Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsSpace ScienceAstronomyAmateur AstronomySpace FlightSpace StationShuttleSpace HistorySpace PolicySETI
SpaceKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Space Forum / Space Science / September 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Asteroid's Near-Miss May Be Home Run for Scientists (Asteroid 99942 Apophis)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
baalke@earthlink.net - 16 Aug 2005 18:02 GMT
http://www.umich.edu/news/?Releases/2005/Aug05/r081605c

Look out: Asteroid's near-miss may be home run for scientists
University of Michigan
August 16, 2005

ANN ARBOR, Mich. - A University of Michigan-led research team has
discovered that for the first time in history, scientists will be able
to observe how the Earth's gravity will disrupt a massive asteroid's
spin.

Scientists predict a near-miss when Asteroid 99942 Apophis passes Earth
in 2029. An asteroid flies this close to the planet only once every
1,300 years. The chance to study it will help scientists deal with the
object should it threaten collision with Earth.

Only about three Earth diameters will separate Apophis and Earth when
the 400-meter asteroid hurtles by Earth's gravity, which will twist the
object into a complex wobbling rotation. Such an occurrence has never
been witnessed but could yield important clues to the interior of the
sphere, according to a paper entitled, "Abrupt alteration of the spin
state of asteroid 99942 Apophis (2004 MN4) during its 2029 Earth
flyby,"
accepted for publication in the journal Icarus.

The team of scientists is led by U-M's Daniel Scheeres, associate
professor of aerospace engineering, and includes U-M's Peter
Washabaugh,
associate professor of aerospace engineering.

Apophis is one of more than 600 known potentially hazardous asteroids
and one of several that scientists hope to study more closely. In
Apophis' case, additional measurements are necessary because the 2029
flyby could be followed by frequent close approaches thereafter, or
even
a collision.

Scheeres said not only is it the closest asteroid flyby ever predicted
in advance, but it could provide a birds-eye view of the asteroid's
"belly."

"In some sense it's like a space science mission 'for free' in that
something scientifically interesting will happen, it will be observable
from Earth, and it can be predicted far in advance," Scheeres said.

If NASA places measuring equipment on the asteroid's surface,
scientists
could for the first time study an asteroid's interior, similar to how
geologists study earthquakes to gain understanding of the Earth's core,
Scheeres said. Because the torque caused by the Earth's gravitational
pull will cause surface and interior disruption to Apophis, scientists
have a unique opportunity to observe its otherwise inaccessible
mechanical properties, Scheeres said. Throwing the asteroid off balance
could also affect its orbit and how close it comes to Earth in future
years.

"Monitoring of this event telescopically and with devices placed on the
asteroid's surface could reveal the nature of its interior, and provide
us insight into how to deal with it should it ever threaten collision,"
Scheeres said.

The asteroid will be visible in the night sky of Europe, Africa and
Western Asia.

The asteroid was discovered late last year and initially scientists
gave
it a 1-in-300 chance of hitting the Earth on April 13, 2029. Subsequent
analysis of new and archived pre-discovery images showed that Apophis
won't collide with Earth that day, but that later in 2035, 2036, and
2037 there remains a 1-in-6,250 chance that the asteroid could hit
Earth, Scheeres said. Conversely, that's a 99.98 percent chance that
the
asteroid will miss Earth.

The asteroid is relatively small, about the length of three football
fields. If it hit it wouldn't create wide-scale damage to the Earth,
but
would cause major damage at the impact site, Scheeres said.

The team of scientists also includes Lance Benner and Steve Ostro of
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Alessandro Rossi of ISTI-CNR, Italy,
and Francesco Marzari of the University of Padova, Italy.

The University of Michigan College of Engineering is ranked among the
top engineering schools in the country. It boasts one of the largest
engineering research budgets of any public university, at $135 million
for 2004. Michigan Engineering has 11 departments and two NSF
Engineering Research Centers. Within those departments and centers,
there is a special emphasis on research in three emerging areas:
nanotechnology and integrated microsystems; cellular and molecular
biotechnology; and information technology. Michigan Engineering is
seeking to raise $110 million for capital building projects and program
support in these areas to further research discovery. Its goal is to
advance academic scholarship and market cutting edge research to
improve
public health and well being. For more information, see the Michigan
Engineering home page: http://www.engin.umich.edu .

Contact: Laura Bailey <baileylm@umich.edu>
Phone: (734) 647-7087 or (734) 647-1848
Jonathan Silverlight - 16 Aug 2005 19:29 GMT
>http://www.umich.edu/news/?Releases/2005/Aug05/r081605c
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>Scientists predict a near-miss when Asteroid 99942 Apophis passes Earth
>in 2029.

Was it named by a Stargate SG-1 fan? :-)
Signature

Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.

tholen@antispam.ham - 16 Aug 2005 22:02 GMT
> baalke@earthlink.net writes

>> Scientists predict a near-miss when Asteroid 99942 Apophis passes Earth
>> in 2029.

> Was it named by a Stargate SG-1 fan? :-)

It was named by members of the Spaceguard SG-1 team.
Jonathan Silverlight - 16 Aug 2005 22:50 GMT
>> baalke@earthlink.net writes
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>It was named by members of the Spaceguard SG-1 team.

Love it! But I think it's a terrible choice of name. The kooks are going
to have fun when they realise the Destroyer is coming. After all, they
will have forgotten that the world was supposed to end in 2012.
tholen@antispam.ham - 17 Aug 2005 12:42 GMT
>>> baalke@earthlink.net writes

>>>> Scientists predict a near-miss when Asteroid 99942 Apophis passes Earth
>>>> in 2029.

>>> Was it named by a Stargate SG-1 fan? :-)

>> It was named by members of the Spaceguard SG-1 team.

> Love it! But I think it's a terrible choice of name.

Why?  Apophis was the Egyptian god of evil and destruction.

> The kooks are going
> to have fun when they realise the Destroyer is coming.

They already had fun claiming that the Twelfth Planet was going to
cause a massive pole shift in 2003.  They already had fun with the
Face on Mars.  Following the tradition of naming Aten-type asteroids
after Egyptian gods isn't going to prevent anyone from having fun in
a similar way.

> After all, they
> will have forgotten that the world was supposed to end in 2012.

Or 2003 May.
Michael Baldwin Bruce - 18 Aug 2005 11:29 GMT
Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham whined:

> >>> baalke@earthlink.net writes
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Why?  Apophis was the Egyptian god of evil and destruction.

You've been watch too much Stargate, Dickless.

> > The kooks are going
> > to have fun when they realise the Destroyer is coming.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> after Egyptian gods isn't going to prevent anyone from having fun in
> a similar way.

What 12th planet, Dickless?

> > After all, they
> > will have forgotten that the world was supposed to end in 2012.
>
> Or 2003 May.

Non sequitur.
Jonathan Silverlight - 18 Aug 2005 19:00 GMT
>Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham whined:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>You've been watch too much Stargate, Dickless.

Do some more reading, stupid. I am well aware Apophis is the chief nasty
in Stargate - that's why I posted the comment - but he's also one of the
really nasty characters in the "real" ancient Egyptian pantheon.

>> > The kooks are going
>> > to have fun when they realise the Destroyer is coming.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>What 12th planet, Dickless?

The one kooks like Zechariah Sitchin write about. Note that no-one here
is taking this too seriously :-)

>> > After all, they
>> > will have forgotten that the world was supposed to end in 2012.
>>
>> Or 2003 May.

Or 1999. Hey, I'm dead. Twice. "You only live thrice"?

>Non sequitur.

So long, you offensive little troll.
Plonk.
How did comp.os.os2.advocacy get into the newsgroup list? Trimmed as off
topic :-)
tholen@antispam.ham - 18 Aug 2005 20:04 GMT
> Michael Baldwin Bruce writes

>>>>>> baalke@earthlink.net writes

>>>>>>> Scientists predict a near-miss when Asteroid 99942 Apophis passes Earth
>>>>>>> in 2029.

>>>>>> Was it named by a Stargate SG-1 fan? :-)

>>>>> It was named by members of the Spaceguard SG-1 team.

>>>> Love it! But I think it's a terrible choice of name.

>>> Why?  Apophis was the Egyptian god of evil and destruction.

>> You've been watch too much Stargate, Dickless.

> Do some more reading, stupid. I am well aware Apophis is the chief nasty
> in Stargate - that's why I posted the comment - but he's also one of the
> really nasty characters in the "real" ancient Egyptian pantheon.

Perhaps Michael Baldwin Bruce thinks that the entire Egyptian mythology
originated with the Stargate movie and subsequent television series.
Ignorance is bliss, as the saying goes.

>>>> The kooks are going
>>>> to have fun when they realise the Destroyer is coming.

>>> They already had fun claiming that the Twelfth Planet was going to
>>> cause a massive pole shift in 2003.  They already had fun with the
>>> Face on Mars.  Following the tradition of naming Aten-type asteroids
>>> after Egyptian gods isn't going to prevent anyone from having fun in
>>> a similar way.

>> What 12th planet, Dickless?

> The one kooks like Zechariah Sitchin write about. Note that no-one here
> is taking this too seriously :-)

Nancy Lieder did; even had her puppy put to sleep.  Though one could
argue that she's not "here" anymore.

>>>> After all, they
>>>> will have forgotten that the world was supposed to end in 2012.

>>> Or 2003 May.

> Or 1999. Hey, I'm dead. Twice. "You only live thrice"?

>> Non sequitur.

> So long, you offensive little troll.
> Plonk.
> How did comp.os.os2.advocacy get into the newsgroup list? Trimmed as off
> topic :-)

Michael Baldwin Bruce added it, along with two other newsgroups.  He
has no concept of what is on-topic.  He simply adds as many newsgroups
to the distribution as Google will allow.  He enjoys being a pest.
Michael Baldwin Bruce - 19 Aug 2005 12:21 GMT
Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham whined:

> > Michael Baldwin Bruce writes
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> originated with the Stargate movie and subsequent television series.
> Ignorance is bliss, as the saying goes.

On what basis do you make that claim, Dickless?
On what basis do you claim to speak for me, Dickless?

> >>>> The kooks are going
> >>>> to have fun when they realise the Destroyer is coming.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Nancy Lieder did; even had her puppy put to sleep.  Though one could
> argue that she's not "here" anymore.

More details about Nancy and Dickless here -

http://www.mindspring.com/~jeffpo/tholen1.htm

> >>>> After all, they
> >>>> will have forgotten that the world was supposed to end in 2012.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> has no concept of what is on-topic.  He simply adds as many newsgroups
> to the distribution as Google will allow.  He enjoys being a pest.

Non sequitur and rather ironic coming from a spamming pest like you,
Dickless.
Art Deco - 19 Aug 2005 15:35 GMT
>Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham whined:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
>> has no concept of what is on-topic.  He simply adds as many newsgroups
>> to the distribution as Google will allow.  He enjoys being a pest.

Pest alert!  Break out the RAID!

>Non sequitur and rather ironic coming from a spamming pest like you,
>Dickless.

Perhaps Classic Tholenator(tm) could start poasting lits of liars and
pests, and called such lits "refutation".

ne.weather added for the benefit of cousin St. Foamy the Retuftor.

Signature

Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler

"Don't be too envious. Yes, I have got it all. I am rich, I
have a good education, and I am rather good looking .. so
where does that leave you?
C."
 -- Charles D. "Chuckweasel" Bohne polishes his ego a bit

"That's what you expect from people who think that the
cyberworld isn't "RL"."
 -- Dr. David Tholen, Psychic Astrologer

"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."
 -- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004

Room 101 - 23 Aug 2005 23:16 GMT
Doesn't a "near-miss" mean it hit? It should be a "near-hit".
tholen@antispam.ham - 24 Aug 2005 00:32 GMT
> Doesn't a "near-miss" mean it hit?

Not necessarily; it could mean that it wasn't a far-miss.

> It should be a "near-hit".

Not necessarily; see above.
Michael Baldwin Bruce - 24 Aug 2005 02:15 GMT
Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham whined:

> > Doesn't a "near-miss" mean it hit?
>
> Not necessarily; it could mean that it wasn't a far-miss.

On what basis do you make that claim, Dickless?

> > It should be a "near-hit".
>
> Not necessarily; see above.

See below.
MIKE ROSS - 29 Sep 2005 16:41 GMT
"tholen@antispam.ham" bravely wrote to "All" (23 Aug 05  23:32:30)
--- on the heady topic of "Re: Asteroid's Near-Miss May Be Home Run for Scientists (Asteroid 99942"

th> From: tholen@antispam.ham
th> Xref: core-easynews sci.astro:444280 alt.sci.planetary:64654
th> rec.music.classical:502073 comp.os.os2.advocacy:448418
th> alt.usenet.kooks:1173450

th> Room 101 <notme@nowhere.net> writes:

> Doesn't a "near-miss" mean it hit?

th> Not necessarily; it could mean that it wasn't a far-miss.

> It should be a "near-hit".

th> Not necessarily; see above.

I would prefer to have it described as a "narrow escape" as the Brits
say it, than our "near miss" over here, which is simply rock stupid!

M*i*k*e

... Chicken Little only has to be right once.
Michael Baldwin Bruce - 19 Aug 2005 12:16 GMT
> >Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham whined:
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> in Stargate - that's why I posted the comment - but he's also one of the
> really nasty characters in the "real" ancient Egyptian pantheon.

Where do you think they swipped the characters from, twit?

> >> > The kooks are going
> >> > to have fun when they realise the Destroyer is coming.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> The one kooks like Zechariah Sitchin write about. Note that no-one here
> is taking this too seriously :-)

You seem to be.

> >> > After all, they
> >> > will have forgotten that the world was supposed to end in 2012.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> How did comp.os.os2.advocacy get into the newsgroup list? Trimmed as off
> topic :-)

You're one to talk.
Raving Loonie - 18 Aug 2005 13:35 GMT
> >> baalke@earthlink.net writes
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> to have fun when they realise the Destroyer is coming. After all, they
> will have forgotten that the world was supposed to end in 2012.

Here is more information

 http://impact.arc.nasa.gov/news_detail.cfm?ID=161

RL
Michael Baldwin Bruce - 17 Aug 2005 12:34 GMT
> > baalke@earthlink.net writes
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> It was named by members of the Spaceguard SG-1 team.

The fag division. Soap droppers section.
h.poropudas@luukku.com - 19 Aug 2005 10:08 GMT
(99942) Apophis asteroid
(= 2004 MN4)

Physical data:

Orbital Type: AT
Diameter: 430 - 970 m
H:  19.20
G:  0.15
Rotation Period:  30.5376 hr
Quality: 2!
Lightcurve Amplitude:  1.0 mag
Radar Observations: Y

Reference:
http://earn.dlr.de/nea/99942.htm

Orbital simulation figures available:

Reference:
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/db?name=99942

(99942) Apophis - impactor table

Object: 99942

    date        MJD      sigma sigimp   dist +/-   width    stretch
p_RE    exp. en.    PS

  YYYY/MM                               (RE)       (RE)      RE/sig
          MT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2036/04/13.371 64796.371  0.540 0.000    1.14 +/-    0.003  4.64E+03
2.71E-04  2.37E-01  -1.19

2042/04/13.724 66987.724  0.519 0.000    1.63 +/-    0.000  1.71E+06
6.51E-07  5.69E-04  -3.88

2044/04/13.296 67718.296  0.571 0.000    2.08 +/-    0.000  8.78E+05
4.20E-07  3.67E-04  -4.09

2068/04/12.632 76483.632  2.601 0.000    0.27 +/-    0.130  4.33E+05
1.34E-07  1.17E-04  -4.80

2072/10/15.333 78130.333 -0.680 0.000    0.50 +/-    0.000  8.40E+06
1.61E-07  1.41E-04  -4.75

Based on  952 optical observations (of which   5 are rejected as
outliers)
from 2004/03/15.108 to 2005/07/11.176, and also on six radar data
points
on 2005/01/27, 2005/01/29, 2005/01/31 and 2005/08/07.

NOTE: The Virtual Impactor in 2036/04/13.371 in the table above is
rated as Torino Scale 1.

Coordinates are given on the Target Plane
Unit is one Earth radius, but impact cross section
has radius between  2.15 and  2.16 Earth radii

(Remark: lines have been too long, this is why form of lines as above)

Reference:
http://newton.dm.unipi.it/cgi-bin/neodys/neoibo?objects:Apophis;risk

(99942) Apophis:

Reference:
http://newton.dm.unipi.it/cgi-bin/neodys/neoibo?objects:Apophis;main

(99942) Apophis - Proper elements and encounter condtions:

Reference:
http://newton.dm.unipi.it/cgi-bin/neodys/neoibo?objects:Apophis;properel;gif

(99942) Apophis - Stationary points:

Reference:
http://newton.dm.unipi.it/cgi-bin/neodys/neoibo?objects:Apophis;statpts;gif

Couple other references:

Figure about orbit deflection near Earth (13 April 2029):

http://star.arm.ac.uk/~dja/mn4.html

Watch movie about form of the object:

http://www.umich.edu/news/?Releases/2005/Aug05/r081605c

Please take a look references.

I think that this asteroid could be real danger to the Earth !!!

Hannu

> http://www.umich.edu/news/?Releases/2005/Aug05/r081605c
>
[quoted text clipped - 96 lines]
> Contact: Laura Bailey <baileylm@umich.edu>
> Phone: (734) 647-7087 or (734) 647-1848
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.