
Signature
Hop David
http://clowder.net/hop/index.html
<snip>
> A possible format for the G-Prize or X-Prize: Have a series of tasks in
> a vacuum that the contestants would try to accomplish in a certain time
> limit. The first task eliminates a good fraction of the contestants as
> in _American Idol_. Each step of the contest could be televised. It
> could be an entertaining show.
Having the first round of _American Idol_ (or its UK equivalents) conducted
in a vacuum would be a wonderful idea, and would eliminate a nice number of
contestants.

Signature
Dave Kenworthy
-----------------------------
Changes aren't permanent - but change is!
Neil Gerace - 28 Feb 2004 01:46 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> in a vacuum would be a wonderful idea, and would eliminate a nice number of
> contestants.
"That's a very very good idea!"
-- Dr Hook, _Cover of the Rolling Stone_
We could call it "Non-Survivor".
Hop David - 28 Feb 2004 04:19 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> in a vacuum would be a wonderful idea, and would eliminate a nice number of
> contestants.
Well yes, I agree.
I asked my daughter her opinion of an H-prize show. She informed me that
what _I_ thought was entertaining was unlikely to have mass appeal.
She did note that there are some nerdy reality shows on TLC that seem to
be making money.

Signature
Hop David
http://clowder.net/hop/index.html
Rick DeNatale - 28 Feb 2004 23:42 GMT
> Having the first round of _American Idol_ (or its UK equivalents) conducted
> in a vacuum would be a wonderful idea, and would eliminate a nice number of
> contestants.
Two points
1) Isn't American Idol another rip-off of a British Show rather than the
other way around?
2) The early rounds of American Idol are a hoot. And this year, they
produced a star in the form of "She bangs!" Hung.
Dave Kenworthy - 29 Feb 2004 00:00 GMT
> 1) Isn't American Idol another rip-off of a British Show rather than the
> other way around?
AFAIK it's the US version of 'Pop Idol'...

Signature
Dave Kenworthy
-----------------------------
Changes aren't permanent - but change is!
OM - 29 Feb 2004 08:25 GMT
>AFAIK it's the US version of 'Pop Idol'...
...Ah, so we *can* blame those limey bastards for this one after all.
OM

Signature
"No bastard ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb bastard die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society
- General George S. Patton, Jr
Neil Gerace - 29 Feb 2004 15:11 GMT
> >AFAIK it's the US version of 'Pop Idol'...
>
> ...Ah, so we *can* blame those limey bastards for this one after all.
It's just a karaoke comp, didn't you have them in bars all over America
already?
Andrew Gray - 29 Feb 2004 00:20 GMT
>> Having the first round of _American Idol_ (or its UK equivalents) conducted
>> in a vacuum would be a wonderful idea, and would eliminate a nice number of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> 1) Isn't American Idol another rip-off of a British Show rather than the
> other way around?
Look, we're sorry. We'll try and make amends. Honest.
> 2) The early rounds of American Idol are a hoot. And this year, they
> produced a star in the form of "She bangs!" Hung.
I was unable to take these things seriously. Then this happened:
http://www.dsu.org.uk/freshers/ball/drspod.php
The realisation that many intelligent people, accepted to a prestigious
and respected university, were getting excited at the prospect of seeing
someone who'd made an idiot of himself on television perform... well, it
was scary...
(I did like his theory that someone with a PhD winning it would be
interesting, though...)

Signature
-Andrew Gray
shimgray@bigfoot.com