Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space Flight / October 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Back to the moon, only CEV reuseable?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Philip - 22 Sep 2005 02:33 GMT
Looking at the planned vehicles for the return to the moon, the
article(s) seemed to emphasize leverage of shuttle technology. For
example the use of SSMEs and SSRBs. However, only the CEV was described
as reusable.

Will the new systems also recover and reuse the boosters? If not, seems
like a waste of a good SSME which are supposed to be good for many firings.
Mike Combs - 27 Sep 2005 18:50 GMT
> Will the new systems also recover and reuse the boosters? If not, seems
> like a waste of a good SSME which are supposed to be good for many firings.

The SRBs should be retrievable/reusable same as today, but I'm interested in
hearing about that 5 SSME cluster.  Are we getting into disposable SSMEs
now?  I thought they were way too complicated for that.

Signature

Regards,
Mike Combs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Member of the National Non-sequitur Society.  We may not make
much sense, but we do like pizza.

Jeff Findley - 03 Oct 2005 23:02 GMT
> > Will the new systems also recover and reuse the boosters? If not, seems
> > like a waste of a good SSME which are supposed to be good for many
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> hearing about that 5 SSME cluster.  Are we getting into disposable SSMEs
> now?  I thought they were way too complicated for that.

Complicated isn't the issue.  Expense would be.  But at the low predicted
flight rate of the stick and the SDHLV, I doubt NASA would want to spend the
money to make them recoverable.  This new proposal shows that NASA still
doesn't care much about how much launch costs will dominate the program in
years to come.

Jeff
Signature

Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address.

blade_pride - 10 Oct 2005 21:05 GMT
I am not sure how many SSME's have been made for shuttle uses, but
maybe there just going to use what SSMEs that have in stock to get the
new CEV of the ground and them change to a non-reuseable SSME class
engine.

After all once the shuttle is gone there will still be some good SSME
engines left that can be used for something.
carsten_niel@hotmail.com - 23 Oct 2005 16:05 GMT
Is it Block 1 SSMEs they will use ?

They use Block 2 on the Shuttle now.

Regards

Carsten Nielsen
Denmark
Heinrich Zinndorf-Linker (zili@home) - 26 Oct 2005 21:50 GMT
Am 23 Oct 2005 08:05:46 -0700 schrieb "carsten_niel@hotmail.com":

>Is it Block 1 SSMEs they will use ?
>They use Block 2 on the Shuttle now.

I guess, they will use the most modern ones (block-2) on all manned
CEV launches - they _might_ use older ones only on unmanned cargo or
development flights.

cu, ZiLi aka HKZL  (Heinrich Zinndorf-Linker)
Signature

"Abusus non tollit usum" - Latin: Abuse is no argument against proper use.

mailto: heinrich@zili.de   http://zili.de

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.