Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space Flight / August 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

space without a suit

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mike7411@gmail.com - 12 Aug 2006 22:57 GMT
I was told that if you venture into space without a suit, you will
essentially explode due to lack of pressure.

Out of curiosity, is this true?

Thank you.
John A. Weeks III - 13 Aug 2006 03:49 GMT
> I was told that if you venture into space without a suit, you will
> essentially explode due to lack of pressure.
>
> Out of curiosity, is this true?

Check out the scene in 2001 when the astronaut Dave moves from
the pod to the spacecraft without his helmet.  I have been told
that this scene is pretty accurate, except that Dave probably
would not have wanted to take a deep breath before making the
transfer.

Rather than exploding, it is more likely your skin would start
to boil.  With the low pressure, the water in your skin would
start to vaporize.

-john-

Signature

======================================================================
John A. Weeks III           952-432-2708            john@johnweeks.com
Newave Communications                         http://www.johnweeks.com
======================================================================

Andrew Plotkin - 13 Aug 2006 05:48 GMT
> I was told that if you venture into space without a suit, you will
> essentially explode due to lack of pressure.
>
> Out of curiosity, is this true?

No.

--Z

Signature

"And Aholibamah bare Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah: these were the borogoves..."
*
If the Bush administration hasn't shipped you to Syria for interrogation, it's
for one reason: they don't feel like it. Not because you're innocent.

delt0r - 13 Aug 2006 08:16 GMT
I though this as well. It turns out this is wrong. If you google these
groups you will find a lot of info. Also the NASA web site has a FAQ
somewhere that includes this question.

Greg

> I was told that if you venture into space without a suit, you will
> essentially explode due to lack of pressure.
>
> Out of curiosity, is this true?
>
> Thank you.
Doug Devers - 13 Aug 2006 18:47 GMT
>I was told that if you venture into space without a suit, you will
> essentially explode due to lack of pressure.
>
> Out of curiosity, is this true?

No.  You'd die pretty quickly, and you might bloat a bit, but you would
remain essentially intact.
Check out:  http://www.sff.net/people/Geoffrey.Landis/vacuum.html

dgd
Joe Strout - 13 Aug 2006 19:51 GMT
> I was told that if you venture into space without a suit, you will
> essentially explode due to lack of pressure.
>
> Out of curiosity, is this true?

No.  Search the archives for details; it's been discussed many times.

Best,
- Joe
Audi - 14 Aug 2006 00:51 GMT
As far as I am aware, the vaccuum of space has one atom per cubic metre  so
your body would be frozen fairly quickly in -268 degree Celsius void of
space... but I cannot confirm this fact off the top of my head. I also
suspect that exposed skin would be fried by the solar radiation and winds
that the ozone layer currently protects us from feeling on a daily basis.

I believe the "explosion" you are referring to would be what happens in
theory as the gases expand in our blood vessels, although whether a person
would "blow up" or freeze into a solid object of ice to be captured by a
gravitaional body and serve as a human popsicle satellite for eternity
remains a question I do not know the answer to.

I therefore offer my uneducated opinion that a man without a space suit
would asphyxiate rather quickly without oxygen, the gases in the body would
produce tremendous pain as they try to escape from the body without
atmospheric pressure, and the exposed flesh would simultaneously turn dark
from solar winds whilst becoming solidified as our atoms and molecules slow
down and stop moving for eternity.

Not all that pleasant I would imagine.

> I was told that if you venture into space without a suit, you will
> essentially explode due to lack of pressure.
>
> Out of curiosity, is this true?
>
> Thank you.
John Thingstad - 19 Aug 2006 06:57 GMT
> As far as I am aware, the vaccuum of space has one atom per cubic metre  
> so
> your body would be frozen fairly quickly in -268 degree Celsius void of
> space... but I cannot confirm this fact off the top of my head. I also
> suspect that exposed skin would be fried by the solar radiation and winds
> that the ozone layer currently protects us from feeling on a daily basis.

Cold is a relative thing.
There is nothing to conduct the heat so the only way to loose heat is  
through radiation.
It's more like a thermos really. Vacuum is a excellent insulator.
In spacecraft the real challenge is to loose heat.
Not a problem.

Solar radiation is not a problem.
By the time it takes effect you would be long dead.
It's not that different from radiation sickness.
It takes hours to take effect.
More like a sunburn except that it penetrates the entire body not just the  
skin.

If you don't breathe out your lungs can burst.
Now that's painful. Also you eardrums might burst.
Also vessels in you nose might burst.
Apart that the loss of pressure gives you the worst case of the bends ever.
Judging from experience with divers it should take about 3 minutes to take  
effect.
By then you should already start loosing consciousness from asphyxiation.
This is what would probably kill you.

So if they can get you inside within 3 minutes you should have a chance.

Signature

Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Cray74@gmail.com - 14 Aug 2006 01:09 GMT
> I was told that if you venture into space without a suit, you will
> essentially explode due to lack of pressure.

http://www.sff.net/people/Geoffrey.Landis/vacuum.html

There have been several examples of vacuum exposure. The answer is: no,
you won't explode, but you will die. From examination of diving
decompression injuries, you might rupture your lungs, but the damage
would be internal (comparable to a badly done emergency surfacing from
30ft to the surface, a 1-bar pressure change.)

Mike Miller
Claude - 14 Aug 2006 02:34 GMT
> I was told that if you venture into space without a suit, you will
> essentially explode due to lack of pressure.
>
> Out of curiosity, is this true?
>
> Thank you.

Depends on how fast the leak in your suit is.

Signature

Linux is just a fancy name for Windows blocker.

Claude Hopper

Jan Vorbrüggen - 14 Aug 2006 08:13 GMT
> I was told that if you venture into space without a suit, you will
> essentially explode due to lack of pressure.
>
> Out of curiosity, is this true?

No.

    Jan
Mike Combs - 15 Aug 2006 19:52 GMT
>I was told that if you venture into space without a suit, you will
> essentially explode due to lack of pressure.
>
> Out of curiosity, is this true?

The people who told you that know it's true because they saw it in a movie.

But in truth, no, you wouldn't explode.  One would have about 15 seconds of
consciousness.  Then in about 60 seconds one would be dead.  But one
wouldn't explode.

Arthur C. Clarke got so tired of this misconception that he saw to it "2001"
included a scene of an astronaut briefly exposed to vacuum.  But many movies
made well after "2001" continued to portray this inaccurately.

Signature

Regards,
Mike Combs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By all that you hold dear on this good Earth
I bid you stand, Men of the West!
                                                    Aragorn

David - 20 Aug 2006 00:25 GMT
>>I was told that if you venture into space without a suit, you will
>>essentially explode due to lack of pressure.
>>
>>Out of curiosity, is this true?
>
> The people who told you that know it's true because they saw it in a movie.

Actually, if you hold your breath while decompressing to vacuum, your
lungs may just explode (or do something very similar). But agreed, your
whole body won't go *pop* like in the movies ;) .

Signature

David

waltbj01@mindspring.com - 23 Aug 2006 21:33 GMT
First, you would start losing water - because at 63,000 feet pressure
altitude water boils at about 98.6F, hence people have to wear pressure
suits to prevent that from happening. Actually because of the reduced
efficiency of the oxygen-CO2 exchange in the lungs the USAF mandates
pressure suits be worn for flight above 50,000. Pressure breathing -
higher pressure oxygen rammed into you via a tight-fitting mask does
work up to aboput 55,000 but it's dangerous as it hikes your blood
pressure. It's also damn unconfortable and you have to forcibly exhale
after each breath. Second, with additional oxygen you will pass out in
about 9 seconds above about 45000 equivalent ambient pressure because
the blood coming from the lungs to the brain will have insufficent
oxygen available.Since the brain cannot store oxygen, out you go. It's
been filmed many a time in altitude chambers and every high-altitude
pilot gets to watch one of these films every three years or so. BTW I
used to teach this along with supervising (and doing) pressure suit
flight in the USAF. As for holding your breath - as little as 4 1/2 psi
overpressure in your lungs can rupture them. I know of a case where a
novice diver surfaced from around 10 feet down still holding a breath
of air from his tank - killed him. Okinawa, around 1955.
Walt BJ
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.