Space Forum / Space Science / August 2008

I totally agree, that an open what-if mindset is always required, and
the what-if I'm ever remembered at all it'll be centuries after the
fact of this planet having come to its own demise, with the radiation
mutated survivors trying to figure out what the hell was getting
missed way back when practical actions could have saved the day, so to
speak.

This universe and perhaps of its sister or polar opposite BB universe
may in fact go on forever, but interactions within are going to likely
reset the game of life as we know it, as galaxies manage to collide
and as rogue stars, black holes and solar system like planets get
tossed about like so much random buckshot from lose cannons, not to
mention reformulated entirely from scratch.

The comet like tails of our Selene/moon and that of Venus are in fact
likely sources of those kinds of cosmic tough little microbes/spores,
as solar wind thrown our way from one world towards another that
passes directly through a wash or rather dusting of whatever survived
elsewhere.  This notion doesn't exclude those other complex forms of
life sequestered safely within thick ice as having arrived into our
environment, nor have I ever been excluding our local/terrestrial
evolution.

The toasty geothermal and thereby newish/active surface and mostly CO2
and S8 atmosphere of Venus is perhaps too much for the likes of
accommodating our notions of intelligent life, especially in the
buff.  However, with some degree of local evolution and especially
upon utilizing technology is what makes Venus potentially livable for
those of us a little smarter than a hot rock.

Unfortunately, our traditional naysim loaded mindset that's primarily
faith-based and otherwise mainstream taught as though it's the one and
only word of our mostly white God, suggesting that our form of
terrestrial intelligent life is all there is to behold, and that all
else is merely of inert eye-candy that couldn't possibly have
contributed to any form of terrestrial life as we know it, is simply
status quo horsefeathers (aka intellectual flatulence) at best.

-    Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

Of course- a legendary *bad example*.

What will separate Brad from other historical bad examples, like Rasputin,
Benedict Arnold and Al Gore, is that the others, at one time, added value to
the societies they lived in.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

I think you've kept your mind so open that your brains are falling out.
Brad Guth is a net kook, nothing more.

Jeff

I'm not the one and only messenger from hell that's trying to draw
attention to the extremely nearby planet Venus.

Many others have tried and having failed, including the somewhat
recent efforts by John Ackerman ("An Alternate View of Venus") that
reinterpreted much of the best available science pertaining to Venus
and came up with an entirely different analogy that makes the planet
Venus extremely interesting and worth our further exploring.

Instead there’s simply too much ongoing need-to-know and otherwise
layers of taboo/nondisclosure imposed as to anything Venus related, as
though those in charge of our private parts and most of everything
else that matters have something to hide.

-    Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

Wait this reminds me of a movie where a guy gets thrown into the
future and finds society so screwed up that they forget how to grow
food. The guy from the past is declared the world's smartest human
when he teaches them how to actually grow food (corporations had been
supplied processed food for years and no one knew how it was done).

Anywat, THAT society if it ever comes to pass would worship Brad.

And exactly what did Brad discover? Hmmmm?

Why is mainstream astronomy so deathly afraid of allowing the best
available truths to emerge?

Why has religion been the stealth puppet-master of those in charge of
most everything else?

What's so terribly wrong with there being other intelligent life
(possibly wiser than most of us) outside of Earth?

-      Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth