Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space Science / January 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Olber's Paradox? (dow).

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David Williams - 19 Jan 2008 21:01 GMT
-> There's something I find strange about Olber's paradox.
-> Let me lay out a 3D XYZ cartesian grid, with arbitrary
-> units of 1 mile, and at each vertex let there be a person.

-> Now I'll send out a light signal from the origin spreading
-> to all persons, at which time they each begin humming a
-> tune, generating a faint sound. (We'll assume sound
-> is carried by the medium).

-> Now according to Olber, the amplitude of the humming
-> will build indefinitely, in fact to infinity.
-> See the problem, the sound energy generated is every
-> where of finite density, i.e. 1 hummer/cubic mile, yet
-> the sound becomes infinitely dense.
-> Is there something wrong with that?
-> Regards
-> Ken S. Tucker
 
The sound isn't of finite density; the hummers are. Each hummer is
feeding sound energy continuously into the medium, and we are assuming
that the sound never degrades, gets absorbed, etc.. So the intensity of
sound builds up and up, with no limit within the parameters of this
fantasy.
 
If the hummers consist of a sound-absorbing material, then the level
of sound will reach a limit when the rate at which each hummer absorbs
sound equals the rate at which he produces it. This is analogous to the
astronomical Olber's paradox, which does not say that the intensity of
light would be infinite, but that it would equal the mean brightness of
a stellar surface. At that point, each star would absorb as much light
as it produces.
 
                                   dow
Ken S. Tucker - 20 Jan 2008 18:39 GMT
> -> There's something I find strange about Olber's paradox.
> -> Let me lay out a 3D XYZ cartesian grid, with arbitrary
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
>                                     dow

Thanks Dave, I need to review.
Regards
Ken
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.