Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space History / April 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

NASA Faking a "Moon Landing." No, seriously

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TVDad Jim - 21 Apr 2004 21:44 GMT
It's not *that* kind of a question:

I'm talking about simulations -- did NASA ever fly LM interior mockups
in the Vomit Comet when training astronauts to land on the Moon? I was
wondering if any sims were done so that astronauts could feel their
orientation within the LM from when "up" and "down" started having
meaning during descent.

Was that ever tried with crews, or did they just play it out in the
terrestrial sims and hope that there wouldn't be any disorientation
during landing?
Jay Windley - 21 Apr 2004 23:12 GMT
| Was that ever tried with crews, or did they just play it out in the
| terrestrial sims and hope that there wouldn't be any disorientation
| during landing?

No interior mockups were ever flown in the Vomit Comet, although the plane
was used to simulate 1/6 G for locomotion, etc.

Keep in mind that these guys were test pilots.  They were used to ignoring
their gut and flying the needles.  They were expected to stay proficient in
high-performance aircraft, which do a far better job of twisting one's
innards than any putting about above the moon.

Signature

                                         |
The universe is not required to conform   |  Jay Windley
to the expectations of the ignorant.      |  webmaster @ clavius.org

Greg D. Moore (Strider) - 21 Apr 2004 23:42 GMT
> | Was that ever tried with crews, or did they just play it out in the
> | terrestrial sims and hope that there wouldn't be any disorientation
> | during landing?
>
> No interior mockups were ever flown in the Vomit Comet, although the plane
> was used to simulate 1/6 G for locomotion, etc.

Well, not for the Apollo missions, but for Apollo 13 movie they did. :-)

> Keep in mind that these guys were test pilots.  They were used to ignoring
> their gut and flying the needles.  They were expected to stay proficient in
> high-performance aircraft, which do a far better job of twisting one's
> innards than any putting about above the moon.
TVDad Jim - 22 Apr 2004 06:13 GMT
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" <mooregr_deleteth1s@greenms.com> wrote in message news:<PNChc.104508$e17.97649@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...

> Well, not for the Apollo missions, but for Apollo 13 movie they did. :-)

Was there ever a Garn count released for the Apollo 13 cast?

(just wondering if Kevin Bacon could hold down his porridge after
"scene 42, take 9")
Dave Kenworthy - 22 Apr 2004 00:15 GMT
> It's not *that* kind of a question:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> terrestrial sims and hope that there wouldn't be any disorientation
> during landing?

CM and LM bits and pieces were flown this way  - hatches, docking tunnel,
etc - see http://www.astronautix.com/craft/lmstural.htm  and similar.

The only LM interior in a KC-135 which springs to mind was the one in which
the Hanks/Bacon/Paxton crew trained (and flew their mission!).

Signature

Dave Kenworthy
-----------------------------
Changes aren't permanent - but change is!

Doug... - 22 Apr 2004 02:51 GMT
> > It's not *that* kind of a question:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> The only LM interior in a KC-135 which springs to mind was the one in which
> the Hanks/Bacon/Paxton crew trained (and flew their mission!).

Well... not exactly.  The Vomit Comet was set up with more than just a
LM hatch, it was set up with the LM forward hatch and a realistic
simulation of the control panel, mid-step (the "floor" of the
cylindrical forward LM cabin), and ascent engine cover.  This set-up was
flown on 1/6 G parabolas and, in the 45 seconds or so of 1/6 G afforded
by the parabolas, LM crews practiced getting down on their stomachs and
backing out the hatch.  I've seen references to these 1/6 G flights for
each lunar landing crew, including the Apollo 17 crew, so they never got
to the point where they thought the prior crews' experience was enough
to assure them that any guy they sent up would have no problems exiting
the LM.

They had to put together a LM interior simulator that would mimic the
cramped quarters in which the LM crews would actually exit their
vehicle, since that was probably the most difficult and physically
demanding thing Apollo crews did while in hard suits.  You had to learn
by doing the trick of getting down on your knees, then flat on your
stomach, flattening your back so that the PLSS would clear the "purse"
hangers (the attachments for the temporary stowage bags with which the
LM was launched) and the hatch itself.  In training, the crews found
that it took a trick of placing your faceplate almost directly on the
floor of the cabin and kicking your legs back through the hatch in order
to line up properly.  Such a thing needed to be physically practiced in
1/6 G to ensure successful egress.

Doug
dvandorn@NOSPAM.mn.rr.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.