Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space Flight / September 2003



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Stationkeeping Fuel at L1

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TangoMan - 14 Sep 2003 05:04 GMT
I need help in calculating the gravitational drift at L1, 30,000+ km above
lunar near side.

I'm curious how much stationkeeping fuel, per period of time, a SPS located
there would require, per ton of SPS mass, with an ISP of 369. Something like
a reboost for 20 seconds duration, every 30 days, for every 10 tons of SPS.

For the simplicity sake I'm assuming NEO derived Methane with minimal
processing in orbit, and lunar derived LOX.

I'm trying to avoid the deep cryogenic temperature of LH2, and the extensive
orbital refining that'll be required for UDMH, hydrazine, nitric acid, and
other hypergolics.

I realize solar electric ion would make a lot of sense, but getting the gas
will involve Earth launch and I'm already assuming some NEO volitile
traffic, so getting the Methane isn't a sole purpose mission.

I've considered lunar derived aluminum and LOX but I'm not too confident in
the performance of this combination.

I'm also avoiding silane because I"m looking to have as simple an
infrastructure dedicated to fuel production. The LOX is produced through the
ilmenite reduction process. Hopefully, raw methane from NEO, with minimal
processing, does the trick.

Lastly, I don't know enough about a lunar sulphur and LOX combination, so
I've excluded it from consideration at this time.

Can anyone help with some realistic numbers?

TangoMan
Ian Stirling - 14 Sep 2003 23:59 GMT
> I need help in calculating the gravitational drift at L1, 30,000+ km above
> lunar near side.
<snip>
> Can anyone help with some realistic numbers?

What about solar sailing?
Add a few panels that pop in and out of the light, and use them to modulate
the overall photon thrust.
Stick it a bit sunwards of L1, and problem solved?

Signature

http://inquisitor.i.am/    |  mailto:inquisitor@i.am |             Ian Stirling.
---------------------------+-------------------------+--------------------------
The fight between good and evil, an epic battle. Darth vader and Luke,
suddenly in the middle of the fight, Darth pulls Luke to him, and whispers
"I know what you'r getting for christmas!" Luke exclaims "But how ??!?"
"It's true Luke, I know what you'r getting for christmas" Luke tries to ignore
this, but wrenches himself free, yelling "How could you know this?",
Vader replies "I felt your presents"  -- The Chris Evans breakfast show ca. 94

Henry Spencer - 16 Sep 2003 02:00 GMT
>I'm curious how much stationkeeping fuel, per period of time, a SPS located
>there would require...

Well, the real answer is that nobody knows for sure, because nobody's
tried it.  All our Lagrange-point experience to date has been with the
Sun-Earth points.  The Earth-Moon points are noticeably less stable, due
to strong solar perturbations and the oddities of the Moon's own orbit.

>I realize solar electric ion would make a lot of sense, but getting the gas
>will involve Earth launch and I'm already assuming some NEO volitile
>traffic, so getting the Methane isn't a sole purpose mission.

The flip side of that is that a powersat already has massive amounts of
electric power available, so it's really dumb not to exploit that free
resource to reduce propellant requirements.

Note that electrothermal thrusters, like arcjets, can get rather better
Isp than chemical rockets while being much less cranky about propellant
choice than ion engines.  NEO-derived ammonia would be excellent for them.
Even water could work, depending on the thruster type.
Signature

MOST launched 1015 EDT 30 June, separated 1046,         | Henry Spencer
first ground-station pass 1651, all nominal!            | henry@spsystems.net

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.