Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space Flight / March 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Space Energy

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ramiga - 30 Jan 2006 13:12 GMT
Why can't we scoop energy from space into our crafts to provide
propulsion. Space is full of energy!!!

Why do we have to use power plants designed on Earth?

It is apparent to me that for the safety of the piloted craft, we wrap
the craft in a force field and protect the astronauts, thus we have to
carry our fuel in some form on board the craft for these missions.

The same way we take  solar energy out of the air, we can take space
energy out of the air.  We are stuck on power generation instead of
using the available power in our various environments.

We need to think of a method of capturing all that energy in space to
fuel our craft, not just solar.

Any ideas?

peace, mmgr
no manmade nukes in space
Len Lekx - 02 Feb 2006 14:31 GMT
>It is apparent to me that for the safety of the piloted craft, we wrap
>the craft in a force field and protect the astronauts, thus we have to
>carry our fuel in some form on board the craft for these missions.

  Just FYI...

     "Star Trek" is *fiction*.  ;-)

  We don't HAVE (yet...) inertial-dampeners, zero-point generators,
or impulse drives.

  If they're developed in the future, that's great... but for RIGHT
NOW, we have to make do with what we have.
Mike Swift - 03 Feb 2006 01:48 GMT
> Why can't we scoop energy from space into our crafts to provide
> propulsion. Space is full of energy!!!
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> peace, mmgr
> no manmade nukes in space

Im afraid you watch too much television. Try spending time reading some
books on physics, math, and chemistry. Then people here will be more
able to answer your informed questions.

Signature

Mike Swift

Two things only the people anxiously desire, bread and circuses.

                                     Decimus Junius Juvenalls

Cray74@gmail.com - 03 Feb 2006 02:21 GMT
> Why can't we scoop energy from space into our crafts to provide
> propulsion. Space is full of energy!!!

..Where is all this energy?

> We need to think of a method of capturing all that energy in space to
> fuel our craft, not just solar.

What other energy is there in space? After sunlight/starlight, there's
no energy of any significance (unless you want to play games with
trading motion of a spacecraft for power in a planetary magnetic field,
which is just another way of getting energy out of the spaceship's fuel
tank.)

Unless you can name this other mysterious space energy, you've got
solar, and solar is limited.

In Earth orbit, space stations need huge, clumsy solar panels to
deliver a few score kilowatts. A nuclear reactor totalling a few tons
can deliver as much power without the many problems of solar power.

Beyond Earth orbit, solar energy disappears pretty quickly. Twice as
far from Earth - not even to the asteroid belt - and solar energy is
only 1/4th as intense as it is at Earth orbit. By Jupiter's orbit,
solar energy is 1/25th as intense as Earth orbit, which means you need
acres of solar panels to get anything approaching the power of a small
nuclear power plant. By Saturn's orbit, solar energy is 1/100th as
intense as Earth orbit. It's downhill from there.

> It is apparent to me that for the safety of the piloted craft, we wrap
> the craft in a force field and protect the astronauts, thus we have to
> carry our fuel in some form on board the craft for these missions.

Maybe you could point me to these "force fields" you're talking about.
What are they, and who makes them?

> The same way we take  solar energy out of the air, we can take space
> energy out of the air.  We are stuck on power generation instead of
> using the available power in our various environments.

Have you actually looked at how hard it is to get energy out of the
space environment? An RTG with about 30lbs of plutonium (and a few
hundred pounds of armor) can deliver hundreds of watts year in, year
out for decades. An RTG might not be worth the lawsuits in Earth orbit,
but in the outer solar system, it's a helluva lot better than an equal
mass of solar panels.

Mike Miller
Ten Quidado - 04 Feb 2006 01:53 GMT
> > Why can't we scoop energy from space into our crafts to provide
> > propulsion. Space is full of energy!!!

At this point it becomes clear that ramiga is an intentional troll, possibly
Elfnutz or Guth yanking your chains.  Ignore it and it will go away.
James Nicoll - 04 Feb 2006 15:30 GMT
>> Why can't we scoop energy from space into our crafts to provide
>> propulsion. Space is full of energy!!!
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>which is just another way of getting energy out of the spaceship's fuel
>tank.)

    Don't forget gravity, which can be exploited with fly bys and
Oberth manuevers.

Signature

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/
http://www.livejournal.com/users/james_nicoll

David McMillan - 08 Feb 2006 14:56 GMT
>>What other energy is there in space? After sunlight/starlight, there's
>>no energy of any significance (unless you want to play games with
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>     Don't forget gravity, which can be exploited with fly bys and
> Oberth manuevers.

    Bbbbut!  That energy isn't free!  You STEAL IT from the PLANETS!
Why, the Voyager slingshots past Jupiter ROBBED that planet of nearly
1 bajillionth of its orbital speed!  If we keep doing this, we will
PERMANENTLY ALTER the natural arrangement of the ENTIRE SOLAR
SYSTEM!!!!!!!!!

    (sorry.  I just had to channel my inner lunatic-fringe envirowhacko.
 I'll try not to let it happen again.)  :)
James Nicoll - 10 Feb 2006 16:26 GMT
>>>What other energy is there in space? After sunlight/starlight, there's
>>>no energy of any significance (unless you want to play games with
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>    (sorry.  I just had to channel my inner lunatic-fringe envirowhacko.
>  I'll try not to let it happen again.)  :)

    You jest but in fact, I have seen at least one person object
to our reckless alteration of planetary orbits. Really.

Signature

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/
http://www.livejournal.com/users/james_nicoll

Mike Combs - 13 Feb 2006 18:53 GMT
> You jest but in fact, I have seen at least one person object
> to our reckless alteration of planetary orbits. Really.

Your story reminds me of one guy who told me I was an idiot to propose
mining asteroids in the Main Belt.  He was convinced the Belt was the only
thing offering protection to the inner solar system from asteroidal
bombardment.  I asked him to take a look at the moon with a pair of
binoculars to judge to what extent the inner system has been protected from
bombardment.

Signature

Regards,
Mike Combs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By all that you hold dear on this good Earth
I bid you stand, Men of the West!
                                                    Aragorn

David McMillan - 15 Mar 2006 20:41 GMT
>>You jest but in fact, I have seen at least one person object
>>to our reckless alteration of planetary orbits. Really.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> binoculars to judge to what extent the inner system has been protected from
> bombardment.

    Heck, several years ago there was an individual who posted an email
to the main Artemis Society listserv expressing his concerns that
their plan would destabilize Luna's orbit and send it crashing into
the Earth, 'all in the name of commercialism.'  The worst part was,
judging from his proper spelling, grammar, punctuation, and general
use of langauge, this was not some uneducated crackpot, but someone
with a decent education and general level of intelligence.  He wasn't
raving, either, just stating a concern that *he* seemed to take very
seriously indeed, regardless of how pathetically inane it would strike
anyone with even basic knowledge of the physics involved.
    Perhaps even more regrettable was the fact that at least a few list
members allegedly proceeded to respond to him off-list in what
amounted to "j00 fr34k1n6 m0r0n" style.
Mike Combs - 25 Mar 2006 10:53 GMT
> Heck, several years ago there was an individual who posted an email
> to the main Artemis Society listserv expressing his concerns that
> their plan would destabilize Luna's orbit and send it crashing into
> the Earth, 'all in the name of commercialism.'

Heh.  I had a friend who (facetiously, I'm sure), said he was concerned that
we'd look up at the moon and go, "Quarter moon?  I thought it was supposed
to be a half moon tonight!"

Signature

Regards,
Mike Combs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By all that you hold dear on this good Earth
I bid you stand, Men of the West!
                                                    Aragorn

Rick Jones - 13 Feb 2006 19:17 GMT
>     You jest but in fact, I have seen at least one person object
> to our reckless alteration of planetary orbits. Really.

And in years hence we'll have to be sure we kee out starships below
warp-factor N to avoid damaging the fabric of space in sensitive areas
:)

rick jones
Signature

The computing industry isn't as much a game of "Follow The Leader" as
it is one of "Ring Around the Rosy" or perhaps "Duck Duck Goose."
                                                   - Rick Jones
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.