isn't some kind of instant internet laxative. You know, apply one small dose to the newsgroup and voila! LaDonna Wyss would be flushed out of our system like Ex Lax flushes an impacted turd from a colon. Ah, well. Maybe someday someone will invent such a godsend and make a million. Until then, I guess we'll just have to continue ignoring her and the temporary intestinal cramping she is causing on ssh! Just remember people.... this too shall pass! OM wrote: > ...Hmmm. This hints that "Rae" may be her middle name, then. LaDonna > Rae Wyss. That gives us some more data from which to possibly pull up > personal records and find out more about her psychotic past. You do realize that she will see your desire to get more data on her as infatuation on your part! ;-P Better draw your curtains, double lock your doors, get a block for your phone, and cover your gonads, Mosley. The Happy/Hippy Hooker/Wife may just decide to pack up her jalopy and make another move.... this time, from Houston to Austin.... in the hopes that you will become the man of her dreams. I'm sure both Grissom and Lovell will be eternally grateful to you for taking their place!!! ;-) OM wrote: > ...Interesting. This need to use my last name instead of the "OM" that > everyone else refers to me strikes me as odd. Why would that be odd? It's the name that LaDonna has typically called you whenever she has referenced you in her posts. I'm merely using the same name that has appeared in countless posts over the past few days. If you would prefer being called by OM (or something else, for that matter), all you need to do is speak up, just like Pat did. I now know not to mention you know who when responding to his posts, even though the post was about you know who in the first place! ;-) OM wrote: > ...Oh, Pat won't killfile me over this. Obviously, that's true *OM*. According to one of the posts I saw recently, Pat is thoroughly absorbed in fantasizing about Sophia Loren's jugs in olive oil! He won't even know you posted one word about LaGoner. > ...Yeah, well, the regulars call me OM even though most of them know > my real name, Okay... OM it is. Bruce Palmer wrote: > http://www.ossgmn.com/ladonna.jpg Geez, Bruce. You were kind. You posted a photo of her GOOD side! ;-) Note the outstretched hand.... always on the prowl for a handout! I guess, since Ms. Wyss says she knows how to apply various Tricks of the Trade, she'll have options if her documentary crashes and burns. She could start her own porno site: www.LaDonna'sTricks.com I'm sure it will feature lots of fictional writing (since that seems to be her specialty), and photos of her playing with life size blow up dolls of Borman, Lovell, Scott, et al. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.