Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space Science / December 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Comprehensiveness of Worship in Islam

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David Williams - 29 Nov 2008 04:47 GMT
-> I send you today a good article. It could be new and adds to your
-> knowledge.
 
I curse you to spend the rest of your miserable existence in Las
Vegas, where everything you hold dear is treated with utter contempt.
May the tingling bells of a million slot machines deafen you, the
smoke-laden atmospheres of the casinos choke you, the flashes of
cameras blind you, and the disgusting water poison you.
 
dow (recently returned from Vegas, which didn't appeal to me, either)
Ken S. Tucker - 30 Nov 2008 08:05 GMT
Williams you're going weird.

> -> I send you today a good article. It could be new and adds to your
> -> knowledge.
>
> I curse you to spend the rest of your miserable existence in Las
> Vegas, where everything you hold dear is treated with utter contempt.

We had a lot of good times in Vegas and so have many
of our friends. I certainly understand your contempt for
muslimes, given the complicity they had in the attacks
in Bombay, especially murdering Dr. Moss, but please,
be sane and DO NOT compare that to Vegas.

> May the tingling bells of a million slot machines deafen you, the
> smoke-laden atmospheres of the casinos choke you, the flashes of
> cameras blind you, and the disgusting water poison you.

Well the average canuckistani peasant wouldn't know
what Vegas is about, it's for upscale intelligent adults,
so that certainly will exclude you.

> dow (recently returned from Vegas, which didn't appeal to me, either)

Post your bitch-fest to Alt.Whinny.Canucks, with the
rest of the idiot canucks who have an average IQ of 90,
(80 if you're from Taranto).
Ken
Ralph - 30 Nov 2008 16:48 GMT
Oh, I don't know.
I support any curse Dave can imagine for idiotic, persistant religious
propaganda posted to an astronomy group.
I kind of like the idea of any holier-than-thou group being sent to Vegas,
or if they don't like the 'States, maybe Alberta.
The Canadian education system has taken quite a decline from the past few
governments, but I'm fairly sure it still beats out the majority of
self-centered bigots I've met from south of the border.  I look forward to
hearing what Steven Hawking says on his visit.

Vegas?  is definately for upscale adults that know nothing of probability
and statistics, and flock to flashing lights, waste, and 40 year old
fantasies.
Informed or intelligent?  I think not.
Dave just went up two notches.

> Williams you're going weird.
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> (80 if you're from Taranto).
> Ken
Ken S. Tucker - 30 Nov 2008 23:09 GMT
Hi Ralph.

> Oh, I don't know.
> I support any curse Dave can imagine for idiotic, persistant religious
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> self-centered bigots I've met from south of the border.  I look forward to
> hearing what Steven Hawking says on his visit.

Yeah, I sure hope Steven enjoys himself.

> Vegas?  is definately for upscale adults that know nothing of probability
> and statistics, and flock to flashing lights, waste, and 40 year old
> fantasies.
> Informed or intelligent?  I think not.
> Dave just went up two notches.

I think you and Dave are stereotyping Vegas.
You have lot's of *freedom* on how to spend money,
what more can you ask for?
Ken
Ralph - 01 Dec 2008 23:24 GMT
I look forward to
>> hearing what Steven Hawking says on his visit.
>
> Yeah, I sure hope Steven enjoys himself.

I'm sure Dr. Hawkings acceptance of an office with the Perimeter Institute
will be a change for him,
and he'll continue to amaze, educate, and go his own way, in his own
fashion.  I'm sure he enjoys himself, and from what I've heard and read,
he likes to take chances as well.
I can only believe this was in his plan, and not a sudden whim.
Dr. Hawking is not known for poor planning.
He's been proved wrong on points, but only after many years, and
occasionally, even by himself.

> I think you and Dave are stereotyping Vegas.
> You have lot's of *freedom* on how to spend money,
> what more can you ask for?
> Ken

Of course we're stereo-typing Vegas.  That's what it was built for.
No, the freedom on how to spend money in Vegas is determined only by the
cold, calculating numbers
that confine you to spending it in a fashion where the result overwhelming
goes to waste.

As to what more I could ask for, I am completely stunned by the question.
14 or 15 answers come to mind, and none would make you happy.
A number of years back, I finally learned not to ask questions that I was
certain would produce an answer I wouldn't like.
Most of those questions involved starting the question with "why".
The most telling answer came only recently, when I read a story about "how
things got the way they are at the office" and involved monkeys.

My sister goes to Vegas regularly, and enjoys herself with her husband
immensely.
They don't understand my interests, either.
Ken S. Tucker - 02 Dec 2008 04:12 GMT
>  I look forward to>> hearing what Steven Hawking says on his visit.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> He's been proved wrong on points, but only after many years, and
> occasionally, even by himself.

Steven's ideas are comparatively esoteric, and difficult
to test experimentally, and I being a pragmatic theorist,
we have little overlap, so I confess we really don't know
each other.

>  > I think you and Dave are stereotyping Vegas.
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> immensely.
> They don't understand my interests, either.

That's what's great about America, versatility. You may
enjoy Disneyland, Key West (woohoo), Salt Lake City...
Ken
Ralph - 02 Dec 2008 09:43 GMT
Sorry, Ken, you missed my jist again.
The versatility you describe is feigned, catered, and manufactured.  I have
little interest in that.
The few places I'd wish to see as a tourist in the United States are under
secure lock and key, to the scientific staff only.

The only interest I'd have in visiting the "tourist traps", is if I'd won a
lottery, and my relatives or friends wanted to go.
I'd likely tag along, to see they'd actually enjoy themselves.  I might
admire some of the construction, architecture, or ask for other "weird"
information.
The information I already have of most of these places, second-hand, is
enough for me.
- and if I won the lottery, I would do some travelling.  I have several
destinations in that fantasy.

As to Dr. Hawkings research and ideas being esoteric, I disagree.
The frontiers of cosmology and particle physics are being made in our time,
and have only really developed in the last few decades.
As to the difficulty of experimental data, that's being done as well, and in
a more timely fashion than ever before.
Huge constructions like the SNO, (Sudbury Neutrino Observatory - it's
relatively old) LIGO, (to study gravity waves) the VLA, (seen in the movie
Contact) and the VLT, (the Very Large Telescope - ...no-one ever accused
them of imaginative names) have been built to work on these ideas.
I'm consistantly amazed at how little news gets to the public about all the
research that gets done, the construction it involves, and how the limits of
construction get pushed so that we get the benefits not only from the
research, but the whole process that leads to it,
with the miniscule amount of financial backing the government "gifts" out.

'Course, maybe that's why.  The government can't take the comparison of
money well spent in the gain of knowledge without an agenda.
I likely shouldn't say that - 'without an agenda'.  Science research does
have an agenda; to solve problems like disease, poverty, food production,
construction, and the like.  It gets pushed in other directions by the
funding.  You gotta do what you gotta do to get paid - a sad state of our
times.

> Steven's ideas are comparatively esoteric, and difficult
> to test experimentally, and I being a pragmatic theorist,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> enjoy Disneyland, Key West (woohoo), Salt Lake City...
> Ken
Ken S. Tucker - 19 Dec 2008 15:44 GMT
Hi Ralph, sorry I missed your post.

> Sorry, Ken, you missed my jist again.
> The versatility you describe is feigned, catered, and manufactured.  I have
> little interest in that.
> The few places I'd wish to see as a tourist in the United States are under
> secure lock and key, to the scientific staff only.

Well of course, that keeps the hobo's out.

> The only interest I'd have in visiting the "tourist traps", is if I'd won a
> lottery, and my relatives or friends wanted to go.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> - and if I won the lottery, I would do some travelling.  I have several
> destinations in that fantasy.

Ok, it's reasonably priced, most are free, so if you're
whinning, go there :-).

> As to Dr. Hawkings research and ideas being esoteric, I disagree.
> The frontiers of cosmology and particle physics are being made in our time,
> and have only really developed in the last few decades.

Not really, he and his ilk sell books to the unwashed
masses, via pop-media....it's Bull sh.t, nothing new.

> As to the difficulty of experimental data, that's being done as well, and in
> a more timely fashion than ever before.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> research, but the whole process that leads to it,
> with the miniscule amount of financial backing the government "gifts" out.

I'm ok with the perimeter institute, but govmonks should
get out of the business of theoretical physics, because
they're retarded. It makes all the cows moo together.

> 'Course, maybe that's why.  The government can't take the comparison of
> money well spent in the gain of knowledge without an agenda.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> funding.  You gotta do what you gotta do to get paid - a sad state of our
> times.

Waterloo University was good in the mid-70's but since
then has gone down the tubes, with only immigrant
low quality profs, it's garbage now.

> > Steven's ideas are comparatively esoteric, and difficult
> > to test experimentally, and I being a pragmatic theorist,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> > enjoy Disneyland, Key West (woohoo), Salt Lake City...
> > Ken
Ralph - 19 Dec 2008 21:56 GMT
I see. - nothing but a flame.
Have fun.
Ken S. Tucker - 19 Dec 2008 23:31 GMT
> I see. - nothing but a flame.
> Have fun.

On the contrary I have a great deal of respect for the Perimeter
Institute, and I certainly did NOT "flame" you.
Ken
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.